Abstract
An evolution of the term “emergency modeling” to a large extent reflects the evolution of the other term: “public safety”. The starting point was the Chernobyl catastrophe, when comparably safe plant suddenly turned to be one of the biggest threat to public health and life around European continent. Since then, it has become evident that the list of potentially dangerous installations can be extended further and further. The new threats of terrorists applying supposedly well-controlled agents like biological weapon or “non-standard” arms like dirty bomb, are forcing the scientists and decision- making authorities to review the methods and instruments used for the information support of the decision-making. In particular, it may appear that the source of the dangerous agent is not linked to any existing installation or simply unknown. Second, the net of potential sources is so dense that there can be no time to run the model to estimate the area of risk — it has to be known “in advance”. Current paper presents some of possible responses to these challenges implemented in the modeling framework SILAM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bachelor, G.K., 1949, Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence. Aust. J. Sci. Res., 2:437–450.
Champagne, F.H., Friehe, C.A., La Rue, J.C., Wyngaard, J.C., 1977, Flux measurements, flux estimation techniques, and fine-scale turbulence measurements in the unstable surface layer over land. J. Atmos. Sci., 34: 515–530.
Degrazia, G.A., Anfossi, D., 1998, Estimation of the Kolmogorov constat Co from classical statistical diffusion theory. Atmos. Environment, 32: 3611–3614.
Goulart, A., Degrazia, G.A., Anfossi, D. and Acevedo, O., 2002, Modelling and eddy diffusivity for convective decaying turbulence in the residual layer. 15 th Symposium on Boundary layers and turbulence, American Meteorological Society, 267–268.
Goulart A., Degrazia G., Rizza U. and Anfossi D. (2003) “A theoretical model for the study of convective turbulence decay and comparison with Large-Eddy Simulation data”. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 107, 143–155
Hanna, S.R., 1981, Lagrangean and Eulerian time-scale in the daytime boundary layer. J. Appl. Meteor., 20: 242–249.
Hinze, J.O., 1975, Turbulence, Mc Graw Hill, 790p.
Kristensen, L., Lenschow, D., Kirkegaard, P. and Courtney, M., 1989, The spectral velocity tensor for homogeneous boundary layer. Boundary Layer Meteorology, 47, 149–193.
Muschinski, A. and Roth, R., 1993, A local interpretation of Heisenberg’s transfer theory. Contr. Atmos. Phys., 66/4, 335–346.
Nieuwstadt, F.T.M., Brost, R.A., 1986, The decay of convective turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 43: 532–546.
Pao, Y.H., 1965, Struture of turbulent velocity and Scalar Fields at Large Wavenumbers. The Physics of Fluids. 8: 63–1075.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sofiev, M., Siljamo, P. (2004). Forward and Inverse Simulations with Finnish Emergency Model Silam. In: Borrego, C., Incecik, S. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVI. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8867-6_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8867-6_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4697-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8867-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive