Advertisement

Studying Injustice in the Macro and Micro Spheres: Four Generations of Social Psychological Research

Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS, volume 11)

Abstract

Building from Deutsch’s intellectual contribution to social justice, this chapter situates examples of recent justice scholarship within classical and contemporary theory and research. It takes the genealogy of academic mentorship and research seriously and positions four generations of justice scholarship in relationship to one another: Kurt Lewin’s work on the psychology of groups and social norms; Morton Deutsch’s work on conflict and justice; Susan Opotow’s work on the scope of justice and moral exclusion; and Sara I. McClelland’s work on evaluations of satisfaction in intimate relationships. Over the course of this chapter, we use justice concepts as a way to discuss how individuals are influenced by history, status, and power when they evaluate experiences of injustice in the private sphere.

Keywords

Distributive justice Fairness Intimate Social psychology Research methods Inter-personal relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our two readers, Morton Deutsch and Michelle Fine, for their feedback on earlier drafts of this chapter. Their insights and wisdom enhanced our thinking immeasurably. Thanks also to Robert Jansen for his helpful comments.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1968). The person in psychology: Selected essays by Gordon W. Allport. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association (APA), Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2010). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf.
  3. Ash, M. G. (1992). Cultural contexts and scientific change in psychology: Kurt Lewin in Iowa. American Psychology, 47, 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four papers (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berscheid, E., & Peplau, L. A. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In H. H. Kelley et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 1–19). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Biernat, M., & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackman, J. (1989). Intimate violence: A study of injustice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byers, E. S., & Wang, A. (2004). Understanding sexuality in close relationships from the social exchange perspective. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, S. Sprecher, J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 203–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Cantril, H. (1965). The patterns of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crosby, F. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(3), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 2.Google Scholar
  16. DeLamater, J. (1991). Emotions and sexuality. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Deaux, K. (2006). To be an immigrant. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deutsch, M. (1973). Conflict resolution: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  23. Deutsch, M. (1990). Psychological roots of moral exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deutsch, M. (1992). Kurt Lewin: the tough minded and tender hearted scientist. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deutsch, M. (1999). A personal perspective on the development of social psychology in the 20th century. In A. Rodrigues and R. Levine (Eds.), Reflections on 100 years of experimental social psychology (pp. 1–34). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  26. Deutsch, M. (2006). A framework for thinking about oppression and its change. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deutsch, M., & Collins, M. E. (1951). Interracial housing: A psychological evaluation of a social experiment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  28. Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1965). Theories in social psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
  31. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.Google Scholar
  32. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2007). The politics of teen women’s sexuality: Public policy and the adolescent female body. Emory Law Journal, 56(4), 993–1038.Google Scholar
  33. Fine, M., Roberts, R., Torre, M., Bloom, J., Burns, A., Chajet, L., et al. (2004). Echoes of Brown: Youth documenting and performing the legacy of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2006). Intimate details: Participatory action research in prison. Action Research, 4, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., Hylton, D., et al. (2003). Participatory action research: Within and beyond bars. In P. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley, (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 173–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  37. Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2009). Internalized homophobia and relationship quality among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 97–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garland, D. (2005). Penal excess and surplus meaning: Public torture lynchings in twentieth-century America. Law & Society Review, 39(4), 793–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.). (1998). The handbook of social psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Hafer, C. L., & Olsen, J. M. (2003). An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 311–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hatfield, E., Rapson, R., & Aumer-Ryan, K. (2008). Social justice in love relationships: Recent developments. Social Justice Research, 21(4), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Cook, K. S. (2000). Distributive justice: Recent theoretical developments and applications. In J. Sanders & V. Lee Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 93–132). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  43. Herek, G. M. (2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: A social science perspective. American Psychologist, 61(6), 607–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herek, G. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 905–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Holland, J., Ramasanoglu, C., & Sharpe, S. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  46. Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kleiber, L. (n.d.). History of hairdressers: Physical culture & aesthetic norms in Nazi Germany. Retrieved May 18, 2011, from http://learning-from-history.de/International/content/8644/Physical%20Culture%20
  49. Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kressel, K., Lopez-Morillas, M., Weinglass, J., & Deutsch, M. (1979). Professional intervention in divorce: The views of Lawyers, Therapists, and Clergy. In G. Levinger & O. Moles (Eds.), Divorce and separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1992). Development of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction in long term relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1(3), 123–128.Google Scholar
  52. Lerner, M. J., & Mikula, G. (1994). Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  53. Lewin, K. (1933/1986). “Everything within me rebels”: A letter from Kurt Lewin to Wolfgang Köhler, 1933. Journal of Social Issues, 42(4), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewin, K. (1948). The background of conflict in marriage. In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (pp. 84–102). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  57. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Likert, R. (1947). Kurt Lewin: A pioneer in human relations research. Human Relations, 1(1), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McClelland, S. I. (2009). Intimate justice: Sexual satisfaction in young adults (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.Google Scholar
  62. McClelland, S. I. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McClelland, S. I. (in press). Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexuality Research and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  64. McClelland, S. I., & Fine, M. (2008a). Writing on cellophane: Studying teen women’s sexual desires; Inventing methodological release points. In K. Gallagher (Ed.), The Methodological dilemma: Critical and creative approaches to qualitative research (pp. 232–260). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. McClelland, S. I., & Fine, M. (2008b). Rescuing a theory of adolescent sexual excess: Young women and wanting. In A. Harris (Ed.), Next wave cultures: Feminism, subcultures, activism (pp. 83–102). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. McKinley, J. (2010, October 3). Suicides put light on pressures of gay teenagers. The New York Times, p. A9.Google Scholar
  67. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morawski, J. G. (2001). Gifts bestowed, gifts withheld: Assessing psychological theory with a Kochian attitude. American Psychologist, 56(5), 433–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moreland, R. L. (1996). Lewin’s legacy for small groups research. Systems Practice, 9, 7–26 (Special issue of the journal, edited by S. Wheelan, devoted to Kurt Lewin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Opotow, S. (1987). Limits of fairness: An experimental examination of antecedents of the scope of justice. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York, United States. Retrieved August 16, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses @ Columbia University (Publication No. AAT 8724072).Google Scholar
  72. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An overview. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Opotow, S. (1991). Adolescent peer conflicts: Implications for students and for schools. Education and Urban Society, 23, 416–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Opotow, S. (1993). Animals and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Opotow, S. (1995). Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 347–369). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  76. Opotow, S. (1997). What’s fair? Justice issues in the affirmative action debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(2), 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Opotow, S. (2001a). Social injustice. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 102–109). New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  78. Opotow, S. (2001b). Reconciliation in times of impunity: Challenges for social justice. Social Justice Research, 14(2), 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Opotow, S. (2003). The psychology of impunity and injustice: Implications for social reconciliation. In M. C. Bassiouni (Ed.), Post conflict justice (pp. 201–216). Ardsley, NY: Transnational Press.Google Scholar
  80. Opotow, S. (2005). Hate, conflict, and moral exclusion. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed). The psychology of hate (pp. 121–153). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Opotow, S. (2006). Aggression and violence. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 509–532). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  82. Opotow, S. (2008a). “Not so much as place to lay our head...”: Moral inclusion and exclusion in the American Civil War Reconstruction. Social Justice Research, 21(1), 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Opotow, S. (2008b). Conflict and justice after the American Civil War: Inclusion and exclusion in the Reconstruction and Jim Crow eras. In K. A. Hegtvedt & J. Clay-Warner (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Special issue on justice (Vol. 25, pp. 55–85). United Kingdom: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  84. Opotow, S. (2011). How this was possible: Interpreting the Holocaust. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 205–224.Google Scholar
  85. Opotow, S., & McClelland, S. I. (2007). The intensification of hating: A theory. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 68–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Orbuch, T. L., & Harvey, J. H. (1991). Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of sexuality in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 9–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  87. Ouellette, S. C., & Frost, D. (2006).  The possibilities of personality psychology and persons for the study of health.  In M. Vollrath (Ed.),  Handbook of personality and health (pp. 235–255).  New York:  Wiley.Google Scholar
  88. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Personality and social structure: Social psychological contributions. In R. Hogan & J. A. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 417–438). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  89. Pettigrew, T. F. (2006). The advantages of multilevel approaches. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 615–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Roe, M., Wessells, M., & McKay, S. (2006). Pioneers in peace psychology: Morton Deutsch. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12(4), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rubin, J. Z., & Levinger, G. (1995). Levels of analysis: In search of generalizable knowledge. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 13–38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  93. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ryff, C. D. (1987). The place of personality and social structure research in social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1192–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sarup, G. (1975). Levels of analysis in social psychology and related social sciences. Human Relations, 28, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2004). Sex. In R. M. Lerner, L. Steinberg, R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 189–231). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  97. Sen, A. (1995). Gender inequality and theories of justice. In M. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture, and development: A study of human capabilities (pp. 259–273). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and entitlement in marriage: Benefits and barriers. In M. J. Lerner, G. Mikula, M. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 229–258). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  99. Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  100. Steil, J. M. (2001). Family forms and member well-being: A research agenda for the decade of behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(4), 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  102. Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review 2000–2009. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology and Women’s Studies, Michigan Society of FellowsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center, City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations