Hearing Protection Devices: Regulation, Current Trends, and Emerging Technologies
Hearing protection devices (HPDs), used to guard the human ear against incurring hearing loss due to noise, have been in existence at least since the early 1900s even though their use in United States (U.S.) workplaces was not regulated by law until 1971. In fact, in 1911, the famous band leader John Phillip Sousa complained to his friend and fellow skeet trapshooter J. A. R. Elliott that shooting traps “took a toll on his ears and was beginning to affect his livelihood [as a musician].” Elliott, being an inventor, then developed and patented (in eight countries, no less), the “Elliott Perfect Ear Protector,” and it became a commercial success (Baldwin 2004). After using the “Elliott Protector,” which was among the first commercially available hearing protectors, Sousa wrote in a letter to Elliott on January 20, 1913: “I consider your invention to lessen the shock of loud noises or overwhelming vibrations of sound of great comfort. The Elliott Perfect Ear Protector is a great success in affording protection from concussions to a sensitive ear. As a shock absorber it is invaluable” (Baldwin 2004). Unfortunately, U.S. industrial workers did not experience common use of effective hearing protection technology until many years later, even though simple cotton plugs were known to be used in some workplaces before the turn of the nineteenth century (e.g., Barr 1896). (Even today, some individuals incorrectly assume that cotton suffices as a hearing protector.) The lack of protection in early mechanized industries, coupled with high noise exposures, resulted in hearing loss and related problems, such as tinnitus, that manifested in workers and that, very tragically, were often viewed as an accepted consequence of the occupation. As such, the terms “blacksmith’s deafness” and “boilermaker’s ear” were coined (Fosboke 1831; Holt 1882; Berger 2003a).
KeywordsNoise Exposure Personal Protective Equipment Attenuation Data Hearing Protection Noise Annoyance
- ANSI (1974). Method for the Measurement of Real-Ear Protection of Hearing Protectors and Physical Attenuation of Earmuffs. Standard S3.19-1974. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- ANSI (2007). Methods of Estimating Effective A-Weighted Sound Pressure Levels When Hearing Protectors are Worn. Standard S12.68-2007. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- ANSI (2008). Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors. Standard S12.6-1997(R2008). New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- ANSI (2010). Methods for the Measurement of Insertion Loss of Hearing Protection Devices in Continuous or Impulsive Noise Using Microphone-In-Real-Ear or Acoustic Test Fixture Procedures. S12.42-1995(R2010). New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- ASHA (2009). Noise and hearing loss – Noise is difficult to define! Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/public/hearing/disorders/noise.htm.
- Baldwin, D. (2004) J.A.R Elliott, premier trapshooter. Trap and Field, July, 104. (Also : http://www.traphof.org/roadtoyesterday/elliott-JAR.htm).
- Barr, T. (1896). Manual of diseases of the ear. Glasgow, Scotland: James Maclehose and Sons.Google Scholar
- Berger, E. H. (2003a). Noise control and hearing conservation: Why do it? In E. H. Berger, L. H. Royster, J. D. Royster, D. P. Driscoll, & M. Layne (Eds.), The noise manual, (Revised 5th ed., pp. 2–17)., Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association. 2–Google Scholar
- Berger, E. H. (2003b). Hearing protection devices. In E. H. Berger, L. H. Royster, J. D. Royster, D. P. Driscoll, & M. Layne (Eds.), The noise manual, (Revised 5th ed., pp. 379–454). Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association. 9–Google Scholar
- Berger, E. H., Franks, J. R., Behar, A., Casali, J. G., Dixon-Ernst, C., Kieper, R. W., Merry, C. J., Mozo, B. T., Nixon, C. W., Ohlin, D., Royster, J. D., & Royster, L. H. (1998). Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices, Part III: The validity of using subject-fit data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(2), 665–672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Casali, J. G. (1990). Listening closely to the noise of monster trucks. Roanoke Times and World News, March 5, 1990, p. A11.Google Scholar
- Casali, J. G. (2010a). Passive augmentations in hearing protection technology circa 2010 including flat-attenuation, passive level-dependent, passive wave resonance, passive adjustable attenuation, and adjustable-fit devices: Review of design, testing, and research. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 15(4), 187–195.Google Scholar
- Casali, J. G. (2010b). Powered electronic augmentations in hearing protection technology circa 2010 including Active Noise Reduction, electronically-modulated sound transmission, and tactical communications devices: Review of design, testing, and research. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 15, 168–186.Google Scholar
- Casali, J. G., & Robinson, G. S. (2003). Augmented hearing protection devices: Active noise reduction, level-dependent, sound transmission, uniform attenuation, and adjustable devices—technology overview and performance testing issues. EPA Docket OAR-2003–0024, Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Hearing Protection Devices, March 27–28. Also at: www.regulations.gov, reference Docket OAR-2003–0024.
- Casali, J. G., & Gerges, S. (2006). Protection and enhancement of hearing in noise. In R. C. Williges (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, (Vol. 2, pp. 195–240). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 5–Google Scholar
- Casali, J. G., & Lancaster, J. A. (2008). Quantification and solutions to impediments to speech communication and signal detection in the construction industry. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Technical Report 200803, (Audio Lab 4/15/08–3–HP), April 15.Google Scholar
- Casali, J. G., & Keady, J. P. (2010). In-field localization of gunshots in azimuth under two prototype etymotic and two production Aearo-Peltor hearing protection enhancement devices intended for military ground soldier applications. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech ISE Department Technical Report 201003, IRDL-Audio Lab Number 6/30/10–3–HP), June 30.Google Scholar
- Department of the Air Force (1948). Precautionary measures against noise hazards. AFR 160–3, Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force.Google Scholar
- EPA. (1979). Noise labeling requirements for hearing protectors. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR 211, Federal Register, 44(190), 56130–56147.Google Scholar
- EPA. (2009). EPA Docket OAR-2003–0024. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency workshop on hearing protection devices. Washington, DC, March 27–28. Retrieved from www.regulations.gov, reference Docket OAR-2003–0024.
- Holt, E. E. (1882). Boiler-maker’s deafness and hearing in noise. Transactions of American Otology Society, 3, 34–44.Google Scholar
- McKinley, R. (2001). Future aircraft carrier noise. Proceedings of the International Military Noise Conference, Baltimore, MD, April 24–26.Google Scholar
- MSHA (1999). Health Standards for Occupational Noise Exposure; Final Rule. Mine Safety and Health Administration. 30 CFR Part 62, 64. Federal Register.Google Scholar
- OSHA (1971a). Occupational Noise Exposure (General Industry). Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 29 CFR 1910.95, Federal Register.Google Scholar
- OSHA (1971b). Occupational Noise Exposure (Construction Industry). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR 1926.52. Federal Register. Google Scholar
- OSHA (1971c). Hearing Protection (Construction Industry). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR 1926.101. Federal Register. Google Scholar
- OSHA (1983). Occupational Noise Exposure; Hearing Conservation Amendment; Final Rule. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR 1910.95. Federal Register.Google Scholar
- Robinson, G. S., & Casali, J. G. (2003). Speech communications and signal detection in noise. In E. H. Berger, L. H. Royster, J. D. Royster, D. P. Driscoll, & M. Layne (Eds.), The noise manual (Revised 5th ed., pp. 567–600). Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association. 7–Google Scholar
- Suter, A. H. (1989). The effects of hearing protectors on speech communication and the perception of warning signals (AMCMS Code 611102.74A0011), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
- WHO (1997). Prevention of noise-induced hearing, Report of a consultation at the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, October 28–30.Google Scholar