Advertisement

An Introduction to Archaeologies of Internment

Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH)

Abstract

In this opening chapter, we introduce the developing field of archaeologies of internment. We first illustrate the prevalence of modern forms of institutional internment around the world since the final decades of the nineteenth century. Second, we offer a tentative definition of “internment” and describe what is meant by an “archaeology of internment,” including a review of previous research in the field. Third, we situate the archaeology of internment within an interdisciplinary context, and discuss some of its potential strengths and unique contributions. Fourth, and finally, we introduce and contextualize the chapters in this volume, and suggest some possible directions for future research.

Keywords

Material Culture Asylum Seeker Concentration Camp Historical Archaeology Geneva Convention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agamben, G. 1997 The Camp as the Nomos of the Modern. In Violence, Identity, and Self Determination, edited by H. De Vries and S. Weber, pp. 106–118. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  2. Applebaum, A. 2003 Gulag: A History. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Arct, B. 1995 Prisoner of War: My Secret Journal. Michael Joseph, London.Google Scholar
  4. Ashplant, T., G. Dawson, and M. Roper 2000 The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Austral Archaeology 1992 Loveday Internment Camp Archaeological Survey. Unpublished Report Prepared for the South Australian Department of Environment and Planning by Austral Archaeology.Google Scholar
  6. Avery, P.G., P.H. Garrow, J.A. Sichler, K.D. Hollenbach, and N.P. Herrmann 2008 Phase III Archaeological Investigations at 38FL2, The Florence Stockade, Florence, South Carolina. Unpublished Report Prepared by Mactec Engineering and Consulting for the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Cemetery Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, F. 1990 Archaeology, Habermas, and the Pathologies of Modernity. In Writing the Past in the Present, edited by F. Baker and J. Thomas, pp. 54–66. St. David’s University Press, Lampeter.Google Scholar
  8. Beisaw, A. and J. Gibb (eds.) 2009 The Archaeology of Institutional Life. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  9. Best, S. 1987 Auckland’s First Courthouse, Common Gaol and House of Correction: A Preliminary Report on The Initial Salvage Excavation. Unpublished Report Prepared for the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, Auckland Regional Committee.Google Scholar
  10. Best, S. 1992 The Queen Street Gaol: Auckland’s First Courthouse, Common Gaol and House of Correction (site R11/1559). Unpublished Report Prepared for the Department of Conservation, Auckland Conservancy.Google Scholar
  11. Bloch, A. and L. Schuster 2005 At the Extremes of Exclusion: Deportation, Detention and Dispersal. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(3): 491–512.Google Scholar
  12. Buchli, V. and G. Lucas (eds.) 2001 Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  13. Burström, M. 2009 Selective Remembrance: Memories of a Second World War Refugee Camp in Sweden. Norwegian Archaeological Review 42(2): 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton, J. 1996 Three Farewells to Manzanar. National Park Service Publications in Anthropology 67. Western Archaeological and Conservation Center, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  15. Burton, J., M. Farrell, F. Lord, and R. Lord 1999 Confinement and Ethnicity: An Overview of World War II Japanese American Relocation Sites. National Park Service Publications in Anthropology 74. Western Archaeological and Conservation Center, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  16. Bush, D. 2000 Interpreting the Latrines of the Johnson’s Island Civil War Military Prison. Historical Archaeology 34(1): 62–78.Google Scholar
  17. Bush, D. 2009 Maintaining or Mixing Southern Culture in a Northern Prison: Johnson’s Island Military Prison. In The Archaeology of Institutional Life, edited by A. Beisaw and J. Gibb, pp. 153–171. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, D. 2002 Atrocity, Memory, Photography: Imaging the Concentration Camps of Bosnia–The Case of ITN Versus Living Marxism, Part 2. Journal of Human Rights 1(2): 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casella, E. 1999 These Women Subject’d to Strict Separate Treatment: An Archaeology of Penal Confinement. Historic Environment 14(2): 11–16.Google Scholar
  20. Casella, E. 2000a “Doing Trade”: A Sexual Economy of 19th Century Australian Female Convict Prisons. World Archaeology 32(2): 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Casella, E. 2000b Bulldaggers and Gentle Ladies: Archaeological Approaches to Female Homosexuality in Convict Era Australia. In Archaeologies of Sexuality, edited by R. Schmidt and B. Voss, pp. 143–159. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  22. Casella, E. 2001a Every Procurable Object: A Functional Analysis of the Ross Female Factory Archaeological Collection. Australasian Historical Archaeology 19: 25–38.Google Scholar
  23. Casella, E. 2001b Landscapes of Punishment and Resistance: A Female Convict Settlement in Tasmania. In Contested Landscapes: Landscapes of Movement and Exile, edited by B. Bender and M. Winer, pp. 103–120. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Casella, E. 2001c To Watch or Restrain: Female Convict Prisons in 19th Century Tasmania. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5(1): 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Casella, E. 2001d Your Unfortunate and Undutiful Wife, Chained Letters: Convict Narratives. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Casella, E. 2005 Prisoner of His Majesty: Postcoloniality and the Archaeology of British Penal Transportation. World Archaeology 37(3): 453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Casella, E. 2007 The Archaeology of Institutional Confinement. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  28. Clark, B. 2008 Artifact Versus Relic: Ethics and the Archaeology of the Recent Past. Anthropology News 49(7): 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cucullu, G. 2009 Inside Gitmo: The True Story Behind the Myths of Guantánamo Bay. Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Davis, A. 2005 Abolition Democracy: Beyond Prisons, Torture, and Empire. Seven Stories Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Davis, A. and D. Rodriguez 2000 The Challenge of Prison Abolition: A Conversation. Social Justice 27(3): 212–218.Google Scholar
  32. Diken, B. and C. Laustsen 2005 Becoming Abject: Rape as a Weapon of War. Body & Society 11(1): 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Doughton, T. 1997 Unseen Neighbors: Native Americans of Central Massachusetts, A People Who Had “Vanished”. In After King Philip’s War, Presence and Persistence in Indian New England, edited by C. Calloway, pp. 207–230. University Press of New England, Hanover.Google Scholar
  34. Dow, M. 2004 American Gulag: Inside U.S. Immigration Prisons. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  35. Doyle, P., L. Babits, and J. Pringle 2010 Yellow Sands and Penguins: The Soil of “The Great Escape”. In Soil and Culture, edited by E. Landa and C. Feller, pp. 417–429. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dwork, D. and J. Van Pelt 1996 Auschwitz, 1270 to the Present. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Ellis, S. 2004 Camp Amache, Prowers County, Colorado: Site Management, Preservation, and Interpretive Plan. Unpublished Report Prepared by SWCA Cultural Resources (SWCA Project No. 6818-058 and Report No. 2004-48).Google Scholar
  38. Epperson, T. 2000 Panoptic Plantations: The Garden Sights of Thomas Jefferson and George Mason. In Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, edited by S. Mrozowski, J. Delle, and R. Paynter, pp. 58–77. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  39. Everdell, W. 1997 The First Moderns: Profiles in the Origins of Twentieth-Century Thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Fastabend, D., E. Hanlon, R.A. Route, and D. MacGhee 2004 Detainee Operations in a Joint Environment: Multi Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. United States Department of Defense, Washington.Google Scholar
  41. Firoze, M. and C. O’Coill 2002 The Missionary Position: NGOs and Development in Africa. International Affairs 78(3): 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fortenberry, B. and A. Myers (eds.) 2010 Special Journal Issue on “Perspectives on the Recent Past”. Archaeologies 6(1): 1–192.Google Scholar
  43. Francis, P. 2008 The World War I Internment Camp on Mount Revelstoke: First Archaeological Assessment. Report available from Cultural Resource Services, Western and Northern Service Centre Parks Canada Agency, Calgary.Google Scholar
  44. Funari, P., A. Zarankin, and M. Salerno 2009 Memories from Darkness: Archaeology of Repression and Resistance in Latin America. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Geneva Convention 1988 Geneva Convention for Revision of the Geneva Convention of 1906: Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War Signed at Geneva, July 27, 1929. In The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions, and Other Documents, edited by D. Schindler and J. Toman, pp. 341–364. Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  46. Gilead, I., Y. Haimi, and W. Mazurek 2009 Excavating Nazi Extermination Centres. Present Pasts 1: 10–39.Google Scholar
  47. González-Ruibal, A. 2007 Making Things Public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War. Public Archaeology 6(4): 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. González-Ruibal, A. 2008 Time to Destroy: An Archaeology of Supermodernity. Current Anthropology 49(2): 247–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gramsci, A. 1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence & Wishart, London.Google Scholar
  50. Grey, S. 2007 Ghost Plane: The Inside Story of the CIA’s Secret Rendition Programme. Janaca, Auckland Park.Google Scholar
  51. Harrison, R. and J. Schofield 2010 After Modernity: Archaeological Approaches to the Contemporary Past. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. Herz, J. 1948 The Fiasco of Denazification in Germany. Political Science Quarterly 63(4): 569–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hillier, B. and J. Hanson 1984 The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hirte, R. n.d. Found Objects, The Buchenwald and Mittelbau-Dora Memorials Foundation. http://www.buchenwald.de (Accessed 24 April 2010).
  55. Hobsbawm, E.J. 1994 The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. Michael Joseph, London.Google Scholar
  56. Human Rights Watch 2008 Locked Up Alone: Detention Conditions and Mental Health at Guantanamo. Human Rights Watch, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Kessler, S. 1999 The Black Concentration Camps of the Anglo-Boer War, 1899–1902: Shifting the Paradigm from Sole Martyrdom to Mutual Suffering. Historia 1(44): 110–147.Google Scholar
  58. Krell, A. 2002 The Devil’s Rope: A Cultural History of Barbed Wire. Reaktion Books, London.Google Scholar
  59. Kropotkin, P. 1927 Kropotkin’s Revolutionary Pamphlets. Vanguard Press, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Lindqvist, S. 1996 Exterminate All the Brutes. One Man’s Odyssey into the Heart of Darkness and the Origins of European Genocide. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Listman, J., C. Baker, and S. Goodfellow 2006 Historic Context: World War II Prisoner-of-War Camps on Department of Defense Installations. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program, Project Number 05-256. Department of Defense, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  62. Liu, J. 2009 Barbed Wire: The Fence that Changed the West. Mountain Press, Missoula.Google Scholar
  63. Logan, W. and K. Reeves 2009 Places of Pain and Shame: Dealing with “Difficult Heritage”. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  64. Malkki, L. 1995 Refugees and Exile: From “Refugee Studies” to the National Order of Things. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 495–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Margulies, J. 2006 Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Mears, D. 2008 An Assessment of Supermax Prisons Using an Evaluation Framework. The Prison Journal 88(1): 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meskell, L. and P. Pels 2005 Embedding Ethics. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  68. Morison, W. 1995 Flak and Ferrets: One Way to Colditz. Sentinel, London.Google Scholar
  69. Moshenska, G. 2007 Oral History in Historical Archaeology: Excavating Sites of Memory. Oral History 35(1): 91–97.Google Scholar
  70. Moshenska, G. 2008 Ethics and Ethical Critique in the Archaeology of Modern Conflict. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41(2): 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moshenska, G. 2010 Working with Memory in the Archaeology of Modern Conflict. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 20(1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Myers, A. 2008 Between Memory and Materiality: An Archaeological Approach to Studying the Nazi Concentration Camps. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 4: 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Myers, A. 2009 Canadian National Parks Internment Camp Archaeology Project: 2009 Field Season Final Research Report. Permit #JNP-2009-2217. Available from Parks Canada.Google Scholar
  74. Myers, A. 2010 Camp Delta, Google Earth and the Ethics of Remote Sensing in Archaeology. World Archaeology 4(3): 455–467.Google Scholar
  75. Netz, R. 2004 Barbed Wire: An Ecology of Modernity. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown.Google Scholar
  76. Pizarro, J. and V. Stenius 2004 Supermax Prisons: Their Rise, Current Practices, and Effect on Inmates. The Prison Journal 84(2): 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Price, J. 2005 Orphan Heritage: Issues in Managing the Heritage of the Great War in Northern France and Belgium. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 1(1): 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pringle, J., P. Doyle, and L. Babits 2007 Multidisciplinary Investigations at Stalag Luft III Allied Prisoner-of-War Camp: The Site of the 1944 “Great Escape,” Zagan, Western Poland. Geoarcheology: An International Journal 22(7): 729–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Purbrick, L., J. Aulich, and G. Dawson (eds.) 2007 Contested Spaces: Sites, Representations and Histories of Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  80. Razac, O. 2000 Barbed Wire: A Political History. The New Press, New York.Google Scholar
  81. Roland, C. 1991 Allied POWs, Japanese Captors and the Geneva Conventions. War and Society 9(2): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rose, D. 2004 Guantanamo: The War on Human Rights. The New Press, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Rürup, R. 1996 Topography of Terror: Gestapo, SS and Reichssicherheitshauptamt on the “Prinz-Albrecht-Terrain”: A Documentation. Verlag Willmuth Arenhövel, Berlin.Google Scholar
  84. Saunders, N. (ed.) 2004 Matters of Conflict: Material Culture, Memory and the First World War. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  85. Schofield, J. 2009 Aftermath: Readings in the Archaeology of Recent Conflict. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  86. Schofield, J., D. Evans, W. Foot, and C. Going 2006a Thematic Characterization: Recording England’s Army Camps, 1858–2000. In Re-Mapping the Field: New Approaches in Conflict Archaeology, edited by J. Schofield, A. Klausmeier, and L. Purbrick, pp. 58–63. Westkreuz-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  87. Schofield, J., W. Johnson, and C. Beck (eds.) 2002 Matériel Culture: The Archaeology of Twentieth Century Conflict. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  88. Schofield, J., A. Klausmeier, and L. Purbrick 2006b Re-Mapping the Field: New Approaches in Conflict Archaeology. Westkreuz-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  89. Shaw, V. 2010 Corrections and Punishment in China: Information and Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 26(1): 53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Skiles, S. and B. Clark 2010 When the Foreign Is Not Exotic: Ceramics at Colorado’s WWII Japanese Internment Camp. In Trade and Exchange: Archaeological Studies from History and Prehistory, edited by C. Dillian and C. White, pp. 179–192. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Spencer-Wood, S. and S. Baugher 2001 Introduction and Historical Context for the Archaeology of Institutions of Reform. Part I: Asylums. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5(1): 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Spiegelman, A. 2003 The Complete Maus. Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  93. Thomas, R. 2003a PoW Camps: What Survives and Where. Conservation Bulletin 44: 18–21.Google Scholar
  94. Thomas, R. 2003b Prisoner of War Camps (1939–1948). Project Report, Twentieth Century Military Recording Project. English Heritage, London.Google Scholar
  95. Thoms, A. (ed.) 2000 Uncovering Camp Ford: Archaeological Interpretations of a Confederate Prisoner-of-War Camp in East Texas. Unpublished Report of Investigations No.1, Center for Ecological Archaeology. Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
  96. Thoms, A. 2004 Sand Blows Desperately: Land-Use History and Site Integrity at Camp Ford, a Confederate POW Camp in East Texas. Historical Archaeology 38(4): 72–92.Google Scholar
  97. Valentine, G. and B. Longstaff 1998 Doing Porridge: Food and Social Relations in a Male Prison. Journal of Material Culture 3: 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Van Bueren, T. (ed.) 2006 Daring Experiments: Issues and Insights about Utopian Communities. Historical Archaeology 40(1): 1–186.Google Scholar
  99. Vance, J. 1992 The Politics of Camp Life: The Bargaining Process in Two German Prison Camps. War and Society 10(1): 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vance, J. (ed.) 2000 Encyclopedia of Prisoners of War and Internment. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  101. Vischer, A. 1919 Barbed Wire Disease: A Psychological Study of the Prisoner of War. John Bale, London.Google Scholar
  102. Waters, M. 2004 Lone Star Stalag: German Prisoners of War at Camp Hearne. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
  103. Williams, E. 1949 The Wooden Horse. Harper & Brothers, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Archaeology, University College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Stanford Archaeology Center, Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations