Prediction and Prevention of Peer Victimization in Early Elementary School
While all children engage in physical aggression (e.g., pushing and hitting) and relational aggression (e.g., spreading rumors and social exclusion), past research suggests that the former is more prevalent among boys, and the latter is typically more frequent among girls (Björkqvist, Lagerspetz, & Kuakiainen, 1992; Cairns, Cairns, Neckerman, Ferguson, & Gariepy, 1989; Crick, 1997; Crick & Grotpeter,1995; Lagerspetz, Bjorkqvist, & Peltonen, 1988; Owens, 1996; Smith & Sharp, 1994). Furthermore, the fact that children often interact with same-sex peers suggests these differences are also reflected in their victimization experiences, with boys generally reporting more physical and girls reporting more relational victimization (Crick et al., 2001). However, few gender differences in levels of physical victimization are evident for boys and girls in early school grades (Kochenderfer & Ladd, 1997). Moreover, while some studies suggest that boys are more likely to experience victimization than girls (e.g., Cleary, 2000; Dhami, Leadbeater, Hoglund, & Boone, 2003; Olweus, 1994; Whitney & Smith, 1993), others have found no significant gender differences in victimization of third to sixth graders (Crick & Grotpeter, 1996) and adolescents (Paquette & Underwood, 1999). These mixed findings suggest that we need to look beyond gender per se for explanations of gender differences that have been observed in risks for aggression and victimization.
KeywordsGender Difference Behavioral Problem Social Competence Relational Aggression Relational Victimization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Crick, N. R., Nelson, D. A., Morales, J. R., Cullerton-Sen, C, Casas, J. F., & Hickman, S. E. (2001). Relational victimization in childhood and aggression: I hurt you through the grapevine. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds. ), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 196–214). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Dhami, M. K., Leadbeater, B., Hoglund, W., & Boone, E. (2003). The moderating effects of gender and school level poverty on changes in risks for peer victimization in first grade. Available from the authors, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, B. C. Canada.Google Scholar
- Hoglund, W. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2003). The effects of family, school, and classroom ecologies on changes in children’s social competence and emotional and behavioral problems during first grade. Available from the authors, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, B. C. Canada.Google Scholar
- Leadbeater, B. J., Kuperminc, G. P. Blatt, S. J., & Hertzog, C. (1999). A Multivariate model of gender differences in adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems. Developmental Psychology, 35 1268–1282.Google Scholar
- Maccoby, E. (2002). Perspectives on gender development. In W. Hartup & R. Silbereisen (Eds. ), Growing points in developmental science (pp. 202–222). NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Long-term outcomes for the victims and an effective school-based intervention program. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed. ), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives. NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Owens, L. D. (1996). Sticks and stones and sugar and spice: girls’ and boys’ aggression in schools. Australian Journal of Guidance Counseling, 6 45–55.Google Scholar
- Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. K. (1999). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45 242–266.Google Scholar
- Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., & Roberts, W. L. (1998). Observations of aggressive and nonaggressive children on the school playground. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44 55–76.Google Scholar
- Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2002). Bullying is power: Implications for schoolbased intervention strategies. Unpublished manuscript available from author, Department of Psychology, McMaster University, ON, Canada.Google Scholar