Skip to main content

Abstract

Several Congresses have passed various forms of minimum tax, both at the individual and corporate level. They have even passed alternative minimum tax bills to squeeze out additional tax revenue that would not otherwise be forthcoming. The problem was caused by the philosophy of taxation they have adopted over the years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

NOTES

  1. Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program (1875). The original wording was “Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen.” Louis Blanc, the French socialist, said basically the same thing in 1848. George Seldes, The Great Thoughts 274 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I owe this example to Murray N. Rothbard but I can’t remember quite where I read it.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walter J. Blum and Harry Kalven, Jr., The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation (1953); F.A. Hayek, The Case Against Progressive Income Taxes, Freeman 229-232 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Some would say that utilitarianism is a kind of moral philosophy. If it is, it is defective, for at least two reasons. its premise is based on the greatest good for the greatest number. It incorporates positive-game theory. One problem with the utilitarian approach is that it is not possible to measure gains and losses accurately enough to determine whether the gains exceed the losses. Another problem — one might call it a fatal flaw — is that utilitarianism completely ignores property rights. For more on this point, see Robert W. McGee, The Fatal Flaw in the Methodology of Law & Economics, Commentaries on Law & Economics 1: 209–223 (1997); Robert W. McGee, The Fatal Flaw in NAFTA, GATT and All Other Trade Agreements, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 14: 549-565 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States v. Helmsley, 941 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1991). Interestingly enough, she actually received a refund because she paid too much tax. The reason she went to jail was because she submitted a fraudulent tax return.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGee, R.W. (2004). The Case for a Maximum Tax. In: The Philosophy of Taxation and Public Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9140-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9140-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9139-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9140-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics