Skip to main content

ERP Diffusion and Assimilation Using IT-Innovation Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 29))

Abstract

This chapter introduces information technology (IT) frameworks as a mean of studying the IT “diffusion and assimilation” process. The chapter consists of three main sections; the first section introduces the reader to the topic and chapter structure, the second section defines the related terminologies in this field and illustrates the different frameworks and theories that explain and interpret the IT-innovation diffusion success. The third section formulates and proposes the specifications of a hybrid integrative conceptual framework for IT adoption and diffusion. This framework encompasses three main clusters: the external environment, the internal environment, and the technology characteristics. These clusters contain a total of 17 attributes drawn from the different theories and frameworks in this field and proven to be significant. Overall, the chapter serves several goals; it provides the reader with better understanding of IT-innovation diffusion theories, IT-assimilation practices, implementation pitfalls, and IT-diffusion practices trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CAT:

Consumer acceptance technology

CIP:

Cognitive instrumental process

DOI:

Diffusion of innovation theory

EDI:

Electronic data interchange

ERP:

Enterprise resource planning

IOS:

Interorganizational information systems

IS:

Information systems

IT:

Information technology

OLAP:

On-line analytical processing

PEU:

Perceived ease of use

PU:

Perceived usefulness

RD:

Result demonstrability

SET:

Sensory enabling technology

SN:

Subjective norms

TAM:

Technology acceptance model

TOE:

Technology–organization–environment

TPB:

Theory of planned behavior

TR:

Technology readiness

TRA:

Theory of reasoned action

TRI:

Technology readiness index

References

  • Alam, S., Khatibi, A., Ahmad, M., & Ishmail, H. (2007). Factors affecting E-commerce adoption in the electronic manufacturing companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 17(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghaunor, L., & Fotoh, X. (2006). Factors affecting ecommerce adoption in Nigerian banks. Jonkoping: Jonkoping International Business School Jonkoping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, S., Khatibi, A., Ahmad, M., & Ismail, H. (2005). Perceived benefits of e-commerce ­adoption in the electronic manufacturing companies in Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Gahtani, S. (2003). Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes. Information Technology for Development, 10, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsheikh, A., & Abu Khadra, H. (2009). Using maturity model to govern information technology. Utilizing information technology systems across disciplines: Advancements in the application of computer science. New York: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., Thomson, J., & Wynstra, F. (2000). Combining value and price to make purchase decisions in business markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARC Advisory Group. (2003). ARC white paper, www.arcweb.com. Accessed on July 13th 2009.

  • Baldwin, W., & Scott, J. (1987). Market structure and technological change. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of ­innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davis, P., & Williams, M. (2003). The diffusion of information systems development methods. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the ­implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P., & Tam, K. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. (2001). Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. (1994). Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2002). Information systems success revisited. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 02) (pp. 238–249), Big Island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems ­success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G., Jr., & Mohr, L. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 700–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J. (1983). Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing ­sector. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J., & Bridges, W. (1982). Environmental uncertainty and organizational technology policy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everdingen, Y.M. van & Waarts, E. (2003). The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewusi-Mensah, K. (1981). The external organizational environment and its impact on ­management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(4), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frambach, R., Barkema, H., Nooteboom, B., & Wedel, M. (1998). Adoption of a service ­innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply side variables. Journal of Business Research, 41(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frambach, R., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. (1989). Technology diffusion: An empirical test of competitive effects. Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemino, A., MacKay, N., & Reich, B. (2006). Executive decisions about website adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Information Technology Management, 17(1), 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, P., Donaldson, O., Tennant, V., & Black, K. (2008). An analysis of factors affecting the adoption of ICT by MSMEs in rural and urban Jamaica. 16th European conference on ­information systems. Galway, Ireland, 9–11 June. (pp. 1286–1297).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L., & Narayanan, V. (1984). Management accounting systems perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V. (1993) An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based inter-organizational systems. Decision Sciences, 24(3), 603–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M., & Porter, G. (2004). The impact of cognitive and other factors on the perceived ­usefulness of OLAP. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(2), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, H. (2006). Motivators for IOS adoption in Denmark. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 4(2), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, B., Jimenez, J., & Martin, M. (2008). Extending the technology acceptance model to include the IT decision maker: A study of business management software. Technovation, 28, 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond Culture, New York: Doubleday.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Thong, J., & Tam, K. (2006). Understanding continued IT usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile Internet. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1819–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou, C., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J., & Lacity, M. (2006). A review of predictors, linkages, and bias in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., Mann, J., & Rai, A. (2000). Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 631–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Sensory enabling technology acceptance model (SE-TAM): Multiple-group structural model comparison. Psychology and Marketing, 25(9), 901–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J., & Evanisko, M. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, ­organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulviwat, S., Gordon, C., Suzanne, A., & Terry, C. (2007). Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance of technology. Psychology and Marketing, 7(2), 1059-1-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M., & Chong, M. (2007). Professional students’ technology readiness, prior computing ­experience and acceptance of an e-learning system. Malaysian Accounting Review, 6(1), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M., Siti, N., & Kameel, A. (2004). Towards an electronic filing system: A Malaysian survey. E Journal of Tax Research, 2(1), 100–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S., Chiang, J., & Parasuraman, A. (2008). The effects of the dimensions of technology readiness on technology acceptance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(4), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., Levin, S., & Meisel, J. (1987). A dynamic analysis of the adoption of a new technology: The case of optical scanners. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H., Nilesh, S., Hu, Q., & Xu, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressure and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, B., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2004). Reasons behind ERP package adoption: A diffusion of innovations perspective. Proceedings of the twelfth European conference on information ­systems, Turku, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, H. (2004). A model of factors influencing electronic commerce adoption among small and medium enterprises in Brunei, Darussalam. International Journal of Information Technology, 10(1), 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K., & Damsgaard, J. (2001). What’s wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of diffusing software product and process innovations, Banff, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M., & Tanis, C. (2000). The enterprise system experience from adoption to success. Framing the domains of IT research: Projecting the future…through the past. Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1998). An electronics firm will save big money by replacing six people with one and will lose all this paperwork using the ERP software: But not every company has been so lucky. Fortune, 137(2), 149–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, M. (2008). The truth about innovation. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, J., Elliot, K.M., & Hall, M.C. (2010). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): Assessing CrossCultural Validity. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 22,19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millaire, J., Leger, P., Babin, G., & Pellertin, R. (2009). The effect of network exposure on the diffusion of enterprise systems. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Big island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1977). Strategy-making in context: Ten empirical archetypes. Journal of Management Studies, 14(3), 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, D. (2000). Enterprise resource planning systems: Systems, life cycle, electronic commerce and risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, M., & Jang, W. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology organization-environment framework: Taiwan’s communications industry. Journal of Computer Systems, April. (pp. 94–102).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2002). A stakeholder approach to electronic commerce diffusion. PhD ­thesis, Department of IS and computing, Brunel University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. (2001). Techno-ready marketing: How and why your customers adopt technology. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J., & Delbecq, A. (1977). Organization structure, individual attributes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Png, I., Tan, B., & Wee, K. (2001). Dimensions of national culture and corporate adoption of IT infrastructure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(1), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Crum, M. (1997). Determinants of EDI adoption in the ­transportation industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, the Internal Journal of Management Science, 27(4), 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. (2001). The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 12(2), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., & Bajwa, D. (1997). An empirical investigation into factors relating to the adoption of executive information systems: An analysis of EIS for collaboration and decision support. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 939–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R., & Slevin, D. (1975). Implementing operations research/management science. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G., Milford, M., Jewels, T., Hunter, T., & Hunter, B. (2000). Organizational readiness for ERP implementation. Proceedings of the sixth Americas conference on information systems. Long beach, California. (pp. 10–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansik, D. (1991). The processes of technological innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 16(1), 45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong, J. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L., & Klein, K. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-­implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upamaka, P., & Mahanty, B. (2007). Diffusion of technology in Indian research & development: A survey. Proceeding at third global conference on flexible system management. New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information ­technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vluggen, M. (2005). The determinants of enterprise resources planning (ERP) systems usage ­levels: An empirical study. Working paper at the 5th European conference on accounting ­information systems. Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information Management, 44, 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiki, York. (2010). http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Accessed on March 2010.

  • Wixom, B., & Todd, P. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology ­acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., & Subramaniam, C. (2009). Understanding RFID adoption in supply chain: An empirical study. Proceedings of forty-second Hawaii international conference on systems science. Big island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngberg, E., Olsen, D., & Hauser, K. (2009). Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment. International Journal of Information Management, 29, 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by ­organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003). Electronic business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on E-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., Xu, S., & Dedrick, J. (2004). Information technology payoff in e-business environments: An international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmud, R. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and ­formalization. Management Science, 28(12), 1421–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Husam Abu-Khadra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abu-Khadra, H., Ziadat, K. (2012). ERP Diffusion and Assimilation Using IT-Innovation Framework. In: Dwivedi, Y., Wade, M., Schneberger, S. (eds) Information Systems Theory. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 29. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9707-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics