Skip to main content

What Public Engagement in Archaeology Really Means

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Archaeology in Society

Abstract

This chapter explores what “public engagement” in archaeology really means, and whether or not all forms of “engagement” are always positive. Drawing from their professional experience, the authors consider aspects of archaeology that are particularly conducive to public involvement, as well as those that are not. The authors consider in particular situations they have encountered where their role as “professional” archaeologists have sometimes been at odds with public perceptions of archaeology and archaeologists. Flatman draws in particular from his experience of working in relation to UK’s “Portable Antiquities Scheme” where he regularly witnesses the problems of excessive interest in archaeology; Chidester and Gadsby from their experiences of developing “community” archaeology projects in USA, where they witness the opposite, a lack of sustained popular interest in archaeology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://www.helm.org.uk/server/show/nav.20434.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba105/spoilheap.shtml.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.boydell.co.uk/43834154.HTM.

  4. 4.

    See http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba106/feat1.shtml, http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba106/feat2.shtml and http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba106/letters.shtml.

  5. 5.

     Seehttp://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/notableCases/Opinions/07cv614-ReportAndRecommendation-Odyssey.pdf.

  6. 6.

    See http://www.finds.org.uk/.

  7. 7.

    See http://www.mcga.gov.uk/c4mca/mcga07-home/emergencyresponse/mcga-receiverofwreck.htm.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/5075.aspx/.

  9. 9.

    See http://www.cultureforall.info/front and http://www.communityarchives.org.uk/page_id__596_path__0p3p17p.aspx.

  10. 10.

    For an example of some of the numerous media reports on the find, see http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6847081.ece; the find’s official web site is http://www.staffordshirehoard.org.uk/.

  11. 11.

    See for example http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6259437/Archaeological-sites-face-ruin-from-treasure-hunting-nighthawkers.html,http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Staffordshire-Hoard-Terry-Herbert-Glad-To-Get-Rid-Of-Anglo-Saxon-Gold-Items/Article/200909415388702?lpos=UK_News_Article_Related_Content_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15388702_Staffordshire_Hoard%3A_Terry_Herbert_Glad_To_Get_Rid_Of_Anglo-Saxon_Gold_Items_,http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/25/alexander-chancellor-staffordshire-hoard  and  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/08/response-metal-detectorists.

  12. 12.

    See http://www.finds.org.uk/.

References

  • Adams, S. 2009 Largest Anglo-Saxon Hoard in History Discovered, The Daily Telegraph, 25th September 2009, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/6227061/Largest-Anglo-Saxon-hoard-in-history-discovered.html.

  • Benjamin, R. 2003 Black and Asian Representation in UK Archaeology, The Archaeologist 48 (Spring 2003): 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everill, P. 2009 The Invisible Diggers: A Study of British Commercial Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flatman, J. 2009 Guest Blogger on the Topic ‘Where there’s Muck there’s Brass’: Archaeology and the Real World?’, Museum of Underwater Archaeology (17th June 2009), http://muablog.wordpress.com/.

  • Chidester, R. C. and Gadsby, D. A. 2009 One Neighbourhood, Two Communities: The Public Archaeology of Class in a Gentrifying Urban Neighbourhood. International Labour and Working Class History 76: 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadsby, D. A. and Chidester, R. C. 2007a Hampden Community Archaeology Project, CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship 4(1): 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadsby, D. A. and Chidester, R. C. 2007b Heritage in Hampden: A Participatory Research Design for Public Archaeology in a Working-Class Neighbourhood in Baltimore, Maryland. In B. J. Little and P. A. Shackel (eds.) Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement. Walnut Creek: AltaMira. 223–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, M. 2009 Staffordshire Gold, British Archaeology 109 (November/December 2009): 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joe Flatman , Robert C. Chidester or David A. Gadsby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flatman, J., Chidester, R.C., Gadsby, D.A. (2011). What Public Engagement in Archaeology Really Means. In: Rockman, M., Flatman, J. (eds) Archaeology in Society. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9881-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics