Advertisement

Multiple-site Damage Location Using Single-site Training Data

  • R. J. Barthorpe
  • K. Worden
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The identification of multiple-site damage is a challenging problem in data-based structural health monitoring (SHM). It is generally accepted that higher level damage identification via statistical pattern recognition requires the adoption of a supervised learning approach, with the need for data to be gathered from the structure in all damaged states of interest. The number of states for which data would be required to cover all damage combinations grows exponentially with the number of locations at which damage may occur. Damage state data sets of this extent are unlikely to be available in practical applications. The objective of this paper is to explore an interesting approach to the problem of multiple-site damage location. It is postulated that if sufficient information can be gleaned from single-site damage data to allow identification of multiplesite damage, then the requirement to gather data for all combinations of damage location may be circumvented. In the present study this possibility is assessed using data from an experimental structure. The experimental structure used is a full-scale, laboratory-based aircraft wing section. Damage sensitive features identified using single-site data are shown to perform well when applied to the multiple-site location problem.

Keywords

Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Damage State Structural Health Monitoring Damage Identification Statistical Pattern Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rytter A. Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures [PhD Dissertation]: Aalborg University, Denmark; 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruotolo R, Surace C. Damage assessment of multiple cracked beams: Numerical results and experimental validation. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1997;206(4):567-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin R-J, Cheng F-P. Multiple crack identification of a free-free beam with uniform material property variation and varied noised frequency. Engineering Structures. 2008;30(4):909-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Contursi T, Messina A, Williams EJ. A multiple-damage location assurance criterion based on natural frequency changes. Journal of Vibration and Control. 1998;4(5):619-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Worden K, Manson G, Fieller NRJ. Damage detection using outlier analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2000 Jan;229(3):647-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Worden K, Manson G, Allman D. Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part I. Novelty detection on a laboratory structure. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2003 Jan;259(2):323-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2006;27(8):861-74.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The Meaning and Use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (Roc) Curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Barthorpe
    • 1
  • K. Worden
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations