Gestational Carrier

Chapter

Abstract

Gestational carrier is increasingly used as a treatment option for infertile women who do not have a uterus, who have a history of poor pregnancy outcomes, who are advised not to carry a pregnancy, or for same sex couples or for single men. Numerous medical, ethical, legal, and social issues are involved in gestational carrier cycles, particularly in instances when the commissioning couple and the carrier live in different countries and when use of donor gametes is also involved. Treatment involves appropriate counseling of all concerned parties regarding the entire process, including their rights, duties, and potential complications, thorough medical screening, signing of all consent forms, ensuring legal compliance, signing of detailed contracts between the parties, ovarian stimulation of the genetic mother, medical preparation of the carrier, ovulation induction, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer, care of the carrier during pregnancy and at delivery, and handing over the child after birth with genetic finger printing if desired.

Keywords

Hepatitis Estrogen Assure Expense Progesterone 

References

  1. 1.
    Old Testament, Book of Genesis 16:2, KJV.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Old Testament, Book of Genesis 30:3, KJV.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ber R. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. Ethical Issues in Gestational Surrogacy. Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21:153–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones HW, Cooke I, Kempers R, Brinsden P, Saunders D. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril. 2010;95:491–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1190–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shenfield G, Pennings G, Cohen J, Devroey P, de Wert G, Tarlatzis B. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2705–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Indian Council of Medical Research. National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision and Regulation of ART Clinics in India. Code of practice and ethical considerations and legal issues. New Delhi, India. National Academy of Medical Sciences (India). 2005, 68-69.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Indian Council of Medical Research. The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill. 2010;25–29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cotton K. Surrogacy should pay Br Med J. 2000;320:928–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tieu MM. Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers. J Med Ethics. 2009;35:171–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Boivin J, Appleton TC, Baetens P, Baron J, Bitzer J, Corrigan E, et al. Guidelines for counseling in infertility: outline version. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1301–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Den Ekker OB. Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:53–62.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health. Donor recruitment, assessment and screening; Surrogacy. Code of Practice for clinics licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 8th Edition. London 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jadva V, Murray C, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Golombok S. Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2196–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacCallum F, Lycett E, Murray C, Jadva V, Golombok S. Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1334–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schenker JG. Assisted reproduction practice in Europe: legal and ethical aspects. Hum Reprod. 1997;3:173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Utian WH, Sheean L, Goldfarb JM, Kiwi R. Successful pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Utian WH, Goldfarb JM, Kiwi R, et al. Preliminary experience with in vitro fertilization-surrogate gestational pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steptoe P. Surrogacy. Br Med J (Clin Res Edn). 1987;294:1688–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beski S, Gorgy A, Venkat G, et al. Gestational surrogacy: a feasible option for patients with Rokitansky syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corson SL, Kelly M, Braverman AM, English ME. Gestational carrier pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:670–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brinsden PR, Appleton TC, Murray E, et al. Treatment by in vitro fertilisation with surrogacy: experience of one British centre. BMJ. 2000;320:924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, et al. Eight years’ experience with an IVF surrogate gestational pregnancy programme. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meniru GI, Craft I. Assisted conception options for patients with good-prognosis cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;349:542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gibbons WE, Cedars M, Ness RB. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Writing Group. Toward understanding obstetrical outcome in advanced assisted reproduction: varying sperm, oocyte, and uterine source and diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parkinson J, Tran C, Tan T, Nelson J, Batzofin J, Serafini P. Perinatal outcome after in-vitro fertilization-surrogacy. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(3):671–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldfarb JM, Austin C, Peskin B, et al. Fifteen years experience with an in-vitro fertilization surrogate gestational pregnancy programme. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1075.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndoscopyNova IVI Fertility and Pulse Women’s HospitalAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations