Pricing Innovation for a Transitioning Postal Administration

  • Mohammad Adra
  • Ali Ayub
  • Charles Crum
  • Michael Plunkett
Conference paper
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series book series (TREP, volume 46)

Abstract

This paper argues for the importance of pricing innovation in postal administrations that are transitioning gradually from highly regulated monopolies to less regulated, competitive entities. We argue that the incumbent operator ought to seek pricing innovation and flexibility under current regulatory constraints, with the anticipation that these strategies will better position the entity for competition in the future, if and when constraints are lifted. This paper offers a conceptual framework for pricing innovation based on established principles of market segmentation and value-based pricing. We illustrate the framework in the context of a Negotiated Service Agreement (NSA) that United States Postal Service (USPS) recently concluded with Capital One. The case study offers an opportunity to highlight the strategies, organizational changes, and resources needed for successful implementation of value-based pricing.

Keywords

Migration Transportation Marketing Kelly Monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, James Jr. 2003. “Postal Reform in Other Countries.” Prepared Statement for hearings before the President’s Commission on the United States Postal Service. http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/usps/testimony-docs/campbell.pdf
  2. Crew, Michael A. 2002. Lessons of Deregulation: Where Do We Go From Here? Working Papers on http://crri.rutgers.edu/pub/Working.html#mac.
  3. Crew, Michael A. 2003. “Unique Attributes of the Postal Service Business Model.” Prepared Statement for hearings before the President’s Commission on the United States Postal Service. http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/usps/testimony-docs/crew.pdf
  4. Crew, Michael A. and Paul R. Kleindorfer (eds). 2000. Current Directions in Postal Reform. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Crew, Michael A. and Paul R. Kleindorfer (eds). 2001. Future Directions in Postal Reform. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Eakin, Kelly B. 2002. U.S. Postal Rate Commission Testimony. MC2002-2: 10:24–45.Google Scholar
  7. Gable, Wayne and Jerry Eilig. 1993. Introduction to Market-Based Management. Fairfax, VA: Center for Market Processes.Google Scholar
  8. Huang, Kosin. 2003. “Price Management and Profit Optimization: From Planning to Execution.” Journal of Professional Pricing 12(1): 14–21.Google Scholar
  9. Kotier, Philip. 1999. Kotier on Marketing: How to Create, Win, and Dominate Markets. Free Press: NY.Google Scholar
  10. Nagle, Thomas T., and Reed K. Holden.. 1995. The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide To Profitable Decision Making. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Tolley, George S. 2001. U.S. Postal Rate Commission Testimony. Docket No. R2001: 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
  12. USPS Cost and Revenue Analysis Report, FY 2001.Google Scholar
  13. USPS Transformation Plan. 2002. Appendix H.on http://www.usps.com/strategicdirection/transform.htm
  14. nr]Wissenschaftliches
    Institut Für Kommunikationsdienste (WIK) Proceedings, Nr. 7., Liberalization of Postal Markets, Papers presented at the 6th Königswinter Seminar, Königswinter, 19-21 February 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Yankelovich, Daniel. “New Criteria for Market Segmentation.” March 1, 1964. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Adra
    • 1
  • Ali Ayub
    • 1
  • Charles Crum
    • 1
  • Michael Plunkett
    • 1
  1. 1.United States Postal ServiceUSA

Personalised recommendations