Advertisement

Using Antenarrative Approaches to Investigate the Perceptions of Information Systems’ Actors Regarding Failure and Success

  • Lynette Drevin
  • Darren Dalcher
Conference paper

Abstract

Many Information Systems are viewed as underperforming by failing to meet expectations or deliver value to customers. In order to try and understand why these problems occur we apply narrative methods in the IS domain, taking into account the stories that different groups of actors tell regarding their experiences of the development and use of new information systems. This paper presents the perspectives of multiple actors regarding success/failure and problems encountered in developing and using information systems from their experiences. Qualitative approaches are followed to gather, analyze and interpret the rich, multi-voiced and incoherent generated stories of stakeholders involved in software systems. It is shown that the antenarrative approach that is employed in this study can produce deeper insights into the experience world of involved actors.

Keywords

Information System Narrative Analysis Change Request Narrative Inquiry Super User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon work that was financially supported by the NRF. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors.

References

  1. Anon (2007) What determines a project success or failure?  www.lessons-from-history.com. Accessed 31 Oct 2007
  2. Boje DM (2001) Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Clandinin D, Connelly F (2000) Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortazzi M (1993) Narrative analysis. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Czarniawska B (1998) A narrative approach to organization studies. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalcher D (2004) Stories and histories: case study research (and beyond) in information systems failures. In: Whitman ME (ed) The handbook of information system research. Idea Group Inc. (IGI), London, pp 305–322Google Scholar
  7. Dalcher D (2009) Software project success: moving beyond failure. UPGRADE 10(5):42–50 (Oct 2009)Google Scholar
  8. Drevin L, Dalcher D (2011) Antenarrative and narrative: the experiences of actors involved in the development and use of information systems. In: Boje D (ed) Storytelling and the future of organizations: an antenarrative handbook. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Egorova E, Torchiano M, Morisio M, Wohlin C, Aurum A, Svensson RB (2009) Stakeholders’ perception of success: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of 35th EuroMicro conference on software engineering and advanced applications. Patras, Greece, pp 210–216Google Scholar
  10. Fortune J, Peters G (2005) Information systems: achieving success by avoiding failure. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  11. Harmer B, Pauleen D (2007) The work anytime anywhere mobility blues. In: 4th QAULIT conference. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang JJ, Klein G, Discenza R (2002) Perception differences of software success: provider and user views of system metrics. J Syst Softw 63(1):17–27 (July 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. KPMG (2005) Global IT project management survey. http://www.pmichapters-australia.org.au/canberra/documents/irmprm-global-it-pm-survey2005.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2007
  14. Lieblich A, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T (1998) Narrative research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyhne L (2007) eNatis crash may be due to missing safety net. Sunday Times. http://dariel.co.za/news6.html. Accessed 19 Oct 2007Google Scholar
  16. Mishler EG (1995) Models of narrative analysis: a typology. J Narrat Life Hist 5(2):87–123Google Scholar
  17. Riessman CK (1993) Narrative analysis. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  18. Standish (1999) A recipe for success. http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/chaos1999.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar 2004
  19. Standish (2001) Extreme chaos. http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/extreme_chaos.pdf. Accessed 8 Mar 2004
  20. Standish (2003) Latest Standish Group Chaos report shows project success rates have improved by 50%. http://www.standishgroup.com/pres/article.php?id=2. Accessed 23 Feb 2004
  21. Standish (2004) 2004 third quarter research report. http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/PDFpages/q3-spotlight.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2006
  22. Telegraph (2007) £20bn NHS computer system doomed to fail. http://www.telegraph.co.uk dated 13-2-2007. Accessed 19 Sept 2007

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa
  2. 2.National Center for Project ManagementMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations