The Identification of Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities: Challenges, Controversies, and Promising Practices

Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 25)


What does a gifted student with learning disabilities look like? How can school psychologists and teachers recognize gifted students with learning disabilities? Consider the case of Ronald, a fourth grade boy with a 145 IQ. In kindergarten, before students are expected to read, Ronald was at the top of his class. Teachers raved about Ronald’s verbal skills and his clever responses in class. He was inquisitive and he loved books. He had memorized several of his favorite picture books, and could “read” them verbatim to the delight of his family and friends. In first grade, Ronald struggled with phonics, but had a fairly large sight-word vocabulary for a student his age. He was in the top reading group. By second grade, Ronald had slipped into the middle reading group, and he no longer seemed to enjoy books and reading. By fourth grade, Ronald was a very average-looking student. Ronald seemed to daydream in class. Teachers began to notice that Ronald had some difficulty reading textbooks in the content areas. Ronald’s mother reported that at home, Ronald was inquisitive and curious, that he enjoyed building models and playing with Legos. However, Ronald’s teachers only rarely saw such a spark in school. Occasionally, he would contribute something clever to the classroom discussion, but mostly he seemed disengaged.


Academic Achievement Learning Disability Learn Disability Gifted Student Specific Learning Disability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A. (1997). The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, S. M., Owen, S. V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beitchman, J. H., & Young, A. R. (1997). Learning disorders with a special emphasis on reading disorders: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1020–1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Profile analysis with the Wechsler Scales: Why does it persist? School Psychology International, 19, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 282–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Columbus Group (1991, July). Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, G. B., & Rimm, S. B. (1994). Education of the gifted and talented, (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Fox, L. H., & Brody, L. (1983). Models for identifying giftedness: Issues related to the learning disabled child. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming (pp. 101–116). Baltimore, MD: University Park.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  13. Gagné, F. (1997). Critique of Morelock’s (1996) definition of giftedness and talent. Roeper Review, 20, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., & Keiser, S. (1999). The LD label for relative functioning students: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunderson, C. W., Maesch, C., & Rees, J. W. (1987). The gifted learning disabled student. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, A. R. (1992). Commentary: Vehicles of g. Psychological Science, 3, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don’t say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., Allsop, D. H., & Mercer, A. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education agencies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morelock, M. J. (1996). On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing order on chaos. Roeper Review, 19, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naglieri, J. A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (2002). The Learning Disabilities Roundtable.Google Scholar
  23. Patchett, R. F., & Stansfield, M. (1992). Subtest scatter on the WISC-R with children of superior intelligence. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 5–11.Google Scholar
  24. Pritchard, D. A., Livingston, R. B., Reynolds, C., & Moses, J. A. (2000). Modal profiles for the WISC-III. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 400–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reis, S. M. (1989). Reflections on policy affecting the education of gifted and talented student. American Psychologist, 44, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1997). Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463–479.Google Scholar
  28. Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.Google Scholar
  29. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
  30. Riccio, C. A., & Hynd, G. W. (2000). Measurable biological substrates to verbal-performance differences in Wechsler scores. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosner, S. L., & Seymour, J. (1983). The gifted child with a learning disability: Clinical evidence. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin (Eds.), Learning disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming. (pp. 77–97). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schinka, J. A., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Curtiss, G. (1997). WISC-III subtest scatter as a function of the highest subtest score. Psychological Assessment, 9, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegle, D. (2000, December). Parenting achievement oriented children. Parenting for High Potential, pp. 6–7, 29-30.Google Scholar
  34. Silver, A. A., & Hagin, R. A. (2002). Disorders of learning in childhood (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Stanton, H. C., & Reynolds, C. (2000). Configurai frequency analysis as a method of determining wechsler profile types. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 434–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking Penguin, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Tannenbaum, A. J., & Baldwin, L. J. (1983). Giftedness and learning disability: A paradoxical combination. In L. H. Fox, L. Brody, & D. Tobin. (Eds.), Learning disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming. (pp. 11–36). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  38. Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. I. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Truscott, S. D., Narrett, C. M., & Smith, S. E. (1993). WISC-R subtest reliability over time: Implications for practice and research. Psychological Reports, 74, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. United States Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education for handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 62082–62085. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  41. United States Office of Education. (1976). Proposed rulemaking. Federal Register, 41, 52404–52407. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  43. Waldron, K. A., & Saphire, D. G. (1990). An analysis of factors for gifted students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 491–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watkins, M. W. (2000). Cognitive profile analysis: A shared professional myth. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1994). Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way?” School Psychology Review, 23, 640–651.Google Scholar
  46. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  47. Winner, E. (2000). Giftedness: Current theory and research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ConnecticutUSA

Personalised recommendations