Laboratory Evaluation of Colloidal Actinide Transport at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP): 1. Crushed-Dolomite Column Flow Experiments

  • W. G. Yelton
  • Y. K. Behl
  • J. W. Kelly
  • M. Dunn
  • J. B. Gillow
  • A. J. Francis
  • H. W. Papenguth

Abstract

Colloid-facilitated transport of Pu, Am, U, Th, and Np has been recognized as a potentially important phenomenon affecting the performance of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) facility being developed for safe disposal of transuranic radioactive waste. In a human intrusion scenario, actinide-bearing colloidal particles may be released from the repository and be transported by brines (∼0.8 to 3 molal ionic strength) through the Culebra, a thin fractured microcrystalline (mean grain size 2 μm) dolomite aquifer overlying the repository. Transport experiments were conducted using sieved, uniformly packed crushed Culebra rock or nonporous dolomite cleavage rhombohedra. Experiments with mineral fragments and fixed and live WIPP-relevant bacteria cultures showed significant levels of retardation due to physical filtration effects. Humic substances were not attenuated by the Culebra dolomite. Comparison of elution curves of latex microspheres in columns prepared with microcrystalline rock and nonporous rock showed minimal effect of Culebra micropores on colloid transport. These data form part of the basis (see also Lucero et al., this volume) to parameterize numerical codes being used to evaluate the performance of the WIPP.

Keywords

Porosity Filtration Attenuation Sedimentation Geochemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avogadro, A., and G. de Marsily. 1984. “The Role of Colloids in Nuclear Waste Disposal,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, Boston, MA, November 14–17, 1983. Ed. G.L. McVay. New York, NY: North-Holland. Vol. 26, 495–505.Google Scholar
  2. Francis, A.J., and J.B. Gillow. 1994. Effects of Microbial Processes on Gas Generation Under Expected Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Repository Conditions. Progress Report Through 1992. SAND93-7036. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
  3. Harvey, R.W., and S.P. Garabedian, 1991. “Use of Colloid Filtration Theory in Modeling Movement of Bacteria through a Contaminated Sandy Aquifer,” Environmental Sciences and Technology, Vol. 25, p. 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacquier, P. 1991. “Geochemical Modelling: What Phenomena are Missing?” Radiochimica Acta Vol. 52/53, pt. 2, 495–499.Google Scholar
  5. Kelley, V.A., and G.J. Saulnier, Jr. 1990. Core Analyses for Selected Samples from the Culebra Dolomite at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Site. SAND90-7011. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lucero, D.A., F. Gelbard, Y.K. Behl and J.A. Romero. 1995. “Test Plan for Laboratory Column Experiments for Radionuclide Adsorption Studies of the Culebra Dolomite Member of the Rustler Formation at the WIPP Site”. SNL Test Plan TP 95-03. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
  7. Papenguth, H.W., and Y.K. Behl. 1996. “Test Plan for Evaluation of Colloid-Facilitated Actinide Transport at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.” SNL Test Plan TP 96-01. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
  8. Parker, J.C., and M.T. van Genuchten. 1984. Determining Transport Parameters from Laboratory and Field Tracer Experiments, Virginia Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin. VAESB 84-3. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Agricultural Experimental Station. 1–96.Google Scholar
  9. Public Law 96-164. 1979. “Department of Energy National Security and Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980.”Google Scholar
  10. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 1993. “40 CFR Part 191: Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes; Final Rule,” Federal Register. Vol. 58, no. 242, 66398–66416.Google Scholar
  11. WIPP PA (Performance Assessment) Division. 1991a. Preliminary Comparison with 40 CFR 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1991—Volume 1: Methodology and Results. SAND91-0893/1. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
  12. WIPP PA (Performance Assessment) Division. 1991b. Preliminary Comparison with 40 CFR 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1991—Volume 2: Probability and Consequence Modeling. SAND91-0893/2. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. G. Yelton
  • Y. K. Behl
  • J. W. Kelly
  • M. Dunn
  • J. B. Gillow
  • A. J. Francis
  • H. W. Papenguth

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations