Advertisement

Biodiversity pp 349-354 | Cite as

Genetic Diversity of Two Native Forest Tree Species in Turkey: Pinus brutia Ten. and Cupressus sempervirens L.

  • Nuray Kaya
  • Kani Işik

Abstract

Pinus brutia Ten. and , Cupressus sempervirens L. are important forest tree species in Turkey for various economic and ecological reasons. P. brutia occupies 3.1 million ha. of forest land, which constitutes 36% of the forest areas in the country1. It grows from sea level up to 1500 meters on the Taurus Mountains2,3. This species is one of the most important forest trees in the region, providing both timber resources and amenity in Turkey; and it is preferable for afforestation of dry and degraded areas in the Mediterranean region and elsewhere, due to its wide tolerance range and drought resistance4,5. C. sempervirens L. also grows in several countries with Mediterranean climate6,7. It makes largest natural stands in Koprulu Kanyon National Park in Antalya, Turkey; making occasional mixed stands with P. brutia.

Keywords

Total Genetic Variation Forest Tree Species Population Genetic Variation Locus Locus Isoenzyme Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anonymous, 1980, Türkiye Orman Envanteri, Orman Bakanitği, Orman Genet Müdürlüğü, Yayin No:13, Seri No: 630.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Critchfieldt, W. B., Little, E. L. Jr., 1966, Geographic distribution of the Pinus of the world, USDA Forest Service, Micellaneous Pub. 991, pp. 97.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Selik, 1958, , İst. Univ. Orm. Fab. Derg.8a, 161–98.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oppenheimer, H. R., 1967, Mechanisims of Drought resistance in conifers of the Mediterrenean zone and the arid west of the USA. Part 1. Physiological and Anotomical Investigation. Final Report on Project No:A 10-Fs 7, Grant No: FG-Is 119, submitted to Israel, pp. 73.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palmberg, C., 1976, Silvae Genetica, 24 (5–6), 150–60.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emberger, L., Gaussen, H., Kassas, A., De Philipis, A., 1963, Bioclimatic map of the Mediterranean zone. Arid zone Research, UNESCO-FAO, Paris, pp.58.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papageorgiou, A. C., Anetsos, P. K., Hattemer, H. H., 1994, , Forest Genetics, 1,1–11.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Isik, K., Kara, N., 1997, , Silvae Genetica, 46 (2–3), 113–20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Korol, L., Kara, N., Isik, K., Schiller, G., 1997, , Silvae Genetica, 46 (2–3), 151–5.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isik, K., 1986, Silvae Genetica, 35, 58–65.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feret, P.P., Bergmann, F., 1976, Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins and Enzymes. In Modern Methods in Forest Genetics Miksche, J.P. (Ed), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 49–77.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adams, W.T., 1993, Application of isozymes in tree breeding. In Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Tanksley, S.D., Orton, T. J. (Eds), Part A. 1993, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Amsterdam, pp. 381–400.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conkle, M.T., Hodgskiss, P.D., Nunnally, L.B., Hunter, S.C., 1982, Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Conifer Seeds: A Laboratory Manual, U.S.D.A. Gen. Techn. Rept. PSW- 64, p.18.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kara, N., Korol, L.. Istk. K., Schiller, G.. 1997, Silvae Genetica, 46 (2–3), 155–61.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Swofford, L. D., Selander, B. R., 1981, BIOSYS-1, A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in genetics. User manual. Dept. of Genetics and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Il, USA.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nicolic, D., Tucic, N., 1983, , Silvae Genetica, 32(3–4), 80–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Isik, K., Topak, M., Keskin, C., 1987, Kizilçamda (Pinus brutia Ten.) orijin denemeleri. Alti farkli populasyonun beş ayri deneme alaninda ilk alti yildaki büyüme özellikleri. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Orman Ağaçlari ve Tohumlan islah Enstitüsü Yayin No.3, p. 139.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scaltsoyiannes, A., Rohr, R., Panetso, K.P., Tsaktsira, M., 1994 Silvae Genetica, 43, 20–30.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamrick, J.L., 1989, Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. In , Isozymes in Plant Biology (Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., eds.), Chapman and Hall., London, pp. 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nevo, E., 1978, Theor. Pop. Biol., 13, 129–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hamrick, J.L., Milton, J.B., Linhart, Y.B., 1981, Levels of genetic variation in trees: Influence of life history characteristics. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the isozymes of North American Forest Trees and insects (Conkle, M.T., ed.), U.S.D.A. Gen. Techn. Rept. PSW-48, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuray Kaya
    • 1
  • Kani Işik
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of BiologyAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations