Advertisement

Evolution and Present State of Groin Hernia Repair

  • René Stoppa
  • George E. Wantz
  • Gabriele Munegato
  • Alfonso Pluchinotta

Abstract

Known since the beginning of the history of medicine,1 hernias have required help from the surgeon, mostly on the dramatic occurrence of strangulation (Figs 1.1–1.7). But when evaluating elective hernia surgery a little more than a century ago, Paul Segond and William Bull expressed the same sad opinion about the ill-named “hernia cure” of their time. In 1883, Segond said, “There is no operation in the past or present time which deserves the name of radical cure: this remains a chimera. Would radical cure be the unique aim of the surgeon, his duty should be never to operate.”2 Later, in 1890, Bull remarked, “The use of the word cure for speaking of the operative treatment should be abandoned, and the results measured by the period of relief before recurrence took place.”3

Keywords

Hernia Repair Inguinal Hernia Inguinal Hernia Repair Hernia Surgery Femoral Hernia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stoppa R, Wantz G, Munegato G, et al. Hernia Healers. An Illustrated History. Paris: Arnette; 1998:175.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Segond P. Cure radicale des hernies. In: Thèse du Concours d’Agrégation, Paris: Masson; 1883.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull WT. Notes on cases of hernia which have relapsed after various operations or radical cure. NY Med J. 1891;53:615.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassini E. Sulla cura radicale dell’ernia inguinale. Arch Soc Ital Chir. 1887;4–30.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anson BJ, McVay CB. The anatomy of the inguinal region. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1938;66:186–194.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shouldice EE. Surgical treatment of hernia. Ontano Med Rev. 1945; 12:43.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fruchaud H. Anatomie chirurgicale des hernies de l’aine. Paris: Doin; 1956.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fruchaud H. Le traitement chirurgical des hernies de l’aine chez l’adulte. Paris: Doin; 1956.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper AP. The Anatomy and Surgical Treatment of Abdominal Hernia. London: Longman; 1804, 1807.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomson A. Cause anatomique de la hernie inguinale externe. Journal des connaissances m’dicates pratiques et de pharmacologie. 1836;4:137.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McVay CB, Chapp JD. Inguinal and femoral hernioplasty. Evaluation of a basic concept. Ann Surg. 1958;148:499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Condon RE. Surgical anatomy of the transversus abdominis and transversalis fascia. Ann Surg. 1971; 173:1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Annandale T. Case in which a reducible oblique and direct inguinal and femoral hernia existed on the same side and were successfully treated by operation. Edinb Med J. 1876;21:1087.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheatle GL. An operation for the radical cure of inguinal and femoral hernia. Br Med J. 1920;2:68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henry AK. Operation for femoral hernia by a midline extraperitoneal approach: with a preliminary note on the use of this route for reducible inguinal hernia. Lancet. 1936; 1:531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nyhus LM, Stevenson JK, Listerud MB, et al. Preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on fifty patients. West J Surg. 1959;67:48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rives J, Stoppa R, Fortesa L, et al. Les pièces en Dacron et leur place dans la Chirurgie des hernies de l’aine. Ann Chir. 1968;22:159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stoppa R, Petit J, Abourachid H. Procédé original de plastie des hernies de l’aine. L’interposition sans fixation d’une prothèse en tulle de Dacron par voie médiane sous-péritonéale. Chirurgie. 1973;99:119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffith CA. Indirect inguinal hernia. With special reference to the Marcy operation. In: Nyhus LM, Harkins HN, eds. Hernia. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1964.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peacock EE, Jr, Madden JW. Studies on the biology and treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: II. Morphological changes. Ann Surg. 1974; 179:567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Read RC. Attenuation of rectus sheath in inguinal herniation. Am J Surg. 1970;120:610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aquaviva DE, Bourret P, Corti F. Considérations sur l’emploi des plaques de nylon dites cnnoplaques comme matériel de plastie pariétale. Cong Fr de Chirugie, Paris: Masson; 1949:453.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Usher FC, Ochsner JL, Tuttle LL, Jr. Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Ann Surg. 1958;24:969.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koontz AR, Kimberley RC. Tantalum and Marlex mesh (with a note on Marlex thread). An experimental and clinical comparison—preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1960;151:796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rives J, Lardennois B, Flament JV, et al. La pièce en tulle de Dacron, traitement de choix des hernies de l’aine de l’adulte. A propos de 183 cas. Chirurgie. 1973;99:564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, et al. The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64:269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Royal College of Surgeons of England. Guidelines on the Management of Groin Hernia in Adults. Report of a Working Party Convened by the Royal College of Surgeons of England. London, 22 April 1993.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nyhus LM, Klein MS, Rogers FB. Inguinal hernia in current surgical problems. Surgery XXXVIIII, St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, Inc., 1991; 6:403.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Devlin HB. Management of Abdominal Hernias. London: Butterworth, 1988.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harkins HN. In: Nyhus LM, Stevenson JK, Listerud MB, et al., eds. Commentary on preperitoneal herniorraphy. Preliminary report on fifty patients. West J Surg. 1959;6:48.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Casten DF. Functional anatomy of the groin as related to the classification and treatment of groin hernias. Am J Surg. 1967;114:894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gilbert AI. An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Ann Surg. 1989;157:331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bendavid R. The TSD classification. Diagrammatic representation of the various types and stages. A nomenclature for groin hernias. Monographie GREPA. 1993;15:12–14.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoppa RE, Warlaumont CR. The midline preperitoneal approach and the prosthetic repair of groin hernia. In: Nyhus LM, Baker RJ, eds. Mastery of Surgery, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1992.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nicoll JH. The surgery of infancy. Br Med J. 1909;ii:753–756.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marcy HP. The cure of hernia by the antiseptic use of animal ligature. Trans Int Med Cong. 1891;2:446.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lichtenstein IL. Hernia Repair Without Disability. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1970.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gilbert AI. Inguinal hernia repair: biomaterials and sutureless repair. Perspec Gen Surg. 1991;2/1:113.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wantz GE. Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;169:408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wantz GE. Atlas of Hernia Surgery. New York: Raven Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wantz GE. The technique of giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac performed through an anterior groin incision. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;176:497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wantz GE. Properitoneal hernioplasty with Mersilene,® giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac (GPRVS). In: Bendavid R, ed. Prostheses and Abdominal Wall Hernias. Austin: R.G. Landes Company; 1994.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brooks DC. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg. 1994;129:361–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Payne JH, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, et al. Laparoscopic or open herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg. 1994; 129: 973–981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stoker DL, Spiegelhalter DJ, Singh R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Lancet. 1994;343: 1243–1245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Barkun J, Wexler MJ, Hinchey EJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 1995;118:703–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia; early results. Br Med J. 1995;311:981–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wilson MS, Dean GT, Brough A. Prospective trial comparing Lichtenstein with laparoscopic tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1995;82:274–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Filipi CJ, Gaston-Johansson F, McBride PJ. An assessment of pain and return to normal activity. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:983–986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Horeyseck G, Roland F, Rolfes N. “Tension-free” repair of inguinal hernia: laparoscopy (TAPP) versus open (Lichtenstein) repair. Chirurgia. 1996;67:1036–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zieren J, Zieren HU, Wenger FA, et al. Laparoskopische oder Konventionelle Leistenhernienreparation mit oder ohne Implantat. Eine prospektiv-randomisierte Studie. Langebecks Arch Chir. 1996;38:289–294.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Champault GG, Rizk N, Catheline JM, et al. Inguinal hernia repair: totally preperitoneal laparoscopic approach versus Stoppa operation. Randomized trial of 100 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:445–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Heikkinen T, Haukipuro K, Leppala J, et al. Total costs of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal repairs: a randomized prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liem MSL, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, et al. Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1541–1547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Khoury N. A comparative study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1995;5:349–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schrenk P, Woisetschläger R, Rieger R, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1563–1566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tschuydi J, Wagner M, Klaiber C. Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy, early results. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:845–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wantz GE: Editorial: The American Hernia Society. Hernia. 1997; 1:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wantz GE. Abdominal wall hernias. In: Schwartz S, Shires GT, Spencer FT, ed. Principles of Surgery. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chevrel JP. Hernias and Surgery of the Abdominal Wall. 2nd ed. Paris Berlin Heidelburg: Springer-Verlag; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Stoppa
    • 1
  • George E. Wantz
    • 2
  • Gabriele Munegato
    • 3
  • Alfonso Pluchinotta
    • 3
  1. 1.Clinique Chirurgicale de l'UniversiteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire AmiensFrance
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryThe New York Hospital Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Clinique Chirurgicale de l'UniversiteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire AmiensFrance

Personalised recommendations