Toward a Northeast Asian Security Community: Implications for South Korea’s Economic Growth

Chapter
Part of the The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific book series (PEAP)

Abstract

At the beginning of the 1990s, there was a period when most people expected North Korea to collapse soon. To the contrary, North Korea has survived. There remain just a few experts now that argue for North Korea’s downfall in the near future; even with its economy fallen, the North has managed its regime since the 1990s.

Even if North Korea has survived harsh times since the 1990s, it still remains in a critical economic condition. Economically, the North has fallen in a poverty trap, from which the country cannot escape without help from others. An interesting thing today is that no country is in favor of North Korea’s abrupt collapse. It seems to be paradoxical that most countries do not want North Korea to collapse or to become stronger. Instead, they just want it to stay as is: keeping the status quo.

Keywords

Zinc Migration Graphite Depression Europe 

References

  1. Bank of Korea. 2004. Economic Impact of Gaesung Industrial Complex. The Bank of Korea. http://www.bok.or.kr
  2. Bae, Jin-Young. 1996. The Fiscal Burden of Korean Unification. Joint US–Korea Academic Studies, vol. 6. Washington, DC: Korea Economic Institute of America.Google Scholar
  3. Bibow, Jorg. 2001. The Economic Consequences of German Unification: The Impact of Misguided Macroeconomic Policies. Levy Economic Institute, Public Policy Brief no. 6. New York: Annandale-on- Hudson.Google Scholar
  4. BMWi. 1990. Wirtschafliche Hilfen für die bisherige DDR. Bonn.Google Scholar
  5. Frecaut, Dominique Dwor. 2003. Korean Unification: One Country Two Systems? In Confrontation and Innovation on the Korean Peninsula, 60–70. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Hong, Soon-Jik. 2004. Economic Meaning of Gaesung Industrial Complex and Tasks for Success. Korea: Hyundai Economic Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Hwang, Eui-Gak. 1993. The Korean Economies: A Comparison of North and South. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kim, Kyuryoon. 2005. Energy Cooperation with North Korea: Issues and Suggestions, Korea Institute for National Unification. Seoul.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, Young-yoon. 2005. Exploring North Korean Minerals: Strategy and Framework. Promotion Mining 2005 No. 2. P. 12.Google Scholar
  10. KINU. 2005. The meaning of Peace: Cost and Benefit. Analysis of Unification Environment 2005-17. Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, Joon-Koo. 1995. Reflections on Korean Unification Cost Studies. In Germany and Korea: Lessons in Unification eds. Myong-Kyu Kang and Helmut Wagner, 96–121. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, Young Sun. 1994. Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula: A Scenario Approach to the Cost of Unification. In Korean Economy at a Crossroad ed. Sung Yeung Kwack. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, Young Sun. 2002. The Cost and Financing of Korean Unification. In Handbook of Korean Unification eds. Jung-In Moon and J. B. Roh. Seoul: KERI.Google Scholar
  14. Noland, Marcus, Sherman Robinson, and Monica Scatasta 1997, Modeling Economic Reform in North Korea. Journal of Asian Economics 8, No. 1 (Spring):, 15–38.Google Scholar
  15. Oh, Hee-chan. 2005. Deposit of North Korean Minerals and Status of Development. Promotion Mining 2005 No. 2. P. 16.Google Scholar
  16. Peter, Gey. 2005. Money for the Reds – How Much and Why Did the Federal Republic of Germany Pay Money into the National Budget of the Federal Republic of Germany? FES-Information Series no. 2005-07. Korea: Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, Korea.Google Scholar
  17. Shin, Dong Cheon, Deok Ryong Yoon and Young Ju Jeong. 1998. Economic Cooperation and Unification Cost – Comparative Analysis Between Germanys and Korea Policy 97-15-336. Korea: Samsung Economic Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Wolf, Charles Jr. and Kamil Akramov. 2005. North Korean Paradoxes: Circumstances, Costs, and Consequences of Korean Unification. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korean Institute for International Economic PolicySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations