Advertisement

Adjudicated Females’ Participation in Violence from Adolescence to Adulthood

Results from a Longitudinal Study
  • Nadine LanctÔt
  • Catherine Émond
  • Marc Le Blanc
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 19)

Abstract

In their recent review of the literature, (1998) note that the criminological study of delinquent behavior has focused primarily on between-group differences. As a result, the etiological study of delinquency from an individual perspective has been neglected. This observation is particularly true when examining the evolution of delinquents and vio-lent activities among adolescent females (Pajer, 1998; Wangby, Bergman, & Magnusson, 1999). It is an accepted fact in the literature that females commit less serious offences when compared with male counterparts (Chesney-Lind & Shelden, 1998). This gender difference is observed in official statistics as well as in self-reported surveys. Females are also less likely to continue engaging in delinquent behaviors as they move into late adolescence/early adulthood (Pajer, 1998; Lanctôt & Le Blanc, 2002). However, the gender gap in prevalence and persistence rates is smaller for deviant activities such as drug use (Pajer, 1998; Lanctôt & Le Blanc, 2002).

Keywords

Young Adulthood Adolescent Female Violent Behavior Delinquent Behavior Relational Aggression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ageton, S. S. (1983). The dynamics of female delinquency, 1976–1980. Criminology, 21, 1976–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayers, C. D., Williams, H., Hawkins, J. D., Peterson, P. L., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (1999). Assessing correlates of onset, escalation, and desistance of delinquent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (1998). Girls delinquency and juvenile justice. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company: Pacific Grove, California.Google Scholar
  5. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunford, F. W., & Elliott, D. S. (1984). Identifying career offenders using self-reported data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21(1), 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lanctôt, N., & Le Blanc, M. (1999). Les trajectoires marginales chez les adolescentes judicia-risées: Continuité et changement. Revue internationale de criminologie et de police scientifique, 52(1), 31–54.Google Scholar
  8. Lanctôt, N. & Le Blanc, M. (2002). Explaining adolescent females’ involvement in deviance. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, 29, 113:202.Google Scholar
  9. Le Blanc, M. (1996). MASPAQ: Mesures de l’adaptation sociale et personnelle pour les adolescents québécois: Manuel et guide d’utilisation. (3rd éd. ). Montréal: Groupe de recherche sur les adolescents en difficulté, École de psychoéducation, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  10. Le Blanc, M., & Loeber, R. (1998). Developmental criminology upgraded. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, 23, 115–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Le Blanc, M., Dionne, J., Proulx, J., Grégoire, J., & Trudeau-Le Blanc, P. (1998). Inter-venir autrement: Le modèle différentiel et les adolescents en difficulté. Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  12. Loeber, R., Wung, P., Keenan, K., Giroux, B., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Maughan, B. (1993). Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 101–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maughan, B., Pickles, A., Rowe, R., Costello E. J., & Angold, A. (2000). Developmental trajec-tories of aggressive and non-aggressive conduct problems. Journal of Quantitative Ctrajec-tories, 16, 199:221.Google Scholar
  14. Nottelman, E. D., & Jensen, P. S. (1995). Comorbidity of disorders in children and adolescents: Developmental perspectives. In T. H. Ollendick & R. J. Prinz (Eds. ), Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 109–155.Google Scholar
  15. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points trough life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thornberry, T. P., Huizinga, D., & Loeber, R. (1995). The prevention of serious delinquency and violence: Implications from the Program of Research on the Causes and Correlates of Delinquency. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, D. J. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds. ), Serious, violent, & chronic juvenile offenders (pp 213–237). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Pajer, K. A. (1998). What happens to bad girls? A review of adult outcomes of antisocial adolescent girls. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 862–870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wangby, M., Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1999). Development of adjustment problems in girls: What syndromes emerge? Child development, 70, 678–699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine LanctÔt
    • 1
  • Catherine Émond
    • 1
  • Marc Le Blanc
    • 1
  1. 1.School of CriminologyUniversity of MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations