Epilogue: Decisions Under Uncertainty
The easily accessible fossil energy sources are drying up, pollution is creating ecological problems on a global scale, and the increasing costs of providing energy contribute to the growing instability of the global financial system. The very uneven distribution of wealth that has resulted on national and global scales is likely to create social tensions and breakdowns that are dangerous in a world of growing population and nuclear weapons. All technical and social actions that may avoid a Dark Age of battles for diminishing resources bear risks, whose assessments by individuals and nations differ substantially. The first decision to be taken under these uncertainties should concern the legal framework of the market and its adjustment to the challenges of a future ruled more clearly than ever by energy and entropy. This adjustment should stimulate energy conservation and emission mitigation. Furthermore, it should invigorate those sectors of the economy where humans cannot be easily pushed aside by energy-powered machines, and observe simultaneously that the production of material wealth rests on the conversion of nature’s gift of energy into physical work. Whether the appropriate instrument is a social-ecological tax reform that shifts the burden of taxes and levies from labor to energy according to the productive power of these factors is a question that voters and governments will have to decide. Their decisions may well depend on the general acceptance of old and seemingly trite rules of conduct that serve to promote a minimum level of equity for all.
KeywordsPhotovoltaic Module Roof Area Conventional Combustion Solar Thermal Power State Indebtedness
- 1.Hoddeson, L., Daitch, V.: True Genius. The Life and Science of John Bardeen. Joseph Henry Press, Washington (2002), p. 169Google Scholar
- 4.Birnbacher, D.: Intergenerationelle Verantwortung oder: Dürfen wir die Zukunft der Menschheit diskontieren? In: Klawitter, J., Kümmel, R. (eds.) Umweltschutz und Marktwirtschaft, pp. 101–115. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg (1989)Google Scholar
- 5.Tolba, M.K. (ed.): Our Fragile World—Vols. I and II of the Forerunner to the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. UNESCO and Eolss Publishers, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Grey, J., Hamdan, L.A., Faughanan, B., Maryniak, G. et al. (eds): Space Manufacturing, Vols. 1–10. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston (1975–1995)Google Scholar
- 7.Eichhorn, W., Solte, D.: Das Kartenhaus Weltfinanzsystem. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt (2009)Google Scholar
- 8.Pascal, B.: Pensées, No. 187. Translated by Wolfgang Rüttenauer, Deutsche Buch-Gemeinschaft, Berlin (1964); p. 83Google Scholar
- 9.Armingeon, K.: Energiepolitik in Europa: Hindernisse umweltpolitischer Reformen. In: Pfister, Ch. (ed.) Das 1950er Syndrom, pp. 377–389. Haupt, Bern (1995)Google Scholar
- 11.von Weizsäcker, U., Jesinghus, J.: Ecological Tax Reform: A Policy Proposal for Sustainable Development. Zed Books, London (1992)Google Scholar
- 12.Baron, R.: Competitive Issues Related to Carbon/Energy Taxation. Annex I Expert Group on the UN FCCC. Working paper 14. Paris, ECON-Energy (1997)Google Scholar
- 13.Kümmel, R.: Energie und Kreativität, pp. 94–110. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.BBC World Service Poll (2007): http://www.bbcworldservice.com; contact with the participating pollsters via: email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org.
- 15.Toynbee, A.J.: A Study of History—Abridgement of Vols. I-VI by D.C. Sommervell. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1946)Google Scholar