Abstract
Attitudes about drinking and driving have changed dramatically over the past few decades due to a combination of factors. Initiatives to address impaired driving have varied from harsher penalties to substance abuse treatment responses. This article reviews what works, what doesn’t, what is inconclusive, and what looks promising for the future including traditional police responses such as sobriety checkpoints and vehicle or license sanctions. Victim Impact Panels and other more innovative initiatives have mixed reviews. Knowing that severity of sentences does not affect long term change, the criminal justice system has initiated robust programs that look promising. Courts are using new technologies and pharmacological responses to monitor offenders and reduce recidivism. Over the past ten years, Driving While Impaired (DWI) courts have sprung up throughout the United States and look to be an important part of the goal of reduced impaired driving and resulting crashes.
Keywords
- Alcohol
- Drunk driving
- Driving under the influence
- DWI
- Impaired driving
- Vehicle impoundment
- Drivers’ license restrictions
- Drivers’ license revocation
- Drivers’ license suspension
- NHTSA
- Victim impact panels
- Victim advocacy
- Drug courts
- Drug treatment courts
- Repeat offenders
- Sobriety courts
- Driving while impaired courts
- Problem-solving courts
This work was written by the author in his individual capacity and is not a work of the US Government, Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. It represents his views alone.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This work was written by the author in his individual capacity and is not a work of the US Government, Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. It represents his views alone.
References
American University Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project. (2000). Adult drug court treatment provider survey, January–March 2000 (pp. 28–29). Washington, DC: Author.
Beck, K., Rauch, W., Baker, E., & Williams, A. (1999). Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: A random trial in Maryland. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1696–1700.
Beirness, D. J., Simpson, H. M., Mayhew, D. R., & Jonah, B. J. (1997). The impact of administrative license suspension and vehicle impoundment for DWI in Manitoba. In C. Mercier-Guyon (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety (pp. 919–925). Annecy, France: Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches en Medecine du Trafic.
Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 1–42.
Belenko, S. (2001, May). Research on drug courts: A critical review. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University.
Blomberg, R. (1992). Lower BAC limits for youth: Evaluation of the Maryland. 02 law (DOT HS 806 807). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
Borkenstein, R. F. (1975). Problems of enforcement, adjudication and sanctioning. In S. Israelstam & S. Lambert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety, September 8–13, 1974 (pp. 655–662). Toronto, ON: Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario.
Breckenridge, J. F., Winfree, L. T., Maupin, J. R., & Clason, D. L. (2000). Drunk drivers, DWI “Drug Court” treatment, and recidivism: Who fails? Justice Research and Policy, 2(1), 87–105.
Cleary, J., & Rodgers, A. (1986). Analysis of the effects of recent changes in Minnesota’s DWI laws: Part III. Longitudinal analysis of policy impacts. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota House of Representatives, Research Department.
Coppin, R. S., & Oldenbeek, G. (1965). Driving under suspension and revocation: A study of suspended and revoked drivers classified as negligent operators. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Crosby, I. B. (1995). Portland’s asset forfeiture program: The effectiveness of vehicle seizure in reducing rearrest among “problem” drunk drivers. Portland, OR: Reed College Public Policy Workshop.
deBaca, J. C., Lapham, S. C., Liang, H. C., & Skipper, B. J. (2001). Victim impact panels: Do they impact drunk drivers? A follow-up of female and male first-time and repeat offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 615–620.
DeYoung, D. J. (1997a). An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction, 92(8), 989–997.
DeYoung, D. J. (1997b, November). An evaluation of the specific deterrent effect on vehicle impoundment on suspended, revoked, and unlicensed drivers in California (DOT HS 808 727). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
DeYoung, D. J. (1998). An evaluation of the general deterrent effects of vehicle impoundment on suspended and revoked drivers in California (RSS-98-180). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
DeYoung, D. J. (2000). An evaluation of the general deterrent effects of vehicle impoundment on suspended and revoked drivers in California. Journal of Safety Research, 31(2), 51–59.
DeYoung, D. J., Peck, R. C., & Helander, C. J. (1997). Estimating the exposure and fatal crash rates of suspended/revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(1), 17–23.
Dill, P. L., & Wells-Parker, E. (2006). Court-mandated treatment for convicted drinking drivers. Alcohol Research and Health, 29(1), 41–48.
Donovan, D. M., Kadden, R. M., DiClemente, C. C., Carroll, K. M., Longabaugh, R., Zweben, A., et al. (1994). Issues in the selection and development of therapies in alcoholism treatment matching research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement, 12, 138–148.
Epperlein, T. (1987). Initial deterrent effects of the crackdown on drunken drivers in the state of Arizona. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 19(4), 271–283.
Falkowski, C. L. (1984). The impact of two-day jail sentences for drunk drivers in Hennepin County, Minnesota (DOT HS 806 839). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Fell, J. C., & Voas, R. (2006a). The effectiveness of reducing illegal blood alcohol concentration limits for driving: Evidence for lowering the limit to .05 BAC. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 233–243.
Fell, J. C., & Voas, R. B. (2006b). Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD): The first 25 years. Traffic Injury Prevention, 7(3), 195–212.
Fox, C., & Huddleston, W. (2003). Drugs in the U.S. Issues of Democracy, 8(1), 13–19.
Freeman-Wilson, K., & Wilkosz, M. P. (2002). Drug court publications resource guide (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
Fuller, B., Carey, S., & Kissick, K. (2007). Michigan DUI Courts outcome evaluation: Final report. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Green, R. E., French, J. F., Haberman, P. W., & Holland, P. W. (1991). The effects of combining sanctions and rehabilitation for driving under the influence: An evaluation of the New Jersey Alcohol Countermeasures Program. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23(6), 543–555.
Griffin, L. I., III, & DeLaZerda, S. (2000). Unlicensed to kill. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Guerin, P., & Pitts, W. J. (2002). Evaluation of the Bernalillo County Metropolitan DWI/Drug Court: Final report. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico, Center for Applied Research and Analysis.
Hagen, R. E. (1977). Effectiveness of license suspension or revocation for drivers convicted of multiple driving-under-the-influence offenses. Sacramento, CA: Department of Motor Vehicles.
Hingson, R., Heeren, T., & Winter, M. (1994). Lower legal blood alcohol limits for young drivers. Public Health Reports, 109(6), 739–744.
Hingson, R., Howland, J., Heeren, T., & Winter, M. (1992). Reduced BAC limits for young people (impact on night fatal) crashes. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 7(2), 117–127.
Irvin, J. E., Bowers, C. A., Dunn, M. E., & Wang, M. C. (1999). Efficacy of relapse prevention: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 563–570.
Jones, R. L., & Lacey, J. H. (1998, December). Evaluation of an individualized sanctioning program for DWI offenders (DOT HS 808 842). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Jones, R. K., & Lacey, J. H. (2002, November). Alcohol and highway safety 2001: A review of the state of knowledge (Final Report DOT HS 809 383). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Jones, R. K., Wiliszowski, C. H., & Lacey, J. H. (1996). Evaluation of alternative programs for repeat DWI offenders (DOT HS 808 493). Washington, DC: Office of Program Development and Evaluation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Klein, T. M. (1989). Changes in alcohol-involved fatal crashes associated with tougher state alcohol legislation (DOT HS 807 511). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Kunitz, S. J., Woodall, W. G., Zhao, H., Wheeler, D. R., Lillis, R., & Rogers, E. (2002). Rearrest rates after incarceration for DWI: A comparative study in a southwestern U.S. county. American Journal of Public Health, 92(11), 1826–1831.
Lacey, J. H., Jones, R. K., & Wiliszowski, C. H. (2000, June). Zero-tolerance laws for youth: Four states’ experience (DOT HS 809 053). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Lacey, J. H., Rudisill, L. C., Popkin, C. L., & Stewart, J. R. (1986). Education for drunk drivers: How well has it worked in North Carolina? Popular Government, 51(3), 44–48.
Leaf, W. A., & Preusser, D. F. (2011, January). Evaluation of Minnesota’s vehicle plate impoundment law for impaired drivers, (DOT HS 811 351). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Levy, D., Asch, P., & Shea, D. (1990). An assessment of county programs to reduce driving while intoxicated. Health Education Research, 5, 247–255.
Levy, D., Shea, D., & Asch, P. (1988). Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 291–293.
Levy, P., Voas, R. B., Johnson, P., & Klein, T. M. (1978). An evaluation of the Department of Transportation’s alcohol safety action projects. Journal of Safety Research, 10(4), 162–176.
Little, J. W. (1975). Administration of justice in drunk driving cases. Gainesville, FL: The University Presses of Florida.
Mann, R. E., Anglin, L., Wilkins, K., Vingilis, E. R., MacDonald, S., & Sheu, W. J. (1994). Rehabilitation for convicted drinking drivers (second offenders): Effects on morality. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55(3), 372–374.
Martell, C. A., Stewart, J. R., & Jamburajan, S. (1998). DWI evaluation and query system: Final report. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
McCartt, A. T., Geary, L. L., & Nissen, W. J. (2002, August). Observational study of the extent of driving while suspended for alcohol-impaired driving (DOT HS 809 491). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
McKnight, A. J., & Voas, R. B. (1991). The effect of license suspension upon DWI recidivism. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 7(1), 43–54.
Miller, W. R., & Wilbourne, P. L. (2002). Mesa grande: A methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatments for alcohol use disorders. Addiction, 97(3), 265–277.
Moyer, A., Finney, J. W., Swearingen, C. E., & Vergun, P. (2002). Brief interventions for alcohol problems: A meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction, 97(3), 279–292.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2009a). Traffic safety facts: 2008 Traffic safety annual assessment – Highlights (DOT HS 811 172). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2009b). Traffic safety facts: Results of the 2007 National roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers (DOT HS 811 175). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Nichols, J. L., & Ross, H. L. (1990). The effectiveness of legal sanctions in dealing with drinking drivers. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 6(2), 33–55.
Nochajski, T. H., Miller, B. A., Wieczorek, W. F., & Whitney, R. (1993). The effect of a drinker-driver treatment program: Does criminal history make a difference? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(2), 174–189.
Peck, R. C. (1991). General and specific deterrent effects of DUI sanctions: A review of California’s experience. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 7(1), 13–42.
Peck, R. C., Sadler, D. D., & Perrine, M. W. (1985). The comparative effectiveness of alcohol rehabilitation and licensing control actions for drunk driving offenders: A review of the literature. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving: Abstracts and Reviews, 1(4), 15–40.
Peck, R., & Voas, R. (2002). Forfeiture programs in California: Why so few? Journal of Safety Research, 33(2), 245–258.
Polacsek, M., Rogers, E. M., Woodall, W. G., Delaney, H., Wheeler, D., & Nagesh, R. (2001). MADD victim impact panels and stages-of-change in drunk-driving prevention. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 344–350.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114.
Project MATCH Research. (1998). Matching patients with alcohol disorders to treatments: Clinical implications from Project MATCH. Journal of Mental Health 7(6), 589–602.
Rempel, M., Fox-Kralstein, D., Cissner, A., Cohen, R., Labriola, M., Farole, D., et al. (2003). The New York State adult drug court evaluation: Policies, participants and impacts. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
Rider, R., Kelley-Baker, T., Voas, R., Murphy, B., McKnight, A. J., & Levings, C. (2006). The impact of a novel educational curriculum for first-time DUI offenders on intermediate outcomes relevant to DUI recidivism. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(3), 482–489.
Rider, R. P., Voas, R. B., Kelley-Baker, T., Grosz, M., & Murphy, B. (2007). Preventing alcohol-related convictions (PARC): The impact of a novel curriculum for first-time offenders on DUI recidivism. Traffic Injury Prevention, 8(2), 147–152.
Robertson, R. D., & Simpson, H. M. (2002, June). DWI system improvements for dealing with hard core drinking drivers: Prosecution. Ottawa, ON: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.
Ross, H. L. (1982). Prevention and deterrence: The international experience. Alcohol Health and Research World, 7(1), 26–30, 39–43.
Ross, H. L. (1992). Are DWI sanctions effective? Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 8(1), 61–69.
Ross, H., & Gonzales, P. (1988). The effect of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 20(5), 379–391.
Ross, H. L., & Klette, H. (1995). Abandonment of mandatory jail for impaired drivers in Norway and Sweden. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(2), 151–157.
Ross, H. L., McCleary, R., & LaFree, G. (1990). Can mandatory jail laws deter drunk driving? The Arizona case. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81(1), 156–170.
Ross, H. L., & Voas, R. B. (1989). The New Philadelphia story: The effects of severe penalties for drunk driving. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Ross, H. L., & Voas, R. B. (1990). The New Philadelphia story: The effects of severe punishment for drunk driving. Law and Policy, 12(1), 51–79.
Sadler, D. D., & Perrine, M. W. (1984). The long-term traffic safety impact of a pilot alcohol abuse treatment as an alternative to license suspensions, Volume 2. An evaluation of the California drunk driving countermeasure system. Sacramento, CA: Department of Motor Vehicles.
Safir, H., Grasso, G., & Messner, R. (2000, May 22–26). The New York City police department DWI forfeiture initiative – Prevention section. In H. Laurell & F. Schlyter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety – T 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 837–840). Stockholm: ICADTS.
Shinar, D., & Compton, R. (1995). Victim impact panels: Their impact on DWI recidivism. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 11(1), 73–87.
Socie, E. M., Wagner, S. A., & Hopkins, R. S. (1997). The relative effectiveness of sanctions applied to first-time drunken driving offenders. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(2), 85–90.
Stewart, E. I., & Malfetti, J. L. (1970). Rehabilitation of the drunken driver: A corrective course in Phoenix, Arizona, for persons convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. New York: Teachers College Press.
Swearingen, C. E., Moyer, A., & Finney, J. W. (2003). Alcoholism treatment outcome studies, 1970–1998. An expanded look at the nature of the research. Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 415–436.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1999, January). 1999 annual report of the California DUI Management Information System (CAL-DMV-RSS-99-179). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles, Research and Development Section.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (2000). Annual report of the California DUI Management Information System. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tauber, J., & Huddleston, C. W. (1999). DUI/drug courts: Defining a national strategy. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs. (2009, December). Mechanisms of action in alcoholism treatment. ISAP News 7(Issue 2).
Voas, R. B. (1981). Results and implications of the ASAPs. In L. Goldberg (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety – T80, June 15–19, 1980, Stockholm (Vol. 3, pp. 1129–1144). Göteborg, Sweden: Graphic Systems.
Voas, R. B. (1986). Evaluation of jail as a penalty for drunken driving. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving: Abstracts and Reviews, 2(2), 47–70.
Voas, R. B. (1992, June). Assessment of impoundment and forfeiture laws for drivers convicted of DWI. Phase I report: Review of state laws and their application (DOT HS 807 870). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Voas, R. B. (2001). Have the courts and the motor vehicle departments adequate power to control the hard-core drunk driver? Addiction, 96(12), 1701–1707.
Voas, R. B., & DeYoung, D. J. (2002). Vehicle action: Effective policy for controlling drunk and other high-risk drivers? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(3), 263–270.
Voas, R. B., & Fisher, D. A. (2001). Court procedures for handling intoxicated drivers. Alcohol Research and Health World, 25(1), 32–42.
Voas, R. B., & McKnight, A. J. (1989). An evaluation of hardship licensing for DWIs (Contract No. DTNH22-34-C-07292). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Voas, R., McKnight, A. S., & Tippetts, A. S. (2006, May). DWI offenders’ failure to reinstate driver’s licenses: Volume 1 – Summary (Draft final report). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Voas, R. B., Rhodenizer, A. E., & Lynn, C. (1985). Evaluation of Charlottesville checkpoint operations (Final Report DOT HS 806 989). Washington, DC: (Available in hard copy format only from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Voas, R. B., & Tippetts, A. S. (1995). Evaluation of Washington and Oregon license plate sticker laws. Proceedings of the 39th annual proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM) (pp. 29–44). Des Plaines, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., & Fell, J. C. (2000). The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32(4), 483–492.
Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., & Fell, J. (2003). Assessing the effectiveness of minimum legal drinking age and zero tolerance laws in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 579–587.
Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., & Lange, J. E. (1997). Evaluation of a method for reducing unlicensed driving: The Washington and Oregon license plate sticker laws. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(5), 627–634.
Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., & Taylor, E. P. (1997). Temporary vehicle immobilization: Evaluation of a program in Ohio. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(5), 635–642.
Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., & Taylor, E. P. (1998). Temporary vehicle impoundment in Ohio: A replication and confirmation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(5), 651–655.
Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., & Taylor, E. P. (2000, October). Effectiveness of the Ohio vehicle action and administrative license suspension laws (Final Report DOT HS 809 000). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Wagenaar, A. C., Maldonado-Molina, M. M., Erickson, D. J., Ma, L., Tobler, A. L., & Komro, K. A. (2007, September). General deterrence effects of U.S. statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: Long-term follow-up in 32 states. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(5), 982–994.
Wagenaar, A. C., Zobeck, T. S., Hingson, R., & Williams, G. D. (1995). Studies of control efforts: A meta-analysis from 1960 through 1991. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 1–16.
Warren, R. K. (2007). Arming the Courts with research: 10 Evidence-based sentencing initiatives to control crime and reduce costs. PEW Foundation Public Policy Brief, May 2009. Washington, DC: The PEW Charitable Trusts. (Originally published in the 2007 issue of the Indiana Law Journal)
Wells, J. K., Preusser, D. F., & Williams, A. F. (1992). Enforcing alcohol-impaired driving and seat belt use laws, Binghamton, New York. Journal of Safety Research, 23, 63–71.
Wells-Parker, E., Bangert-Drowns, R., McMillen, R., & Williams, M. (1995). Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction, 90(7), 907–926.
Wells-Parker, E., & Williams, M. (2002). Enhancing the effectiveness of traditional interventions with drinking drivers by adding brief individual intervention components. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(6), 655–664.
Wheeler, D. R., Rogers, E. M., Tonigan, J. S., & Woodall, W. G. (2004). Effectiveness of customized Victim Impact Panels on first-time DWI offender inmates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(1), 29–35.
Williams, R. L., Hagen, R. E., & McConnell, E. J. (1984). A survey of suspension and revocation effects on the drinking-driver offender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16(5/6), 339–350.
Zador, P. L. (1991). Alcohol-related relative risk of fatal driver injuries in relation to driver age and sex. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(4), 302–310.
Zobeck, T. S., & Williams, G. D. (1994). Evaluation synthesis of the impacts of DWI laws and enforcement methods: Final report (Contract No. ADM-281-89-0002). Rockville, MD: Office of Policy Analysis, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA).
Zwerling, C., & Jones, M. P. (1999). Evaluation of the effectiveness of low blood alcohol concentration laws for younger drivers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(1 Suppl), 76–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chodrow, B., Hora, H.P.F. (2011). DWI/DUI Interventions. In: Leukefeld, C., Gullotta, T., Gregrich, J. (eds) Handbook of Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Treatment in Criminal Justice Settings. Issues in Children's and Families' Lives, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9470-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9470-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9469-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9470-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)