Summary and Conclusion

  • Benjamin Gidron
  • Michal Bar
  • Hagai Katz
Part of the Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies book series (NCSS)

Abstract

The Israeli public’s renewed interest in the third sector is reflected in a headline article about two accomplished generals who retired from the Israeli Defense Forces and decided to forego politics in favor of public activity:

They are both charismatic people who are convinced their public duty is not done yet. Both resolved not to join the political system as civilians after leaving the army. These are two people who could have filled a frontline position in the political arena: one was offered the position of Secretary of Defense and the other a senior position in one of the political parties. Their reasons for not joining the political system were identical: in the present situation they feel they can contribute much more to society outside the political arena. They want to meet people, to join non-political movements, to speak and listen, learn and contribute. They believe this is not done in the Knesset nor in the party headquarters... nowadays nongovernmental organizations address nearly every public issue from Jewish-Arab relations to a new secular-religious “treaty.” All the issues that have never been mentioned in the election campaigns, all the gaps and rifts that are really important to our life here and no prime minister has addressed in the past twenty years, all these are discussed by and within the civil society arena (Shelach, 2001).

Keywords

Expense Arena Burial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akzin, B. (1955). The Role of Parties in Israeli Democracy. Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  2. Arian, A. (1972). The Elections in Israel, 1969. Jerusalem: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Eliezer, A. (1999). “Is a Civil Society Taking Shape in Israel? Politics and the Identity of the New Associations.” Israeli Sociology (1), 51–97 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  4. Doron, A. and R. M. Kramer (1992). The Israeli Welfare State. Tel-Aviv: Am-Oved (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  5. Elazar, D. (1986). Israel: Building a New Society, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foley, M. W and B. Edwards (1996). “The Paradox of Civil Society,” Journal of Democracy 7(3), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galnoor, I. (1982). “The Israeli Democracy and Social Participation,” Molad, 41, 71–87 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  9. Hansmann, H. (1987). “Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations”, in W W Powell (Ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press, 27–42.Google Scholar
  10. James, E. (1987). “The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective,” in W W Powell (Ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press, 397–415.Google Scholar
  11. Kramer, R. (1976). The Voluntary Service Agency in Israel. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  12. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots Associations. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Salamon, L. and H. K. Anheier (1998). “Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally,” Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Yishai, Y. (1987). Interest Groups in Israel, Tel Aviv, Am Oved (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  18. Yishai, Y. (1990). “State and Welfare Groups: Competition or Cooperation? Some Observations on the Israeli Scene,” Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(3), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yishai, Y. (1998). Civil Society in Israel towards the 21st Century —Between Society and State. Jerusalem: Paul Baerwald School of Social Work, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  20. Yishai, Y. (1999). “Democracy for the People? Determining Welfare Policy in Israel.” Bitachon Sociali, 56, 126–137 (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Gidron
    • 1
  • Michal Bar
    • 2
  • Hagai Katz
    • 3
  1. 1.Ben Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations