Skip to main content

Efficiency and Equity in Collective Systems of Interacting Heterogeneous Agents

  • Chapter
Collectives and the Design of Complex Systems

Summary

In this chapter we address the issue realizing efficient and equitable utilization of limited resources by collective decision of interacting heterogeneous agents. There is no presumption that collective action of interacting agents leads to collectively satisfactory results without any central authority. How well agents do in adapting to their environment is not the same thing as how satisfactory an environment they collectively create. Agents normally react to others' decisions, and the resulting volatile collective decision is often far from being efficient. By means of experiments, we show that the overall performance of the system depends on the types of interaction and the heterogeneity of preferences. We also show that the most crucial factor that considerably improves the performance is the way of information presentation to agents. It is shown that if each agent adapts to global information the performances are poor. The optimal guidance strategy to improve both efficiency and equity depends on the way of interaction. With symmetric interaction, the local information of the same type realizes the highest performance. With asymmetric interaction, however, the local information of the opposite preference type realizes the highest performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. B. Arthur. Complexity in economic theory: Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. The American Economic Review, 84(2):406–11, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bakhchandani, D. Hirshleifer, and I. D. Welch. Conformism and diversity under social learning. Economic Theory, 17:101–120, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Bala and S. Goyal. Self-organization in communication networks. Econometrica, 68: 1181–1230, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Bala and S. Goyal. Learning from neighbours. Review of Economic Studies, 65:595–621, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Bala and S. Goyal. A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica, 68: 1181–1229, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Banerjee. Efficiency and Stability in Economic Networks. mimeo: Boston University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. N. Durlauf and H. P. Young. Social Dynamics. Brookings Institution Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Dutta and M. O. Jackson. The stability and efficiency of directed communication networks. Review of Economic Design, 5:251–72, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Ellison. Learning local interaction and coordination. Econometrica, 61:1047–71, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Fudenberg and D. Levine. The Theory of Learning in Games. MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 183, 1420–33, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Harsarnyi and R. Selten. A Game Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Helbing. Quantitative Sociodynamics. Kluwer Academic, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Huberman and N. Glance. Diversity and Collective Action. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Nonlinear Systems, Springer, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Iwanaga and A. Namatame. Asymmetric coordination of heterogeneous agents. IEICE Trans, on Information and Systems, E84-D:937–44, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Iwanaga and A. Namatame. The Complexity of Collective Decision. Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics and Control, 6:2:137–58, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Johnson and R. P. Gilles. Spatial social networks. Review of Economic Design, 5:273–300, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Kaniovski, A. Kryazhimskii, and H, Young. Adaptive dynamics in games played by heterogeneous populations. Games and Economics Behavior, 31:50–96, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kirman. The economy as an evolving network. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 7:339–53, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Matteo. Toy models of markets with heterogeneous interacting agents. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 503:161–81, Springer, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.A. Nowak and R.M. May. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature, 359:826–9, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Rubinstein. Modeling Bounded Rationality. The MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Schelling. Micromotiv es and Macrobehavior. Norton, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Weibull. Evolutionary Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Wolpert, K. Wheeler, and K. Turner. Collective intelligence for control of distributed dynamical systems, Europhysics Letters, 49:6, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Namatame, A., Iwanaga, S. (2004). Efficiency and Equity in Collective Systems of Interacting Heterogeneous Agents. In: Tumer, K., Wolpert, D. (eds) Collectives and the Design of Complex Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8909-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8909-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6472-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8909-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics