Skip to main content

Rational Emotions: Animal Rights Theory, Feminist Critiques and Activist Insight

  • 4542 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I briefly present the foundational arguments for granting animals moral consideration, as developed by Tom Regan and Peter Singer. I also address the main feminist critiques to these arguments, which are rooted in the feminist care tradition and vegetarian ecofeminism. To evaluate these divergent philosophies of animal rights, I use studies that demographically and psychologically examine animal rights activists, vegans, and vegetarians (veg’ns) in order to contextualize and illuminate animal rights theory. This allows for an understanding of theory as a dialectical system of praxis, whereby theory and practice inform each other.

Keywords

  • Feminist Theory
  • Nonhuman Animal
  • Moral Consideration
  • Feminist Critique
  • Emotional Connection

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C. J. (1994). Bringing peace home: A feminist philosophical perspective on the abuse of women, children, and pet animals. Hypatia, 9, 63–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. J. (2007 [2006]). The war on compassion. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 21–36). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. (2007 [2005]). On the backs of animals: The valorization of reason in contemporary animal ethics. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 344–359). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botes, A. (2000). A comparison between the ethics of justice and the ethics of care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1071–1075.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Compa, L., & Fellner, J. (2005). Meat packing’s human toll. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2005/08/02/meatpackings-human-toll

  • Donovan, J. (1990). Animal rights and feminist theory. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15, 350–375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eisnitz, G. A. (1997). Slaughterhouse. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisnitz, G. A. (2003). Slaughterhouse. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the mind: Rationality and the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (2000). Asian American women and men: Labor, laws and love. New York: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t sleep around like white girls do”: Family, culture, and gender in Filipina American lives. Signs, 26, 415–440.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaard, G. C. (1993). Living interconnections with animals and nature. In G. C. Gaard (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, J. M. (2001). Animal rights and the politics of emotion: Folk constructs of emotions in the animal rights movement. In J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 212–229). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. (2005). Civil rights groups to PETA: ‘You have used us enough’, in Dissidentvoice on http://www.dissidentvoice.org. Retrieved on 1/15/08.

  • Herzog, H. A. (1993). “The movement is my life”: The psychology of animal rights activism. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 103–119.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. A. (2007). Gender differences in human–animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoos, 20, 7–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. A., & Golden, L. L. (2009). Moral emotions and social activism: The case of animal rights. New Perspectives on Human–Animal Interactions, 65, 485–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (2007). ‘I’m here but I’m there:’ The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. In D. A. Segura & E. P. Zavella (Eds.), Migration in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands: A reader. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2004). Blood, sweat and fear: Workers’ rights in U.S. meat and poultry plants. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, W. V., & Lunch, W. M. (1992). Rights of animals, perceptions of science, and political activism: Profile of American animal rights activists. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17, 438–458.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerolmack, C. (2003). Tracing the profile of animal rights supporters: A preliminary investigation. Society and Animals, 11, 245–263.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kelch, T. G. (2007 [1999]). The role of the emotional and the emotive in a theory of animal rights. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 259–300). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B. M., & Ginsberg., C. F. (2002). Animal rights as a post-citizenship movement. Society & Animals, 10, 203–215.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, B. (2007 [1992]). Justice, caring, and animal liberation. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 125–152). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, E. (2005). Meat market. Boston, MA: Brio Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nibert, D. (2002). Animal rights/human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plous, S. (1991). An attitude survey of animal rights activists. Psychological Science, 2, 194–196.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1991). Nature, self, and gender: Feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism. Hypatia, 6, 3–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prokhovnik, R. (2002). Rational woman: A feminist critique of dichotomy. New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2004 [1983]). The case for animal rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, E. (2001). Fast food nation: The dark side of the all-American meal. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrato, C. (2010). Race, class and veganism: A panel discussion. Long Beach, CA: Animal Liberation Forum, 4/15–4/18/2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, K. (2007 [1994]). The Caring Sleuth. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 153–173). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2009 [1975]). Animal liberation. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R., & Williams, N. (2009). Feminist ethics. In E. Zalata (Ed.) The stanford encyclopedia of ethics. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/feminism-ethics.

  • Torres, B. (2007). Making a killing: The political economy of animal rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol L. Glasser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glasser, C.L. (2011). Rational Emotions: Animal Rights Theory, Feminist Critiques and Activist Insight. In: Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., Shen-Miller, D. (eds) The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_18

Download citation