The Use of Kurtosis Measurement in the Assessment of Potential Noise Trauma
The current noise standards for the United States were originally formulated in 1968/1969 as part of the Walsh–Healy Act for Federal Contractors (U.S. Department of Labor 1969). The standards for a permissible noise exposure are based on data from a number of large-scale demographic studies of hearing loss in industrial settings in the United States and Europe (Burns and Robinson 1970; Baughn 1973; Passchier-Vermeer 1974).
Non-Gaussian noise composed of background lower level noise and intermittent higher level impacts or impulses or short bursts of higher level noise.
A unit is composed of 10 × sound (x)/reference sound. Note dB is an undefined term unless it has a suffix stating the reference, i.e.,
dB SPL: dB sound pressure level and the reference is 20 μbar pressure
dB SL: dB sensation level and the reference is the listener’s threshold for that specific sound.
Sound measurements made with an A-scale weighting on the sound level meter. Low-frequency sounds (less than 500 Hz) are negatively weighted with the A scale because low-frequency sound energy is not as damaging to the ear as sounds above 500 Hz.
(HTL) Hearing threshold levels are expressed in decibels relative to appropriate clinical norms.
A statistical parameter used in describing a distribution of a variable. It is this 4th moment of a distribution (see Fig. 4.1) and as kurtosis increases, more of the variance is due to infrequent extreme deviations (i.e., the impact and noise bursts in Fig. 4.2). Kurtosis is used in finance to describe the pattern of variation associated with a given stock or hedge fund.
Refers to the average sound level over an 8-h period. The Leq 8 h is the basic unit for noise assessment. A 4-h exposure of x dBA would be averaged over 8 h to determine the equivalent Leq 8 h.
Noise exposures are defined by both the intensity of noise (I) and the duration of the exposure (T) because hearing loss is related to both I and T. The trading relation refers to how I and T are combined. In the current U.S. standards (Table 4.1), for each 5-dB increase in exposure level there is a 50% decrease in time; therefore the trading relation is 5 dB. It should be noted that European noise standards have a 3-dB trading relation.
- Baughn, W. L. (1973). Relation between daily noise exposure and hearing loss based on evolution of 6,835 industrious noise exposure cases. Report No. AMRL-TR-73.53, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Mechanical Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Bruel, P. V. (1980). The influence of high crest factor noise on hearing damage. Scandinavian Audiological Supplement, 12, 25–32.Google Scholar
- Burns, W., & Robinson, D. W. (1970). An investigation of the effects of occupational noise on hearing. In J. J. Knight (Ed.), Hearing and noise in industry (pp. 177–192). London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
- Earshen, J. J. (1986). Sound measurement: Instrumentation and noise descriptors. In E. H. Berger, W. D. Ward, J. C. Morrill & L. H. Royster (Eds.), Noise and hearing conservation manual. Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association.Google Scholar
- Eldred, K. (1976). Demographics of noise pollution with respect to potential hearing loss. In D. Henderson, R. Hamernik, D. Dosanjh, & J. Mills (Eds.), Effects of noise on hearing. (pp. 3–20). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
- Eldredge, D. I. (1976). The problems of criteria for noise exposure. In D. Henderson, R. Hamernik, D. Dosanjh, & J. Mills (Eds.), Effects of noise on hearing. (pp. 3–20). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
- Gerges, S., & Casali, J. G. (2007). Hearing protectors. In M. Crocker (Ed.), Handbook of noise and vibration control. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Hamernik, R. P., & Henderson, D. (1976). The potentiation of noise by other ototraumatic agents. In D. Henderson, R. P. Hamernik, D. Dosanjh, & J. Mills (Eds.), Effects of noise on hearing. (pp. 291–308). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
- Hamernik, R. P., Turrentine, G., & Roberto, M. (1985). Mechanically induced morphological changes in the organ of Corti. In R. J. Salvi, D. Henderson, R. P. Hamernik, & V. Colletti (Eds.), Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss (pp. 69–84). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization, ISO 1999, Acoustics: Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimate of noise-induced hearing impairment. Geneva, Switzerland, 1990.Google Scholar
- Lataye, R., & Campo, P. (1996). Applicability of the L eq as a damage-risk criterion: An animal experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 1435–1444.Google Scholar
- Lei, S. F., Ahroon, W. A., & Hamernik, R. P. (1994). The application of frequency and time domain kurtosis to the assessment of hazardous noise exposures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1621–1632.Google Scholar
- MSHA, Health Standards for Occupational Noise Exposure; Final Rule. U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, 30 CFR Part 62. 64 Federal Register, 1999, 49548–49634, 49636–49637.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (1998). Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational noise exposure – revised criteria. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Publication no. 98–126.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2002). Exposure Assessment Methods: Research Needs and Priorities. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication no. 2002–126.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2007). Best practices workshop on impulsive noise and its effect on hearing. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Journal of Noise Control Engineering, 53(2)Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Labor (1969). Occupational noise exposure. Federal Register, 34, 7891–7954.Google Scholar
- Ward, W. D., Fleer, R. E., & Glorig, A. (1961). Characteristics of hearing loss produced by gun fire and by steady state noise. Journal of Auditory Research, 1, 325–356.Google Scholar