The Me and the Not-Me

Positive and Negative Poles of Identity
  • George J. McCall
Chapter

Abstract

Symbolic interactionists have long regarded identification of Self and Other as a key feature of social interaction (Blumer, 1962; Cooley, 1902; McCall & Simmons, 1978/1966; Mead, 1934). Establishment of one’s own identity to oneself is as important in interaction as to establis it for the other. One’s own identity in a situation is not absolutely given but is more or less problematic. (Foote, 1951, p. 18) For just such reasons, symbolic interactionists have similarly considered identity to be a key feature of the self. As Kuhn put it, “a person interiorizes his roles and statuses, and with these the expectations that significant others have of him” (Hickman & Kuhn, 1956, p. 242). Adding to this foundation a Cooley-esque emphasis on imagination, (1978/1966) proposed that “a role-identity is his imaginative view of himself as he likes to think of himself being and acting as an occupant” of a particular social position. These components remain central to the concept today, as (2001) stated that “identities are internalized role expectations” (p. 286) and that “self-meanings develop in the context of meanings of roles and counter roles” (p. 287).

Keywords

Posit Prefix Clarification Weinstein Malleability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, C. N., & Wiley, M.G.(1981). Situated activity and identity formation. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.). Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 269–289). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, H. (1962). Society as symbolic interaction. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 179–192). Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumstein, P. W. (1975). Identity-bargaining and self-conception. Social Forces, 53, 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, P.J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from a symbolic interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. -(1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review. 56, 836–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D.C. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M.L. (1990). Interpersonal accounting. In H. Giles & P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 227–255). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Collier, G., Kuiken, D., & Enzle, M.E. (1982). The role of grammatical qualification in the expression and perception of emotion Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 11, 631–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  13. Ebaugh, H.R. F. (1988). Becoming an ex: The process of role exit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fein, M. L. (1990). Role change: A resocialization perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, J. St B. T. (1972). Reasoning with negatives. British Journal of Psychology. 63, 213–219.Google Scholar
  17. Foote, N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review. 16, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fries, C. C. (1952). The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  19. Freitas, A., Kaiser, S., Chandler, J., Hall, C., Kirn, J., & Hammidi, T. (1997). Appearance management as border construction: Least favorite clothing, group distancing, and identity …not! Sociological Inquiry. 67, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gecas, V., & Burke, P. J. (1995). Self and identity. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 41–67). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry. 18, 213–231.Google Scholar
  22. -. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology. 62, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. -. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  24. -. (1961a). Asylums. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  25. -. (1961b). Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-MerrillGoogle Scholar
  26. -. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  27. -. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  28. -. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gordon, C. (1968). Self-conceptions: Configurations of content. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction. Vol. I (pp. 115–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. -. (1969). Self-conceptions methodologies. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 148, 328–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross, E., & Stone, G.P. (1964). Embarassment and the organization of role requirements. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hickman, C. A., & Kuhn, M.H. (1956). Individuals, groups, and economic behavior. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  34. Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes, E. C. (1958). Men and their work. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  36. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Volume I (pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Kuhn, M. H. (1960). Self-attitudes by sex and professional training. Sociological Quarterly, 1, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T.S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuiken, D. (198I). Non-immediate language style and inconsistency between private and expressed evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 183–196.Google Scholar
  41. MacKinnon, N.J. (1994). Symbolic interaction ism as affect control. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCall, G. J. (1979, April). The functions of deviant identities in the formation of role-identity. Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  44. McCall, G.J., & Simmons, J.L. (1978/1966). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. -. (1982). Social psychology: A sociological approach. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mead, O. H. (1934). Mind. self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mosier, C. I. (1941). A psychometric study of meaning. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ogilvie, D. M. (1987). The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Owens, T.J. (1993). Accentuate the positive-and the negative: Rethinking the use of self-esteem, self-deprecation, and self-confidence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oyserrnan, D., & Markus, H. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paulhus, D. L., & Levitt, K. (1987). Desirable responding triggered by affect: Automatic egotism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Preston, J.M. (1984). Referential communication: Some factors intluencing communication efficiency. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 16, 196–207.Google Scholar
  53. Prus, R. C. (1975). Resisting designations: An extension of attribution theory into a negotiated context. Sociological Inquiry, 45, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rambo, L. R. (1995). Understanding religious conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rentsch. J. R., & Heffner, T.S. (1994). Assessing self-concept: Analysis of Gordon’s coding scheme using “Who Am I” responses. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 283–300.Google Scholar
  56. Rhodewatt, F.T. (1986). Self-presentation and the phenomenal self: On the stability and malleability of self-conceptions. In R. E Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 117–142). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  57. Robinson, D., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1992). Selective interaction as a strategy for identity maintenance: An affect control model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers. J.W., & Buffalo, M.D. (1974). Fighting back: Nine modes of adaptation to a deviant label. Social Problems, 22, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scheff, T. J. (1995). Socialization of emotions: Pride and shame as causal agents. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 281–304). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  61. Scott, R. A. (1979). The making of blind men: A study of adult socialization. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  62. Smith-Levin, L. (1990). Emotion as confirmation and disconfirmation of identity: An affect control model. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 238–270). New York: SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Spitzer, S., Couch, C., & Stratton, J. (1971). The assessment of self. Iowa City, IA: Semoll.Google Scholar
  64. Stone, G. P. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 86–118). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  65. Strauss, A. L. (1959). Mirrors and masks: The search for identity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  66. Stryker, S. (1962). Conditions of accurate role-taking: A test of Mead’s theory. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 41–62). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  67. -. (1980). Symbolic interaction ism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  68. Stryker, S., & Burke, PJ. (2001). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  70. Swarm, W. B., Jr., Pelham, B.w., & Krull, D.S. (1989). Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 782–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Swarm, W. B., Jr., & Read, S.J. (1981). Acquiring self-knowledge: The search for feedback that fits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1119–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tedeschi, J. T. (Ed.). (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tracy, K. (1990). The many faces of facework. In H. Giles & P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 209–226). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Travisano, R. V. (1970). Altemation and conversion as qualitatively differenttransformations. In G. P. Stone & H. A. Farberman (Eds.), Social psychology through symbolic interaction (pp. 594–606). NewYork: Wiley.Google Scholar
  75. Tucker, C. (1966). Some methodological problems of Kuhn’s self theory. Sociological Quarterly, 7, 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tumer, R. H. (1962). Role-taking: Process versus conformity. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20–40). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  77. -. (1968). The self-conception in social interaction. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction. Vol. I (pp. 93–106). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Turner, R. H., & Schutte, J. (1981). The true self method for studying the self conception. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weinstein, E., & Deutschberger, P. (1964). Tasks, bargains, and identities in social interaction. Social Forces, 42, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wright, D. E. (1999). Personal relationships. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  81. Yardley, K. (1987). What do you mean “Who Am I?”: Exploringthe implications of a self-conceptmeasurement with subjects. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives (pp. 211–230). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • George J. McCall
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Missouri-St. LouisSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations