Multiple Frequency Distorted Born Iterative Method for Tomographic Imaging

  • Osama S. Haddadin
  • Emad S. Ebbini
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 23)

Abstract

The goal of ultrasound tomography is to produce a two-dimensional (2D) map of the acoustical properties of a region of interest (ROI) from measurements of the acoustic field taken outside the ROL This map or image can prove very useful in medical diagnosis, non-destructive evaluation, and earth sciences [2, 5, 8, 12]. One solution of the tomographic imaging problem is by solving the inverse scattering problem [2, 4, 6, 10]. The inverse scattering problem is dependent on the total field inside the ROI which is unknown and is dependent on medium properties. This makes the inverse scattering problem nonlinear, and difficult to solve. A linearized, Born-approximate wave equation is usually inverted instead [4, 12].

Keywords

Microwave Expense Lution Dition Remote Sensing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. Beylkin and M. Oristaglio, “Distorted-wave Born distorted-wave Rytov approximations,” Optics Comm., vol. 53, pp. 213–215, 1985.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Blok and M. Oristaglio, Wavefield Imaging and Inversion in Electromagnetics and Acoustics, Delft University of Technology, report number Et/EM 1995-21, June 1995.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. C. Chew and Y. M. Wang, “Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution the using the distorted Born iterative method,” IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 218–225, June 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    W. C. Chew, Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Z. H. Cho, J. P. Jones, and M. Singh, Foundations of Medical Imaging, John Wiley and Sons, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. J. Devaney, “Inversion formula for inverse scattering within the Born approximation,” Optical Lett., vol.7, pp. 111–112, 1982.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. J. Devaney, “Geophysical diffraction tomography,” IEEE Trans. Geological science, Special Issue on Remote Sensing, vol. 22, pp. 3–13, January 1984.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. J. Devaney and M. Oristaglio, “Inversion procedure for inverse scattering within the distorted-wave Born approximation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 51, pp. 237–240, 1984.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. M. Habashy and R. Mittra, “On some inverse methods in electromagnetics,” J. Electromagnetic Waves and Appl., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–58, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    O. S. Haddadin and E. S. Ebbini, “Adaptive Regularizad on of a Distorted Born Iterative Algorithm for Diffraction Tomography,” Int. Conf. Image Processing, pp. 725–728, September 1996.Google Scholar
  12. [121.
    A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computed Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Slaney, A. C. Kak, and L. E. Larson, “Limitations of imaging with first order diffraction tomography,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 860–873, 1984.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Osama S. Haddadin
    • 1
  • Emad S. Ebbini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations