Advances in Tissue Elasticity Reconstruction Using Linear Perturbation Method

  • F. Kallel
  • M. Bertrand
  • J. Ophir
  • I. Céspedes
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 22)


Elastography, recently proposed by Ophir et al.,1 is a promising new acoustic imaging modality for tissue characterization. For example, it was proposed to use such technique for breast cancer detection on the basis of tissue hardness being indicative of the presence of tumor, as the practice of palpation examination indicates2. With this modality, tissue elastic properties are revealed through assessments of tissue displacements induced by a small external quasi static compression; specifically, the pre- and post-compression radio frequency (RF) ultrasound signals are used to estimate the axial tissue displacement and the associated strain component. Under the assumption of a constant stress-field, the strain-field can be interpreted as a relative measure of elasticity distribution; the strain being large in compliant (i.e. soft) tissue and small in a rigid (hard) one. This strain field visualized as a gray level image is termed an elastogram.1


Electrical Impedance Tomog Raphy Sensitivity Matrix Radio Frequency Signal Hard Inclusion Tissue Displacement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Ophir, I. Céspedes, H. Ponnekanti, Y. Yazdi, and X. Li, Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues, Ultrasonic Imaging 14:111 (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Céspedes, J. Ophir, H. Ponnekanti, and N.F. Maklad, Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo, Ultrasonic Imaging 15:73–88 (1994).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Ponnekanti, J. Ophir, and I. Céspedes, Ultrasonic imaging of the stress distribution in elastic media due to an external compressor, Ultras. Med. and Biol. 20:27 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Ponnekanti, J. Ophir, Y. Huang, and I. Céspedes, Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography, Ultras. Med. and Biol. 21:533 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Kallel, M. Bertrand, and J. Ophir, Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study, submitted for publication in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Y. Emelianov, A.R. Skovoroda, M.A. Lubinski, and M. O’Donnell, Reconstructive elasticity imaging, to appear in Acoust. Imag. 21, J.P. Jones (ed), Plenum Press, NY (1994).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Kallel, M. Bertrand, J. Ophir, and I. Céspedes, Determination of elasticity distribution in tissue from spatio-temporal changes in ultrasound signals, to appear in Acoust. Imag. 21, J.P. Jones (ed), Plenum Press, NY (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.R. Raghavan, and A.E. Yagle, Forward and inverse problems in elasticity imaging of soft tissues, IEEE Trans, on Nuclear Science 41:1639 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.R. Skovoroda, S.Y. Emelianov, M.A. Lubinski, A.P. Sarvazyan, and M. O’Donnell, Theoretical analysis and verification of ultrasound displacement and strain imaging, IEEE Trans, on UFFC 41:302 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Sumi, A. Suzuki, and K. Nakayama, Estimation of shear modulus distribution in soft tissue from strain distribution, IEEE Trans, on BME 42:193 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.G. Webster. “Electrical Impedance Tomography,” Adam Hilger, NY (1990).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Kallel and M. Bertrand, Tissue elasticity reconstruction using linear perturbation method, submitted for publication in IEEE Trans, on Medical Imaging (1995).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Saada. “Elasticity, Theory and Applications,” Pergamon Press, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. C. Fung. “Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues,” Springer-Verlag, NY (1981).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Philip E. Gill, Waltre Murray, and Margaret H. Wright. “Practical optimization,” Academic Press, London (1981).MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Demoment, Image reconstruction and restoration: Overview of common estimation structures and problems, IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing 37:2024 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Galatsanos and A. Katsaggelos, Methods for choosing the regularization parameter and estimating the noise variance in image restoration and their relation, IEEE Trans. Image Processing 1:322 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.N. Reddy. “An Introduction to the Finite Element Method,” McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Meunier, and M. Bertrand, Echographic image mean gray level change with tissue dynamics: a system-based model study, IEEE Trans, on BME 42:403 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Céspedes and J. Ophir, Reduction of image noise in elastography, Ultrasonic Imaging 15:89 (1993).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. Céspedes, M. Insana, and J. Ophir, Theoretical bounds on strain estimation in elastography, IEEE Trans, on UFFC, in press, (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Kallel
    • 1
  • M. Bertrand
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Ophir
    • 3
  • I. Céspedes
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut de génie biomédicalÉcole PolytechniqueCentre-ville, Montréal, QuébecCanada
  2. 2.Institut de Cardiologie de MontréalMontréal, QuébecCanada
  3. 3.University of Texas Medical SchoolHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations