Investigation of the Coating Parameters for the Luminescent Photoelastic Coating Technique
The luminescent photoelastic coating (LPC) technique is an optical method to measure the full-field strain on 2D and 3D structural components. The maximum shear strain–or separated principal strain when oblique incidence is performed–and its corresponding principal strain direction are related to the relative changes in emission magnitude with respect to analyzer position. The amplitude of the emission change is termed optical strain response, OSR, and is a function of maximum shear strain, in the plane perpendicular to light propagation and two coating calibration parameters: the polarization efficiency, , and the coating characteristic, . Determining the coating parameters plays an important role since they affect the accuracy of the measurement. Generally, the coating parameters are calibrated in-situ with strain gage measurements and assumed independent of surface inclination. A better theoretical understanding of the two calibration coefficients, specifically the polarization efficiency, dependence on oblique excitation or emission inclination is necessary to improve full-field, strain-separation accuracy of the measurement. This study investigates and reports the effects of the coating parameters on OSR, and the current methods to determine the coating parameters.
Key Wordsluminescence photoelastic coating polarization efficiency strain measurement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hubner, JP, PG Ifju, KS Schanze, Y.Liu, L Chen, and W El-Ratal, “Luminescent Photoelastic Coatings,” Experimental Mechanics, 44(4), 416-424 (2004).Google Scholar
- 3.Hubner, JP, and L. Chen, “Coupled Strain and Fresnel Response of Photoelastic Coatings at Oblique Incidence,” Experimental Mechanics, 47(4), 549-560 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Esirgemez, E, and Hubner, JP, “Luminescent Photoelastic Coating Image Analysis and Strain Separation on a Three-dimensional Grid,” Proceedings of SPIE Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2010, ed. Ronald G. Driggers, Paper: 100005 (2010).Google Scholar
- 5.Zandman, F, S Redner and JW Dally, Photoelastic Coatings, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 31-35 (1977).Google Scholar
- 6.Lakowicz, JR, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed, Springer, 353-366 (2006).Google Scholar
- 7.Abdel-Aziz, YI, and HM Karara, “Direct Linear Transformation form Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates,” ASP Symposium on Close Range Photogrammetry, 1-18 (1971).Google Scholar
- 8.Dally, JW, and WF Riley, Experimental Stress Analysis, 4th ed., College House Enterprises, Tennessee, 9-11 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Chapra, SC, and RP Canale, Numerical Methods for Engineers with Software and Programming Applications, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 601-604 (2002).Google Scholar
- 10.Gerber, DR, and JP Hubner “Factorial Design Experiment to Analyze the Response of a Luminescent Photoelastic Coating” 48th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2010-0188, January (2010).Google Scholar