Sparse Sampling in MRI

Chapter

Abstract

The significant time necessary to record each resonance echo from the volume being imaged in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has led to much effort to develop methods which take fewer measurements. Faster methods mean less time for the patient in the scanner, increased efficiency in the use of expensive scanning facilities, improved temporal resolution in studies involving moving organs or flows, and they lessen the probability that patient motion adversely affects the quality of the images. Images like those of the human body possess the property of sparsity, that is the property that in some transform space they can be represented much more compactly than in image space. The technique of compressed sensing, which aims to exploit sparsity, has therefore been adapted for use in MRI. This, coupled with the use of multiple receiving coils (parallel MRI) and the use of various forms of prior knowledge (e.g., support constraints in space and time), has resulted in significantly faster image acquisitions with only a modest penalty in the computational effort required for reconstruction. We describe the background motivation for adopting sparse sampling and show evidence of the sparse nature of biological image data sets. We briefly present the theory behind parallel MRI reconstruction, compressed sensing and the application of various forms of prior knowledge to image reconstruction. We summarize the work of other groups in applying these concepts to MRI and our own contributions. We finish with a brief conjecture on the possibilities for future development in the area.

References

  1. 1.
    McRobbie, D.W., Moore, E.A., Graves, M.J: MRI from Picture to Proton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, M.A., King, K.F., Zhou, X.J.: Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Candes, E., Romberg, J., Tao, T.: Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 489–509 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baraniuk, B.: Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24, 118–121 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geman, S., Geman, D.: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Intel. 6, 721–741 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu, X., Johnson, V., Wong, W.H., Chen, C-T.: Bayesian image processing in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Res. Imaging 9, 611–620 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strang, G.: The discrete cosine transform. SIAM Rev. 41, 135–147 (1999)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Velho, L., Frery, A., Gomes, J.: Image Processing for Computer Graphics and Vision, Ch. 9: Multiscale Analysis and Wavelets. Springer, London (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adluru, G., DiBella, E.V.R.: Reordering for improved constrained reconstruction from undersampled k-space data. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2008, 341684 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, B., Millane, R.P., Watts, R., Bones P.J.: Applying compressed sensing in parallel MRI. In: Proc. 16th Ann. Meet. ISMRM, Toronto, p. 1480 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pruessmann, K.P., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M.B., Boesiger, P.: SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donoho, D.L.: Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lustig, M., Donoho, D., Pauly, J.M.: Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 1182–1195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jain, A.K.: Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Candes, E., Romberg, J.: Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling. Inverse Probl. 23, 969–985 (2007)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Candes, E., Wakin, M.B.: An introduction to comprehensive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25, 21–30 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Santosa, F., Symes, W.W., Raggio, G.: Inversion of band-limited reflection seismograms using stacking velocities as constraints. Inverse Probl. 3, 477–499 (1987)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donoho, D.L.: De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41, 614–627 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D 60, 259–268 (1992)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Block, K.T., Uecker, M., Frahm, J.: Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn. Reson. Med. 57, 1086–1098 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sidky, E.Y., Pan, X.: Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 47–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seeger, M., Nickisch, H., Pohmann, R., Schölkopf, B.: Optimization of k-space trajectories for compressed sensing by Bayesian experimental design. Magn. Reson. Med. 63, 116–126 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Madore, B., Glover, G.H., Pelc, N.J.: Unaliasing by fourier-encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 813–828 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taso, J., Boesiger, P., Pruessmann, K.P.: k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations. Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 1031–1042 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jung, H., Sung, K., Nayak, K.S., Kim, E.Y., Ye, J.C.: k-t FOCUSS: a general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 103–116 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gamper, U., Boesiger, P., Kozerke, S.: Compressed sensing in dynamic MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 1031–1042 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu, B., Millane, R.P., Watts, R., Bones, P.J.: Prior estimate-based compressed sensing in parallel MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 65, 83–95 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu, B., Bones, P.J., Millane, R.P., Watts, R.: Prior estimated based compressed sensing in contrast enhanced MRA. In: Proc. 18th Ann. Meet., ISMRM, Stockholm (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu, B.: Exploiting Data Sparsity in Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations