Nonlinear Parameteric Health Monitoring for Vibrating Structures Under Non-Stationary Excitation
Nonlinear system identification has been used to predict and monitor cracks as they form, propagate, and eventually cause the catastrophic failure of a vibrating cantilevered beam. The Continuous Time based system identification technique allows for estimation of model parameters based on collected stimulus and response data. For this study the estimated cubic stiffness term in the model is mapped as a function of time. The purpose of this investigation is to strengthen results from a previous study  through repetition, and to expand the scope of this system identification technique. This study mainly explores the effectiveness of using nonstationary excitation in the identification process, with an understanding that in implementation on real systems the selection input amplitude and frequency may not be readily controlled. Additionally, the robustness of this method is demonstrated in direct comparison to a wellaccepted linear-based approach. The results show this method to be successful with little prior knowledge of the accurate model form or parametric values for the systems being studied.
KeywordsFatigue Sine Acoustics Timothy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Doughty, T. A. and Higgins, N. S., “Effect of Nonlinear Parametric Model Accuracy in Crack Prediction and Detection”, SEM Annual Conference & Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Indianapolis, 2010.Google Scholar
- 6.Gudmundson, P., “Changes in Modal Parameters Resulting from Small Cracks,” Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference and Exhibit 2, 1984, pp. 690–697.Google Scholar
- 12.Sih, G.C., Tzou, D.Y., “Mechanics of Nonlinear Crack Growth: Effects of Specimen Size and Loading Step,” Martinus Nijhoff Publications, 1984, pp. 155–169.Google Scholar
- 13.Bovsunovsky, A. and Bovsunovsky, O., “Crack Detection in Beams by Means of the Driving Force Parameters Variation at Non-Linear Resonance Vibrations”, Key Engineering Materials, v 347, Damage Assessment of Structures VII, 2007, pp. 413–420.Google Scholar
- 14.Andreaus, U., Casini, P., Vestroni, F., “Nonlinear Features In The Dynamic Response of a Cracked Beam Under Harmonic Forcing,” Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005, v 6 C, 5th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, 2005, pp. 2083–2089.Google Scholar
- 15.Wowk, V., Machinery Vibration Measurement and Analysis, McGraw Hill, Inc. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
- 16.Crespo da Silva, M. R. M. and Glynn, C. C., “Nonlinear Flexural-Flexural-Torsional Dynamics of Inextensional Beams, II. Forced Motions,” International Journal of Solids and Structures 6, 1978, pp. 449–461.Google Scholar
- 18.Doughty, Timothy A., System Identification of Modes in Nonlinear Structures. PhD Thesis, Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, 2002.Google Scholar
- 19.Doughty, T. A. and Leineweber, M. J., “Investigating Nonlinear Models for Health Monitoring in Vibrating Structures”, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 2009.Google Scholar