Skip to main content

Impact Damage of Composite Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Long-Term Durability of Polymeric Matrix Composites

Abstract

The damage tolerance of composite structures is intimately linked to the morphology and extent of flaws or damage. Impacts are a commonly occurring source of threat to composites that can produce a “seed” damage state which inherently controls the subsequent durability and damage tolerance of the affected structure. Transverse impact to composites is of particular concern due to the possibility of exciting damage modes that are difficult, or even not possible, to visually detect from the exterior (impact-side) surface. Some examples of such damage are delamination, backside-only fiber failure, debonding of internal substructure (e.g., stringers and stiffeners, doublers, joints), and crushing and separation of sandwich panel core. Impact damage is highly dependent upon the nature of the threat and conditions associated with the impact event. This chapter will provide an overview of impact damage threats that are common to composite aircraft structures and describe the relationship of these threat sources to the damage that is seeded. An historical overview of the impact damage tolerance methodologies developed by military aircraft programs, and subsequently widely adopted across the composite structures community, is also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrate, S, 1991, “Impact on Composite Materials,” Applied Mechanics Review, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 155–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Airoldi, A, Cacchione B, 2005, “Numerical Analysis of Bird Impact on Aircraft Structures Undergoing Large Deformations and Localized Failures,” Impact Loading of Lightweight Structures, M. Alves and N. Jones (Eds), WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst, Southampton SO40 7AA, UK, vol. 49, WIT Press, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anghileri, M, Castelletti, LML, and Mazza, V 2005, “Birdstrike: Approaches to the Analysis of Impacts with Penetration,” Impact Loading of Lightweight Structures, M. Alves and N. Jones (Eds), WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst, Southampton SO40 7AA, UK, vol. 49, pp. 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM International 1994, Standard Test Method for Hail Impact Resistance of Aerospace Transparent Enclosures, ASTM F320-94, ASTM Intl, West Conshohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aviation Safety Network 2010, ASN Aviation Safety Database 2001, viewed 20 January, 2010, <http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010402-1>.

  6. Barber, J.P., Taylor, H.R., Wilbeck, J.S.: Bird impact forces and pressures on rigid and compliant targets. Technical Report AFFDL-TR-77–60. University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH, USA (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bird Strike Committee USA 2010, Significant Bird Strikes, viewed 20 January 2010, <http://www.birdstrike.org/events/signif.htm>.

  8. Cairns, D, Lagace, PA 1989, “Transient Response of Graphite/Epoxy and Kevlar/Epoxy Laminates Subjected to Impact,” AIAA Journal, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1590–1596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantwell, WJ, Morton, J 1991, “The impact resistance of composite materials – a review” Composites, vol 22. no.5, pp. 347–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheverton, RD, Gejlen, PC, Haun, GT. Iskander, SK, 1980, “Application of Crack Arrest Theory to a Thermal Shock Experiment,” Crack Arrest Methondology and Applications, ASTM STP 711, pp. 392–421.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crosley, PB, Ripling, EJ, 1980, “Significance of Crack Arrest Toughness(Kla) Testing,” Crack Arrest Methodology and Applications, ASTM STP 711, pp 301–337.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson, GG, Labib, AW, 2003, “Learning from failures: design improvements using a multiple criteria decision-making process,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers; Part G; Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 217, no. 4, pp. 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies, GAO, Robinson, P, 1992, “Predicting Failure by Debonding/Delamination,” AGARD: 7th Structures and Materials Meeting, Debonding/Delamination of Composites.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davies, GAO, Zhang, X, Zhou, G, Watson, S, 1994, “Numerical Modeling of Impact Damage,” Composites, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 342–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies, GAO, Zhang, X 1995, “Impact Damage Prediction in Carbon Composite Structures,” Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dost, EF, Avery, WB, Ilcewicz, LB, Grande, DH, Coxon, BR 1992, “Impact Damage Resistance of Composite Fuselage Structure, Part 1,” FAA, Ninth DOD(NASA)FAA Conference on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, vol. 2, pp 1037–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dost, EF, Ilcewicz, LB, Avery, WB, Coxon, BR, 1991, “Effects of Stacking Sequence on Impact Damage Resistance and Residual Strength for Quasi-Isotropic Laminates,” Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture (3rd Volume), ASTM STP 1110, TK O’Brien, Ed. pp. 476–500.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Elber, W 1983. “Failure Mechanics in Low-Velocity Impacts on Thin Composite Plates,” NASA TP-2152.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farley, Richard D., “Numerical Modeling of Hailstorms and Hailstone Growth. Part II: The Role of Low-Density Riming Growth in Hail Production,” Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, Vol. 26, 1987, pp. 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Federal Aviation Administration 1992, Fuel Tank Access Covers, Advisory Circular 25. 963–1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Federal Aviation Administration 1999, Certification of Transport Aircraft Structure, Advisory Circular 25–21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Federal Aviation Administration 2007, Instructions for Continued Airworthiness of Structural Repairs on Transport Airplanes, Advisory Circular 25.1529-1A.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Federal Aviation Administration 2010, FAA Wildlife Strike Database, viewed 19 January 2010, <http://wildlife-mitigation.tc.faa.gov/wildlife>.

  24. Frings, G 1984. “A Study of Bird Ingestions Into Large High Bypass Ratio Turbine Aircraft Engines,” Federal Aviation Administration Final Report DOT/FAA/CT-84/13, September.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Garcia, F., and List, R., “Laboratory measurements and Parameterizations of Supercooled Water Skin Temperatures and Bulk Properties of Gyrating Hailstones,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 49, No. 22, 1992, pp. 2058–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gates, D 2008 ‘Bair pilots Boeing effort to replace best-selling 737’ The Seattle Times, 17 July, viewed 8 October 2009, retrieved from <http://seattletimes.nwsource.com>.

  27. Georgiadis, S, Gunnion, AJ, Thomson, RS & Cartwright, BK 2008, ‘Bird-strike simulation for certification of the Boeing 787 composite moveable trailing edge’, Composite Structures, vol. 86, no. 1–3, pp. 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goncalves, W, Olmi, F, Chaves, CE, and Feitoza, AP 2005, “High Velocity Impact Against Aeronautical Structures,” Impact Loading of Lightweight Structures, M. Alves and N. Jones (Eds), WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst, Southampton SO40 7AA, UK, vol. 49, pp. 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Halpin, JC 1980, “Practical Applications of Composite Materials,” UCLA Short Course Lecture Notes.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Halpin, JC and Kim, H 2007, ‘Managing Impact Risk for Composite Structures: Unifying Durability and Damage Tolerance Perspective’, presentation given at FAA/EASA/Industry Composite Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop, Amsterdam, 7–11 May.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Halpin, JC and Kim, H 2009, “Managing Damage Threats for Composite Structures: Unifying Durability and Damage Tolerance Perspective,” presentation given at 3rd FAA/EASA/Industry Composite Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop, Tokyo, 1–5 June.

    Google Scholar 

  32. International Air Transportation Association 2005, “Ground Damage Prevention Programme Targets 10% Cost Reduction,” Industry Times, Edition 7, September, Article 4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jackson, WC and Poe, CC, 1992, “The Use of Impact Force as a Scale Parameter for the Impact Response of Composite Laminates,” NASA Technical Memorandum 104189.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson, D. B., and Rasmussen, R. M., “Hail Growth Hysteresis,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 49, No. 24, 1992, pp. 2525–2532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kakarala, S, Roche, JL 1987, “Experimental Comparison of Several Impact Test Methods” Instrumented Impact Testing of Plastics and Composite Materials, ASTM STP 936, pp. 144–162.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kan, HP, 1998, “Enhanced Reliability Prediction Methodology for Impact Damaged Composite Structures,” FAA Final Report DOT/FAA/AR-97/79.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kan, HP, Cordero, R and Whitehead, RS, 1997, “Advanced Certification Methodology for Composite Structures,” FAA Final Report DOT/FAA/AR-96/111.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Karagiozova, D and Mines, RAW 2007, ‘Impact of aircraft rubber tyre fragments onto aluminum alloy plates: II – Numerical simulations using LS-DYNA’, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 647–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, H. and Kedward, K. T. 2000, “Modeling Hail Ice Impacts and Predicting Impact Damage Initiation in Composite Structures,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1278–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, H. and Keune, J. N. 2007, “Compressive Strength of Ice Measured at High Strain Rate,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 42, No. 8, 2007, pp. 2802–2806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim, H., Kedward, K.T., and Welch, D.A. 2003, “Experimental Investigation of High Velocity Ice Impacts on Woven Carbon/Epoxy Composite Panels,” Composites Part A, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2003, pp. 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim, H., Nightingale, J., and Park, H. 2007, “Impact Damage Resistance of Composite Panels Impacted by Cotton-Filled and Unfilled Ice,” Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Composite Materials, July 9–13, 2007, Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kwon, YS, Sankar, BV 1993, “Indentation-Flexure and Low-Velocity Impact Damage in Graphite Epoxy Laminates,” Journal of Composite Technology and Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 101–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, SM, Zahuta, P 1991, “Instrumented Impact and Static Indentation of Composites,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 204–222.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maikuma, H, Gillespie, JW Jr., Wilkins, DJ 1990, “Mode II Interlaminar Fracture of the Center Notch Flexural Specimen Under Impact Loading,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 24, no. 2, pp 124–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mao, RH, Meguid, SA, Ng, TY 2008, “Transient three dimensional finite element analysis of a bird striking a fan blade,” International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meyer, PI 1988, “Low-Velocity Hard-Object Impact of a Filament-Wound Kevlar/Epoxy Composite,” Composite Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 279–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Military Handbook Mil-Hdbk-17 Rev. F, 2002. Composite Materials Handbook, June 17, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mines, RAW, McKwon, S, and Birch, RS 2007, ‘Impact of aircraft rubber tyre fragments onto aluminum alloy plates: I – Experimental’, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Murthy, PLN, Chamis, CC 1986, “Dynamic Stress Analysis of Smooth and Notched Fiber Composite Flexural Specimens,” Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Seventh Conference), ASTM STP 893, pp 368–391.

    Google Scholar 

  51. National Research Council Canada 2010, “Highlights – It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane… It’s a Bird Striking a Plane,” Viewed 19 January 2010, <http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/news/nrc/2007/01/07/bird-plane.html>.

  52. Park, H., and Kim, H., “Damage Resistance Of Single Lap Adhesive Composite Joints By Transverse Ice Impact” International Journal of Impact Engineering, in press – submitted Aug. 10, 2008, accepted Aug. 17, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Petrenko, V. F., and Whitworth, R. W., Physics of Ice, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Poe, CC, Jr. 1988, "Simulated Impact Damage in a Thick Graphite/Epoxy Laminate Using Spherical Indenters,” NASA TM-100539.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Poe, CC, Jr., 1992, “Impact Damage and Residual Tension Strength of a Thick Graphite/Epoxy Rocket Motor Case,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 394–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sala, G, 2000, “Composite Degradation Due to Fluid Absorption,” Composites Part B, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Saul, M., Lunford, J.L., “Damage From Hail Grounds Nearly 100 D/FW Planes Passengers Scramble as Scores of Flights Cancelled,” Dallas Morning News, May 1, 1995, pp. 1A.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schoeppner, GA, Abrate, S 2000, “Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates,” Composites: Part A, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 903–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shafizadeh, JE, Seferis, JC, Chesmar, EF, and Geyer, R, 1999, “Evaluation of the In-Service Performance Behavior of Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Structures,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 661–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Shivakumar, KN, Elber, W, Illg, W 1985. “Prediction of Impact Force and Duration Due to Low-Velocity Impact on Circular Composite Laminates” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 674–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sjoblom, P 1987, “Simple Design Approach Against Low-Velocity Impact Damage” 32nd International SAMPE Symposium, April 6–9, pp. 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sjoblom, PO, Hartness, TJ, Cordell, TM 1988. “On Low-Velocity Impact Testing of Composite Materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 22, no. 30, pp. 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tan, TM, Sun, CT 1985, “Use of Statical Indentation Laws in the Impact Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wardle, BL, Lagace, PA 1997, “On the Use of Dent Depth as an Impact Damage Metric for Thin Composite Structures,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1093–1110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wardle, BL, Lagace, PA 1998, “On the Use of Quasi-Static Testing to Assess Impact Damage Resistance of Composite Shell Structures,” Mech. Of Advanced Materials and Structures, vol. 5, no. 1, pp 103–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wilbeck, J.S., Rand, J.L.: The development of a substitute bird model. ASME Paper ASME 81-GT-23, Gas turbine conference and products show, Houston, TX, USA (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wilbeck, J.S.: Impact behavior of low strength projectiles. Report No. AFML-TR-77-134, Air Force Materials Lab., Air Force Wright Aeronautical Lab’s, Wright-Patterson Air Force base, OH (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wu, E, Shyu, K 1993, “Response of Composite Laminates to Contact Loads and Relationship to Low-Velocity Impact,” Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 1443–1464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Souter, RK and Emerson, JB, 1952, “Summary of Available Hail Literature and the Effect of Hail on Aircraft in Flight,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Technical Note, NACA TN 2734, September.

    Google Scholar 

  70. McNaughton, II and Chisman SW, 1969, “A Study of Hail Impact at High Speed on Light Alloy Plates,” Proc. 9th Annual National Conference on Environmental Effects on Aircraft and Propulsion Systems, Nav. Air Propulsion Test Center, pp. 16–1 to 16–7.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Thomson, RG and Hayduk, RJ, 1971, “An Improved Analytical Treatment of the Denting of Thin Sheets by Hail,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Note, NASA TN D-6102, January.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Transport Canada 2004, “Sharing the Skies, An Aviation Industry Guide to the Management of Wildlife Hazards, 2nd Ed,” Transport Canada Publication TP13549E.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Transport Canada 2010, “Airport Wildlife Management Bulletin No. 33,”.

    Google Scholar 

  74. US Air Force 2010, Air Force Safety Center BASH, viewed 19 January 2010, <http://www.afsc.af.mil/organizations/bash>.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyonny Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, H., Halpin, J.C., DeFrancisci, G.K. (2012). Impact Damage of Composite Structures. In: Pochiraju, K., Tandon, G., Schoeppner, G. (eds) Long-Term Durability of Polymeric Matrix Composites. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9308-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics