Whole Person Care: Conclusions

  • Tom A. HutchinsonEmail author


Is whole person care a clear solution to problems plaguing twenty-first century medicine, including the paradox that we have more security, health, and material comfort, and live longer than humans at any other time in history, and at the same time appear to be more unhappy, anxious, and dissatisfied than ever before? We believe that mindful whole person care is a solution to the problem of unhappy patients who increasingly complain about the care they are receiving and to healthcare workers who are increasingly stressed out and burned out on the job [1], despite greater technological ability to solve medical problems than has ever been available to mankind. The solution that we are suggesting is not window dressing or simply better manners, but a change in the patient–healthcare worker relationship that takes lessons from the palliative care movement and applies them in a much wider context. But make no mistake, whole person care is not palliative care by another name, but a new paradigm for practicing medicine that is relevant to all parts and specialties of medical practice.


Burned out Cicely Saunders Therapeutic relationship Hierarchy Vulnerability Mortality Chronic disease End-stage kidney disease Chronic kidney failure Dichotomy Algorithm Surgeon Synergistic Placebo Longings Expectations 


  1. 1.
    Spickard Jr A, Gabbe SG, Christensen JF. Mid-career burnout in generalist and specialist physicians. JAMA. 2002;288(12):1447–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark D. Part 2, The expansive years (1968-1985). In: Cicely Saunders – founder of the Hospice movement. Selected letters 1959-1999. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 127–33.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark D. Cicely Saunders – founder of the Hospice movement. Selected letters 1959-1999. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. V–VII (Mount B, Foreword).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saunders C. A therapeutic community: St. Cristopher’s Hospice. In: Schoenberg B, Carr AC, Peretz D, Kutschereds AH, editors. Psychosocial aspects of terminal care. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1972. p. 275–89.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kearney M. Mortally wounded. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1997. p. 13–4 (Saunders C, Foreword).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, Hofman KJ. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA. 2004;291:2616–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Canadian Organ Replacement Register. 1999 Report. Vol. 1, Dialysis and renal transplantation (includes data 1981–1997). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 1999 Jun. p. 1–5 (Section 1, Information from the facility profile questionnaire, 1997).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2008 Annual report – treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada, 1997 to 2006. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2008. p. 11 (Section 2, Renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutchinson TA. The price and challenges of extraordinary success: treating end-stage renal failure in the next millenium. CMAJ. 1999;160(11):1589–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Cancer Institute. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Estimated U.S. Cancer Prevalence [Internet]. Rockville, MD. 2010.
  11. 11.
    Allen D, Wainwright M, Hutchinson T. ‘Non-compliance’ as illness management: hemodialysis patients’ descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions. Soc Sci Med. In press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kearney M. Introduction. In: A place of healing: working with suffering in living and dying. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. XIX–XXII.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hutchinson TA, Hutchinson N, Arnaert A. Whole person care: encompassing the two faces of medicine. CMAJ. 2009;180(8):845–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rieff D. The way we live now. Miracle workers? [Internet]. New York Times. 17 Feb 2008.
  15. 15.
    Harrington A. Chapter 1, The power of suggestion. In: The cure within: a history of mind-body medicine. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company; c2008. p. 31–66.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robinson W. A misguided miracle: the use of placebos in clinical practice. Ethics Behav. 1998;8(1):93–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nerem RM, Levesque MJ, Cornhill JF. Social environment as a factor in diet-induced ­atherosclerosis. Science. 1980;208:1475–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D’Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(8):847–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Temel J, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:733–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Satir V, Banmen J, Gerber J, Gomori M. Chapter 7, The transformation process. In: The Satir Model. Family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behaviour Books; c1991. p. 147–73.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bliss M. Chapter 10, Sir William. In: William Osler: a life in medicine. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press; c1999. p. 369–401.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medical Professionalism Project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter. Lancet. 2002;359:520–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programs in Whole Person CareMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations