## Abstract

Economic data are generated by systems of economic relations that are dynamic, stochastic, and simultaneous. In this chapter we consider dynamic aspects of single equation models. Distributed lag models are those that contain independent variables that are observed at different points in time. They are motivated by the fact that effects of changes in an independent variable are not always completely exhausted within one time period but are “distributed ” over several, and perhaps many, future periods. These lagged effects may arise from habit persistence, institutional or technological constraints. They may also be the consequence of how individual decision maker’s expectations are linked with experience. For more extensive justification of dynamic models see Cagan (1956), Nerlove (1956), and Muth (1961)

## Keywords

American Statistical Association Polynomial Degree International Economic Review Single Equation Model Partial Adjustment Model## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Almon, S. (1965). The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures.
*Econometrica*,**33**, 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Amemiya, T. and Morimune, K. (1974). Selecting the optimal order of polynomial in the Almon distributed lag.
*Review of Economic and Statistics*,**56**, 378–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anderson, T. (1971).
*The Statistical Analysis of Time Series.*New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Anderson, T. (1974). Distributed lags and barley acreage response analysis.
*The Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics*,**18**, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Burrows, P. (1971). Explanatory and forecasting models of inventory investment in Britain.
*Applied Economics*,**3**, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Burrows, P. and Godfrey, L. (1973). Identifying and estimating the parameters of a symmetrical model of inventory investment.
*Applied Economics*,**5**, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cagan, P. (1956). The monetary dynamics of hyperinflations. In
*Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money.*Edited by M. Friedman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Carter, R., Nager, A., and Kirkham, P. (1976). The estimation of misspecified polynomial distributed lag models. Research Report 7525, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
- Cooper, J. (1972). The approaches to polynomial distributed lags estimation: an expository note and comment.
*American Statistician*,**26**, 32–35.Google Scholar - DeLeeuw, F. (1962). The demand for capital goods by manufactures: a study of quarterly time series.
*Econometrica*,**30**, 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Delury, D. (1950).
*Values and Integrals of Orthogonal Polynomials Up to n = 26.*Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar - Dhrymes, P. (1971).
*Distributed Lags: Problems of Estimation and Formulation.*San Francisco: Holden Day.Google Scholar - Fomby, T. (1979). Mean square error evaluation of Shiller’s smoothness priors.
*International Economic Review*,**20**, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Frost, P. A. (1975). Some properties of the Almon lag technique when one searches for degree of polynomial and lag.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*,**70**, 606–612.Google Scholar - Fuller, W. (1976).
*Introduction to Statistical Time Series.*New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Geweke, J. and Meese, R. (1979). Estimating distributed lags of unknown order. Presented at North American Econometrics Society Meetings, Montreal.Google Scholar
- Godfrey, L. G. and Poskitt, D. S. (1975). Testing the restrictions of the Almon lag technique.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*,**70**, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Griffiths, W. and Kerrison, R. (1978). Using specification error tests to choose between alternative polynomial lag distributions: an application to investment functions. Working Paper, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
- Hamlen, S. and Hamlen, W. (1978). Harmonic alternatives to the Almon polynomial technique.
*Journal of Econometrics*,**6**, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harper, C. P. (1977). Testing for the existence of a lagged relationship within Almon’s method.
*Review of Economics and Statistics*,**50**, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hendry, D. and Pagan, A. (1980). Distributed lags: a survey of some recent developments. Unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar
- Hill, B. E. (1971). Supply responses in crop and livestock production.
*Journal of Agricultural Economics*,**22**, 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jones, G. T. (1962). The response of the supply of agricultural products in the United Kingdom to price, Part II.
*Farm Economist*,**10**, 1–28.Google Scholar - Jorgenson, D. (1966). Rational distributed lag functions.
*Econometrica*,**34**, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Judge, G., Griffiths, W., Hill, R., and Lee, T. (1980).
*The Theory and Practice of Econometrics.*New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Kmenta, J. (1971).
*Elements of Econometrics.*New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Liviatan, N. (1963). Consistent estimation of distributed lags.
*International Economic Review*,**4**, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lütkepohl, H. (1981). A model for nonnegative and nonpositive distributed lag functions.
*Journal of Econometrics*,**16**, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maddala, G. (1974). Ridge estimators for distributed lag models. Working Paper No. 69, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Maddala, G., (1977).
*Econometrics.*New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Maddala, G. and Rao, A. (1971). Maximum likelihood estimation of Solow’s and Jorgenson’s distributed lag models.
*Review of Economics and Statistics*,**53**, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Muth, J. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements.
*Econometrica*,**29**, 313–335.Google Scholar - Nerlove, M. (1956). Estimates of the elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities.
*Journal of Farm Economics*,**38**, 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nerlove, M. (1958).
*Distributed Lags and Demand Analysis.*Agriculture Handbook No. 141. U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar - Pagan, A. (1978). Rational and polynomial lags: the finite connection.
*Journal of Econometrics*,**8**, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pagano, M. and Hartley, M. (1981). On fitting distributed lag models subject to polynomial restrictions.
*Journal of Econometrics*,**16**, 171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Park, S. (1974). Maximum likelihood estimation of a distributed lag model.
*Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association.*Washington: American Statistical Association. Pp. 510–513.Google Scholar - Peseran, M. (1973). The small sample problem of truncation remainders in the estimation of distributed lag models with autocorrelated errors.
*International Economic Review*,**14**, 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Poirier, D. (1976).
*The Economics of Structural Change with Special Emphasis on Spline Functions.*Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar - Ramsey, J. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis.
*Journal of Royal Statistical Society*,**B**,**31**, 350–371.Google Scholar - Ramsey, J. (1970). Models, specification error and inference: a discussion of some problems in econometric methodology.
*Bulletin of Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics*,**32**, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ramsey, J. (1974). Classical model selection through specification error tests. In
*Frontiers in Econometrics.*Edited by Paul Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Sargan, J. (1980). The consumer price equation in the post-war British economy: an exercise in equation specification testing.
*Review of Economic Studies*,**47**, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. (1973). On the difference between conditional and unconditional asymptotic distributions of estimates in distributed lag models with integer-valued parameters.
*Econometrica*,**41**, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. (1974a). A modification of the Almon distributed lag.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*,**69**, 679–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. (1974b). An argument for the usefulness of the gamma distributed lag model.
*International Economic Review*,**15**, 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. (1975). The small sample effects of various treatments of truncation remainders in the estimation of distributed lag models.
*Review of Economics and Statistics*,**57**, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. and Guilkey, D. (1976). The effects of various treatments of truncation remainders in tests of hypotheses in distributed lag models.
*Journal of Econometrics*,**4**, 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. and Mann, W. (1977). A note on the approximation of arbitrary distributed lag structures by the modified Almon lag.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*,**72**, 442–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. and Sickles, R. (1975). On the efficiency of the Almon lag technique.
*International Economic Review*,**16**, 792–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schmidt, P. and Waud, R. (1973). The Almon lag technique and the monetary vs. fiscal policy debate.
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*,**68**, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shiller, R. (1973). A distributed lag estimator derived from smoothness priors.
*Econometrica*,**41**, 775–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Solow, R. (1960). On a family of lag distributions.
*Econometrica*,**28**, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Taylor, W. (1974). Smoothness priors and stochastic prior restrictions in distributed lag estimation.
*International Economic Review*,**15**, 803–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Terasvirta, T. (1976). A note on the bias in the Almon distributed lag estimator.
*Econometrica*,**44**, 1317–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Trivedi, P. and Pagan, A. (1976). Polynomial distributed lags: a unified treatment. Working Paper, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
- Tsurumi, H. (1971). A note on gamma distributed lags.
*International Economic Review*,**12**, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar