Advertisement

Linking Assessment and Diagnosis to Intervention for Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities

Chapter
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 25)

Abstract

Jeremy stood up, walked, and talked at exceptionally young ages, and he showed a natural ability in math. His curiosity and oral communication made him stand out among age peers, and the adults in his life considered him gifted. Yet, after completing first grade and despite a strong preschool program, Jeremy was having difficulty learning to read. His self-esteem was suffering as he encountered trouble learning for the first time in his life.

Keywords

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Achievement Test Learn Disability Cognitive Profile Processing Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, J. M., & Starnes, W. T. (1989). Identifying distinguishing characteristics of gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 12(1), 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for the gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, S. (1994). Meeting the needs of gifted/learning disabled students. Journal of Gifted Secondary Education, 5(3), 6–16.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, S., Owen, S. V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From identification to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bos, C. S., Nahmias, M. L., & Urban, M. A. (1999). Targeting home-school collaboration for students with ADHD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(5), 4–11.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, L. E., & Mills. C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 282–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniels, P. R. (1983). Teaching the gifted/learning disabled child. Rockville MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  8. Durden, W. G., & Tangherlini, A. E. (1993). Smart kids: How academic talents are developed and nurtured in America. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, D. Y. (2003). Equity and excellence: Culturally diverse students in gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 506–520). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Fox, L. H., Brody, L., & Tobin, D., (1983). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and Programming. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  11. Fox, L. H., Tobin, D., & Schiffman, G. B. (1983). Adaptive methods and techniques for learning disabled/gifted children. In L.H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 183–193). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  12. French, J. N. (1982). The gifted learning disabled child: A challenge and some suggestions. Roeper Review, 4(3), 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Larsen, L. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16 (2), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kames, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1991). Gifted handicapped. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd edition, pp. 428–437).Google Scholar
  16. Kaufmann, F., Kalbfleisch, M. L., & Castellanos, F. X. (2000). Attention Deficit Disorders and gifted students: What do we really know? (RM00146). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  17. Kavale, K. A. (1980). Learning disability and cultural disadvantage: The case for a relationship. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kay, K. (2002). Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of the twice exceptional student. Gilsum, NH: Avocus.Google Scholar
  19. Krippner, S. (1968). Etiological factors in reading disability of the academically talented in comparison to pupils of average and slow-learning ability. Journal of Educational Research, 61(6), 275–279.Google Scholar
  20. Levine, M. (2002). The myth of laziness. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Lyon, G. R. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities: A position in search of logic and data. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 504–506, 512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mastropieri, M. A., Sweda, J., & Scruggs, T. E. (2000). Teacher use of mnemonic strategy instruction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(2), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McEachern, A. G., & Bornot, J. (2001). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Implications and strategies for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 5(1), 34–41.Google Scholar
  24. Mendaglio, S. (1993). Counseling gifted learning disabled: Individual and group counseling techniques. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 131–149). Denver: Love.Google Scholar
  25. Mills, C. J., & Brody, L. E. (1999). Overlooked and unchallenged: Gifted students with learning disabilities. Knowledge Quest, 27(5), 30–34.Google Scholar
  26. Moller, B. W. (1984). Special techniques for the gifted LD student. Academic Therapy, 20, 167–171.Google Scholar
  27. Neihart, M. (2000). Gifted children with Asperger’s syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olson, R. K. (1985). Disabled reading processes and cognitive profiles. In D. B. Gray & J. F. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 215–244). Parkton MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  29. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 219–228). Boston: Allyn & Bacon).Google Scholar
  30. Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, M. C., Zetlin, A. G., & Wang, M. C. (1993). 20/20 analysis: Taking a close look at the margins. Exceptional Children, 59, 294–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers, K. B. (1992). A best-evidence synthesis of research on acceleration options for gifted students. In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline, & D. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (pp. 406–409). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schiff, M. M., Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for learning disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 400–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegel, L. S. (2003). IQ-discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 2–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Siegel, L. S., & Metsala, J. (1992). An alternative to the food processor approach to subtypes of learning disabilities. In N. N. Singh & I. L. Beale (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 44–60). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Silverman, L. K. (1989). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silverman, L. K. (2002). Upside down brilliance: The visual-spatial learner. Denver: DeLeon.Google Scholar
  39. Southern, W. T. & Jones, E. D. (Eds.) (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stage, S. A., Abbott, R. D., Jenkins, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 24–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanley, J. C. (1979). The study and facilitation of talent in mathematics. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (The 79 yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 169–185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87–131). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stanovich, K. E. (1993). A model for studies of reading disability. Developmental Review, 13, 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Giftedness according to the theory of successful intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 113–123). Boston: Allyn & Bacon).Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, S. (1997). The source for nonverbal learning disorders. East Moline, IL: Linquisystems.Google Scholar
  46. Tobin, D., & Schiffman, G. B. (1983). Computer technology for learning disabled/gifted students. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning disabled/gifted children: identification and programming (pp. 195–206). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  47. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd. ed.). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  48. Torrance, E. P. (1979). Unique needs of the creative child and adult. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (The 79th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 352–371). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. U. S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Education Publications Center.Google Scholar
  50. Waldron, K. A., & Saphire, D. G. (1990). An analysis of WISC-R factors for gifted students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 491–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weinfeld, R., Barnes-Robinson, L., Jeweler, S., & Shevitz, B. (2002). Academic programs for gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 24(4), 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winebrenner, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching twice exceptional children. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(2), 3–6.Google Scholar
  53. Winebrenner, S., & Espeland, P. (1996). Teaching kids with learning difficulties in the regular classroom: Strategies and techniques every teacher can use to challenge and motivate struggling students. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johns Hopkins UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations