Advertisement

In-Flight Wing-Membrane Strain Measurements on Bats

  • Roberto Albertani
  • Tatjana Hubel
  • Sharon M. Swartz
  • Kenneth S. Breuer
  • Johnny Evers
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

An efficient system for high-resolution measurements of a bat wing’s membrane during flight is presented, proving the feasibility of dynamic strain measurements on bats wing membranes during flapping. Data were collected from wind tunnel wind-off flights of a Jamaican fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis, a nocturnal and frugivorous specie trained by Brown University team to fly back and forth in the test section. Visual image correlation was used for image post-processing providing spatial highresolution three-dimensional displacements and strains on the bat’s wing.

Temporal membrane surface-averaged strain analysis showed a level of strain in the X direction (spanwise) approximately three times larger then the Y direction (chordwise) with values around 10% and 3%, respectively. Strains are estimated from an unknown reference state at the beginning of each recorded sequence. Full surface membrane strain distribution shows a consistent strain-relief effect around the ring finger during downstroke in the X direction (spanwise). Temporal wing section shape analysis during a down stroke revealed a higher camber and a significant pitch-up twist of the ring finger respect to the free membrane between the little and ring finger.

Keywords

Wind Tunnel Test Section Ring Finger Wing Membrane Frugivorous Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Raney, D., L., Waszak, M., R., “Biologically Inspired Micro-Flight Research,” SAE 2003-01-3042, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albertani, R., Stanford, B., Hubner, J. P., and Ifju, P., “Aerodynamic Characterization and Deformation Measurements of a Flexible Wing Micro Air Vehicle,” SEM Journal, DOI: 10.1007/ s11340-006-9025-5, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sane, S. P., “The aerodynamics of insect flight,” J. Exp. Biol. 206, 4191–4208, 2003..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muijres, F. T., Johansson, L. C., Barfield, R., Wolf, M., Spedding, G. R. and Hedenström, A., “Leading-Edge Vortex Improves Lift in Slow-Flying Bats,” Science 319, 1250–1253, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warrick, D. R., Tobalske, B. W. and Powers, D. R., “Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 3747–3752, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norberg, U. M., “Aerodynamics, kinematics, and energetics of horizontal flapping flight in the long-eared bat Plecotus auritus,” J. Exp. Biol., 65, 179–212, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aldridge, H. D., “Kinematics and aerodynamics of the greater horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, in horizontal flight at various flight speeds,” J. Exp. Biol., 126, 479–497, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riskin, D. K., Bahlman, J. W., Hubel, T. Y., Ratcliffe, J. M., Kunz, T. H. and Swartz, S. M., “Bats go head-under-heels: the biomechanics of landing on a ceiling,” J. Exp. Biol., 212, 945–953, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riskin, D. K., Willis, D. J., Iriarte-Díaz, J., Hedrick, T. L., Kostandov, M., Chen, J., Laidlaw, D. H., Breuer, K. S. and Swartz, S. M., “Quantifying the complexity of bat wing kinematics,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 254, 604–615, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hubel, T., Hristov, N., Swartz, S. M. and Breuer, K. S., “Time-resolved wake structure and kinematics of bat flight,” Exp. Fluids 46, 933–943, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hubel, T. Y., Riskin, D. K., Swartz, S. M. and Breuer, K. (in review), “Wake structure and wing kinematics: the flight of the lesser short-nosed fruit bat, Cynopterus brachyotis”.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swartz, S., Bennett, M., Carrier, D. R., “Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight,” Nature, Vol. 359, 726–729, Nature Publishing Group, October 22, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swartz, S. M., Groves, M. S., Kim, H. D. and Walsh, W. R., “Mechanical properties of bat wing membrane skin,” J. Zool., 239, 357–378, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutton, M. A., Cheng, M., Peters, W. H., Chao, Y. J. and McNeill, S. R., “Application of an optimized digital correlation method to planar deformation analysis,” Image and Vision Computing, 4(3), pp. 143–151, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutton, M. A., Turner, J. L., Bruck, H. A., Chae, T. A., “Full field representation of the discretely sampled surface deformations for displacement and strain analysis,“ Experimental Mechanics, 1991:31(2): 168–77, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Babcock, J., Scheffer, R., Albertani, R., “Experimental Data for Micro Air Vehicles with Pliant Wings in Unsteady Conditions,” 27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamic and Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Chicago, IL, August, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Albertani
    • 1
  • Tatjana Hubel
    • 2
  • Sharon M. Swartz
    • 3
  • Kenneth S. Breuer
    • 2
  • Johnny Evers
    • 4
  1. 1.Research & Engineering Education Facility (REEF), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of FloridaShalimarUSA
  2. 2.Division of EngineeringBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  4. 4.Air Force Research Laboratory, RWGNEglin AFBUSA

Personalised recommendations