Gear with Asymmetric Teeth for use in Wind Turbines

  • S. Ekwaro-Osire
  • T.-H Jang
  • A. Stroud
  • I. Durukan
  • F. M. Alemayehu
  • A. Swift
  • J. Chapman
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

In the US, wind energy is one of the electrical energy sources that are growing fastest. The growth has been linear at a rate of about 20% to 30% per year over the last decade. For the next two decades, the wind industry has set its goal to more than 20%. However, there still remains concern on the reliability of wind turbines. This concern is often directed to the fact that gearbox failure has been a major problem in the wind industry. Compared to the other wind turbine components, gearbox failures result in the second highest down time per failure. Currently, there are several initiatives underway to improve gearbox reliability in wind turbines. Additionally, due to the increasing performance requirements, there has also been need of new gear designs. Recently, theoretical analyses have shown that asymmetric gears may offer a potential to reduce the costs associated with the gear failures, while at the same time maintaining the fatigue life. Also, for wind turbine gearboxes, the gears experience only uni-directional loading. In these instances, the geometry of the drive side does not have to be symmetric to the coast side. This allows for the designing of gears with asymmetric teeth. The objective of this research was to design and construct a testbed for testing the performance of asymmetric gears. The tests to be performed on the testbed include gear dynamics, tip relief modification, high-contact-ratio, and wear.

Keywords

Fatigue Europe Torque Assure Beach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thresher R, Robinson M, Veers P, "Wind energy technology: Current status and r&d future," in Physics of Sustainable Energy, Berkeley, California, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thresher R, Robinson M, Veers P, "The future of wind energy technology in the united states," in World Renewable Energy Congress, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. Department of Energy, "20% wind energy by 2030 -- increasing wind energy’s contribution to u.S. Electricity supply," DOE/GO-102008-2567, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Veldkamp D, "A probabilistic approach to wind turbine fatigue design," in European Wind Energy, Milan, Italy, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Musial W, Butterfield S, McNiff B, "Improving wind turbine gearbox reliability," in European Wind Energy, Milan, Italy, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Röthlingshöfer T, Brecher C, Schröder T, Defourny M, Granville D, Hemmelmann J, Pape M, Quell A, Paulsen US, "Investigation of the dynamic behaviour of a wind turbine drive train for the use in a design platform," in European Wind Energy, Milan, Italy, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, "Wear of involute spur gears with asymmetric teeth under dynamic loading," in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, "Influence of tip relief modification on the wear of spur gears with asymmetric teeth," in STLE Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S (2008) Influence of tip relief modification on the wear of spur gears with asymmetric teeth. Tribology Transactions, 51:581–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, "Dynamic analysis of high-contact-ratio spur gears with asymmetric teeth," in 2008 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Boston, Massachusetts, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, Cárdenas-García JF, "Photoelastic analysis of an asymmetric gear tooth," in SEM Annual Conference & Exposition, Springfield, Massachusetts, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, Cavdar K, Babalik FC (2008) Dynamic analysis of involute spur gears with asymmetric teeth. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 50:1598–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, Chapman J, Swift A, "Wind power test bed," in WindPower 2007, Los Angeles, California, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, Khandaker MPH, "Probabilistic analysis of mems asymmetric gear tooth," in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karpat F, Ekwaro-Osire S, Khandaker MPH (2008) Probabilistic analysis of mems asymmetric gear tooth. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130:042306-1–042306-6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Litvin FL, Lian Q, Kapelevich AL (2000) Asymmetric modified spur gear drives: Reduction of noise, localization of contact, simulation of meshing and stress analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 188:363–390.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kapelevich AL, Shekhtman YV (2003) Direct gear design: Bending stress minimization. Gear Technology:44–49.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kapelevich A (2000) Geometry and design of involute spur gears with asymmetric teeth. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 35:117–130.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Di Francesco G, Marini S (2005) Asymmetrical gear wheels: Automatized procedure for the design. VDI Berichte, 1904 II:1735–1742.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brecher C, Schafer J (2005) Potentials of asymmetric tooth geometries for the optimisation of involute cylindrical gears. VDI Berichte, 1904 I:705–720.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karpat F, Cavdar K, Babalik FC, "An investigation on dynamic analysis of involute spur gears with asymmetric teeth: Dynamic load and transmission errors," in Power Transmissions 2006, Novi Sad, 2006, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blankenship GW, Kahraman A (1995) Steady state forced response of a mechanical oscillator with combined parametric excitation and clearance type non-linearity Journal of Sound and Vibration, 185:743–765MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petry-Johnson TT, Kahraman A, Anderson NE, Chase DR (2008) An experimental investigation of spur gear efficiency. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130:062601–062610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu H, Kahraman A, Anderson NE, Maddock DG (2007) Prediction of mechanical efficiency of parallel-axis gear pairs. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129:58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seetharaman S, Kahraman A (2009) Load-independent spin power looses of a spur gear pair: Model formulation. Journal of Tribology, 131.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kahraman A, Blankenship GW (1999) Effect of involute contact ratio on spur gear dynamics. Journal of Mechanical Design, 121:112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahraman A, Blankenship GW (1999) Effect of involute tip relief on dynamic response of spur gear pairs. Journal of mechanical design, 121:313–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Begg CD, Byington CS, Maynard KP, "Dynamics modeling for mechanical fault transition," in 54th Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology, Virginia Beach, VA, 2000, pp. 203–212.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Begg CD, Merdes T, Byington C, Maynard K, "Dynamics modeling for mechanical fault diagnostics and prognostics," in Maintenance and Reliability Conference (MARCON 99), Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Merdes TA, Lang DC, Kozlowski JD, Meister K, "Wear particle analysis results for variably loaded single reduction helical gearboxes," Pennsylvania State University 1998.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lin D, Wiseman M, Banjevic D, Jardine AKS (2004) An approach to signal processing and condition-based maintenance for gearboxes subject to tooth failure. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18:993–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Musial W, McNiff B, "Wind turbine testing in the nrel dynamometer test bed," in WindPower 2000, Palm Springs, California, 2000.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Green J, "225-kw dynamometer for testing small wind turbine components," in WindPower 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Businees Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Ekwaro-Osire
    • 1
  • T.-H Jang
    • 1
  • A. Stroud
    • 1
  • I. Durukan
    • 1
  • F. M. Alemayehu
    • 1
  • A. Swift
    • 2
  • J. Chapman
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Wind Science and Engineering Research CenterTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations