• Petros Xanthopoulos
  • Panos M. Pardalos
  • Theodore B. Trafalis
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Optimization book series (BRIEFSOPTI)


Data mining (DM), conceptually, is a very general term that encapsulates a large number of methods, algorithms, and technologies. The common denominator among all these is their ability to extract useful patterns and associations from data usually stored in large databases. Thus DM techniques aim to provide knowledge and interesting interpretation of, usually, vast amounts of data. This task is crucial, especially today, mainly because of the emerging needs and capabilities that technological progress creates. In this monograph we investigate some of the most well-known data mining algorithms from an optimization perspective and we study the application of robust optimization (RO) in them. This combination is essential in order to address the unavoidable problem of data uncertainty that arises in almost all realistic problems that involve data analysis. In this chapter we provide some historical perspectives of data mining and its foundations and at the same time we “touch” the concepts of robust optimization and discuss its differences compared to stochastic programming.


  1. 1.
    Abello, J., Pardalos, P., Resende, M.: Handbook of massive data sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 5.
    Bayes, T.: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. R. Soc. Lond. Philos. Trans 53, 370–418 (1763)Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., Nemirovski, A.S.: Robust optimization. Princeton Univ Pr (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Mathematical Programming 88(3), 411–424 (2000)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 8.
    Bertsimas, D., Pachamanova, D., Sim, M.: Robust linear optimization under general norms. Operations Research Letters 32(6), 510–516 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 9.
    Bertsimas, D., Sim, M.: The price of robustness. Operations Research 52(1), 35–53 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 10.
    Birge, J., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer Verlag (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Bishop, C.: Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer New York (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Blondin, J., Saad, A.: Metaheuristic techniques for support vector machine model selection. In: Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS), 2010 10th International Conference on, pp. 197–200 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Bratko, I.: Prolog programming for artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Bryson, A., Ho, Y.: Applied optimal control: optimization, estimation, and control. Hemisphere Pub (1975)Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Fan, N., Pardalos, P.: Robust optimization of graph partitioning and critical node detection in analyzing networks. Combinatorial Optimization and Applications pp. 170–183 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    Fan, N., Zheng, Q., Pardalos, P.: Robust optimization of graph partitioning involving interval uncertainty. Theoretical Computer Science (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 27.
    Janak, S.L., Floudas, C.A.: Robust optimization: Mixed-integer linear programs. In: C.A. Floudas, P.M. Pardalos (eds.) Encyclopedia of Optimization, pp. 3331–3343. Springer US (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 28.
    Karmarkar, N.: A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 4(4), 373–395 (1984)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 35.
    Mangasarian, O., Street, W., Wolberg, W.: Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research 43(4), 570–577 (1995)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 36.
    McCarthy, J.: LISP 1.5 programmer’s manual. The MIT Press (1965)Google Scholar
  18. 37.
    McCarthy, J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., Shannon, C.: A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI MAGAZINE 27(4), 12 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 38.
    Minoux, M.: Robust linear programming with right-hand-side uncertainty, duality and applications. In: C.A. Floudas, P.M. Pardalos (eds.) Encyclopedia of Optimization, pp. 3317–3327. Springer US (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 39.
    Moore, G.: Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8), 114–117 (1965)Google Scholar
  21. 40.
    Nielsen, J.: Nielsens law of Internet bandwidth. Online at (1998)
  22. 41.
    Olafsson, S., Li, X., Wu, S.: Operations research and data mining. European Journal of Operational Research 187(3), 1429–1448 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 44.
    Rajaraman, A., Ullman, J.: Mining of massive datasets. Cambridge Univ Pr (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    Rosenblatt, F.: The Perceptron, a Perceiving and Recognizing Automaton Project Para. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory (1957)Google Scholar
  25. 52.
    Sim, M.: Approximations to robust conic optimization problems. In: C.A. Floudas, P.M. Pardalos (eds.) Encyclopedia of Optimization, pp. 90–96. Springer US (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 59.
    Tuy, H.: Robust global optimization. In: C.A. Floudas, P.M. Pardalos (eds.) Encyclopedia of Optimization, pp. 3314–3317. Springer US (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 60.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 61.
    Walter, C.: Kryder’s law. Scientific American 293(2), 32 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Petros Xanthopoulos,Panos M. Pardalos,Theodore B. Trafalis 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petros Xanthopoulos
    • 1
  • Panos M. Pardalos
    • 2
    • 3
  • Theodore B. Trafalis
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and Management SystemsUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Center for Applied Optimization Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Networks Analysis (LATNA)National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  4. 4.School of Industrial and Systems EngineeringThe University of OklahomaNormanUSA
  5. 5.School of MeteorologyThe University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations