Advertisement

A pedagogical image processing tool to understand structural dynamics

Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This paper presents a framework and one pedagogical application of motion tracking algorithms applied to structural dynamics. The aim of this work is to show the ability of high speed camera to study the dynamic characteristics of simple mechanical systems using a marker less and simultaneous Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) broadband analysis. KLT (Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi) trackers are used as virtual sensors on mechanical systems video. First we introduce the paradigm of virtual sensors in the field of modal analysis using video processing. Then we present a pedagogical example of flexible beam (Fishing rod) video. From KLT tracking we extracted displacements data (virtual sensors) which are then enhanced using filtering and smoothing and then we can identify natural frequency and damping ratio from classical modal analysis. The experimental results (mode shapes) are compared to an analytical flexible beam model showing high correlation but also showing the limitation of linear analysis. The main interest of this paper is that displacements are simply measured using only video at FPS (Frame Per Second) that respects the Nyquist frequency. There is no target needed on the structure only few critical pixels that are good features to track and which become virtual sensors.

Keywords

Mode Shape Optical Flow High Speed Camera Frequency Response Function Flexible Beam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. J. Ewins, Model Testing: Theory and Practice, Research Studies Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Olaszek, Investigation of the dynamic characteristic of bridge structures using a computer vision method. Measurement 25 (1999) 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Patsias and W.J. Staszewski, Damage detection using optical measurements and wavelets, Vol 1, Structural Health Monitoring, 1 (2002) 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.P. Poudel, G. Fu and J. Ye, Structural damage detection using digital video imaging technique and wavelet transformation, Journal of Sound and Vibration 286 (2005) 869–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.J. Lee, M. Shinozuka, A vision-based system for remote sensing of bridge displacement, NDT and E International 39 (5) (2006) 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.J. Lee, M. Shinozuka, Real-time displacement measurement of a flexible bridge using digital image processing techniques, Experimental Mechanics 46 (1) (2006) 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.M. Wahbeh, J.P. Caffrey, S.F. Masri, A vision-based approach for the direct measurement of displacements in vibrating systems, Smart Materials and Structures, Vol; 12 (5) (2003) 785–794.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Morlier, P. Salom, F. Bos, New image processing tools for structural dynamic monitoring, Key Engineering Materials Vol. 347 (2007) 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Morlier, G. Michon, Virtual vibration measurement using KLT motion tracking algorithm, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control (In Press 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.K. Aggarwal, and N. Nandhakumar, On the computation of motion from sequences of images - A review, in: Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 76(8), 1988 , pp. 917–935.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.D. Lucas and T. Kanade, 1981, An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision, in: Proceedings of Imaging understanding workshop, pp 121–130.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.L. Barron, D.J. Fleet, and S.S. Beauchemin, Performance of Optical Flow Techniques, International Journal of Computer Vision, 12 (1994) 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Lim, J.G. Apostolopoulos, A.E. Gamal, Optical flow estimation using temporally oversampled video, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing14 (2005) 1074–1087.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.Y. Bouguet, Pyramidal Implementation of the Lucas Kanade Feature Tracker, openCV documentation.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Shi and C. Tomasi. Good features to track, In: Proceedings IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1994, pp. 593–600.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    C.C. Chang, Y.F. Ji, Flexible videogrammetric technique for three-dimensional structural vibration measurement, 2007 Journal of Engineering Mechanics 133 (6), pp. 656–664.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. H. Richardson and D. L. Formenti, Parameter Estimation from Frequency Response Measurements using Rational Fraction Polynomials, in: Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference,1982, pp.167-181.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Wang and W.J. Worley, Tables of natural frequencies and nodes for transverse vibration of tapered beams, NASA CR 443, 1966.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.S. Rao, Mechanical vibrations, Prentice hall, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Timoshenko, Vibration Problems in Engineering, Constable & Company, London, 1928.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Businees Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISAE DMSMUniversité de ToulouseToulouse Cedex 4France

Personalised recommendations