Abstract
The Penobscot River is the largest river within Maine and historically one of the most important rivers in New England for Atlantic salmon and other migratory fish. For more than a century, the economically and culturally important fish populations have been depressed dramatically due to hydropower dams on the mainstem river that prevented access to spawning habitat. In 2004, a broad coalition of stakeholders – including a hydropower company, the Penobscot Indian Nation, state and Federal agencies, and several conservation organizations – signed the Lower Penobscot River Comprehensive Settlement Accord. The Accord features two primary projected outcomes: a dramatic, ecologically significant increase in the proportion of the basin accessible to migratory fish combined with maintenance of, or potentially an increase in, energy generation. Increased access to migratory fish habitat will be accomplished through removal of two dams and construction of a naturalistic fish bypass around a third, while the energy generation lost due to dam removal will be recouped through structural and operational changes to remaining dams. Here we emphasize two essential conditions that made possible an agreement on the Penobscot that will benefit both energy generation and environmental and social interests. The first condition was the degree and type of stakeholder participation within the Penobscot’s decision-making context and the second is the spatial scale of the decision making – the entire system of dams on the lower river. The Penobscot Accord reflects the evolving role of stakeholders in hydropower decision making. Emulating the spatial scale of the Accord, which allowed the stakeholders to select from a broader range of alternatives to benefit both energy and the environment, will require further evolution of stakeholder involvement.
Keywords
- Migratory Fish
- Hydropower Project
- Fish Passage
- American Shad
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Adams WM, Hughes FMR (1986) The environmental effects of dam construction in tropical Africa: impacts and planning procedures. Geoforum 17:403–410
Ames EP, (2004). Atlantic cod stock structure in the Gulf of Maine. Fisheries 29(1):10–28
Bosshard P (2010) The dam industry, the World Commission on Dams and the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF) process. Water Alt 3(2):58–70
Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage 30:492–507
Crane J (2009) Setting the river free: the removal of the Edwards Dam and the restoration of the Kennebec River. Water History 1:131–148
Department of Energy (DOE), Department of the Interior (DOI), and Department of the Army (DOA) (2010) Memorandum of Understanding for Hydropower. March, 2010
Dudgeon D (2000) Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical Asia: prospects for riverine biodiversity. Bioscience 50:793–806
Echeverria JD, Barrow P, Roos-Collins R (1989) Rivers at Risk: a concerned citizen’s guide to hydropower. Island Press, Washington
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (1997) Final Environmental Impact Statement Licensing Three Hydroelectric Projects in the Lower Penobscot River Basin, FERC Project Nos. 2403-056, 2312-019 and 2721-020, Washington
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2004) Submittal of the Lower Penobscot River Basin Comprehensive Settlement Accord with Explanatory Statement. Project Nos. 2403, 2534, 2666, 2710, 2712, 2721, and 10981. Federal Register, Docket No. DI97–10
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2010) Final Environmental Assessment, Application for Surrender of License, Veazie, Great Works and Howland Projects Nos. 2403-056, 2312-019, and 2721-020
Foster NW, Atkins CG (1869) Report of Commission of Fisheries. Commissioners of Fisheries, Augusta
Gillilan DM, Brown TC (1997) Instream Flow Protection: seeking a balance in Western water use. Island Press, Washington
Gunkel G (2009) Hydropower – a green energy? Tropical reservoirs and greenhouse gas emissions. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 37:726–734
Hydropower Reform Coalition (HRC) (2005) Citizen toolkit for effective participation in hydropower relicensing, Washington
Kosnik L (2010) Balancing environmental protection and energy production in the Federal hydropower licensing process. Land Econ 86:444–466
Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ (1995) Downstream ecological effects of dams. Bioscience 45:183–191
Maine Department of Marine Resources (2009) Operational plan for the restoration of diadromous fishes to the Penobscot River, Augusta
Mekong River Commission (2005) Fisheries Annual Report. Phnom Penh
Montgomery DR (2003) King of Fish: the thousand-year run of salmon. Westview Press, Boulder
National Research Council (NRC) (2004) Atlantic Salmon in Maine. The National Academies Press, Washington
Opperman JJ, Apse C, et al (in press) The Penobscot River (Maine, USA): a basin-scale approach to balancing power generation and ecosystem restoration. Ecology and Society
Pollak D (2007) S.D. Warren and the erosion of federal preeminence in hydropower regulation. Ecol Law Q 34:763–800
Portland General Electric (PGE) (2006) Pelton Butte Fact Sheet
Richter BD, Braun DP et al (1997) Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 11:1081–1093
Richter BD, Thomas GA (2007) Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecol Soc 12(1):article 12
Richter B, Postel S et al (2010) Lost in development’s shadow: the downstream human consequences of dams. Water Alt 3(2):14–42
Sanger D, Belcher WR, Kellog DC (1992) Early Holocene occupation at the Blackman Stream Site, central Maine. In: Robinson BS, Petersen BJ, Robinson AK (editors) Early Holocene Occupation in Northern New England. Maine Historic Preservation Commission, Augusta
Saunders R, Hachey MA, Fay CW (2006) Maine’s diadromous fish community: past, present, and implications for Atlantic salmon recovery. Fish 31(11):537–547
Shabecoff P (1993) A Fierce Green Fire. Harper Collins, New York
United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010) Hydroelectric power water use. http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/wuhy.html. Accessed 1 Sept 2010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Opperman, J.J. et al. (2011). Hydropower, Salmon and the Penobscot River (Maine, USA): Pursuing Improved Environmental and Energy Outcomes Through Participatory Decision-Making and Basin-Scale Decision Context. In: Burger, J. (eds) Stakeholders and Scientists. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8813-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8813-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8812-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8813-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)