Vibro-Impact Dynamics of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvester

  • K. H. Mak
  • S. McWilliam
  • A. A. Popov
  • C. H. J. Fox
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

A common design of piezoelectric energy harvester consists of a piezoelectric monomorph cantilever which converts the ambient vibration into electrical energy. However, if the level of the ambient vibration is high, large bending stresses will develop in the monomorph, which can cause fatigue and mechanical failure. A stop is introduced into the harvester to reduce the bending stress by limiting the maximum amplitude of oscillation of the cantilever. The dynamics of such a system is complex and involves considerations of vibro-impact mechanics as well as electromechanical interactions. A theoretical model of a piezoelectric-vibro-impact system is demonstrated in this study. The theoretical model is able to predict the dynamical and electrical responses of an energy harvester. It also estimates the contact force between the cantilever and a stop. Typical simulation results are presented and the physical meaning of the results is explained. The simulation results also show that moving the position of a stop can significantly affect the electrical output from the monomorph.

Keywords

Energy harvesting Vibration Piezoelectricity Impact dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Babitsky V.I., Theory of Vibro-Impact Systems and Applications, 1998, Springer, Pages 245–255, 22 March 1980Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lo C.C., A cantilever beam chattering against a stop, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 245–255, 22 March 1980Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fathi A., Popplewell N., Improved Approximations for a Beam Impacting a Stop, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 170, Issue 3, Pages 365–375, 24 February 1994Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsai H. C., Wu M.K., Methods to compute dynamic response of a cantilever with a stop to limit motion, Computers & Structures, Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 859–867, 3 March 1996Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang C., Kim J., New Analysis Method for a Thin Beam Impacting Against a Stop based on the Full Continuous Model, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 191, Issue 5, Pages 809–823, 18 April 1996Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagg D.J., Bishop S. R., Application of Non-Smooth Modelling Techniques to the Dynamics of a Flexible Impacting Beam, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 256, Issue 5, Pages 803–820, 3 October 2002Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yin X.C., Qin Y., Zou H., Transient responses of repeated impact of a beam against a stop, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Volume 44, Issues 22–23, Pages 7323–7339, November 2007Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sodano H.A., Park G. and Inman D.J., Estimation of Electric Charge Output for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting, Strain (40), Pages 49–58, 2004Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Se J.A., Weui B.J., Wan S.Y., Improvement of impulse response spectrum and its application, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Volume 288, Issues 4–5, Pages 1223–1239,, 20 December 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. H. Mak
    • 1
  • S. McWilliam
    • 1
  • A. A. Popov
    • 1
  • C. H. J. Fox
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials, Mechanics & Structures Division, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations