This chapter provides a case study of a social networking site, Cloudworks, which has been developed to provide a space for practitioners to share and discuss learning and teaching ideas. It describes the perceived need for the site, the vision underpinning its development, its functionality and an overview of some of the patterns of user behaviour we are seeing emerging in the site. It applies the community indicator framework (CIF) described in Chap. 14 to explain these patterns of behaviour.
KeywordsVortex Harness Metaphor Folk Karen
- Alevizou, G., Conole, G., & Galley, R. (2010). Using Cloudworks to support OER activities. Report for the HE Academy. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
- Bouman, W., Hoogenboom, T., Jansen, R., Schoondorp, M., de Bruin, B., & Huizing, A. (2007). The realm of sociality: Notes on the design of social software. The 28th international conference on information systems, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Clark, P., & Cross, S. (2010). Findings from a series of staff interviews about learning design, representations of design, design process, evaluation and barriers, Appendix 2, The OU Learning Design Initiative Project Phase Two Report, Embedding learning design and establishing a reversioning culture. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
- Cole, M., Engeström, Y., & Vasquez, O. A. (1997). Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Conole, G. (2008). Capturing practice, the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinhi, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of learning designs and learning objects. Hersey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2009). Cloudworks: Social networking for learning design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 25(5), 763–782. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/conole.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
- Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Engeström, J. (2005). Why some social network services work and others don’t — Or: The case for object-centered sociality %U http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why_some_social.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
- Engeström, J. (2007). Microblogging – Tiny social objects on the future of participatory media, cited in K. Anderson, blog entry June, 2007. http://strange.corante.com/archives/2007/06/13/nmkforum07_jyri_of_jaiku.php. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
- Galley, R. (2010). A framework of community indicators for online environments. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
- Galley, R., Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2012). Community Indicators: A framework for building and evaluating community activity on Cloudworks. Interactive Learning Environments.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. New York: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.Google Scholar
- Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine Issue 14.06. Available online at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds_pr.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. Schatzki (Ed.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace (R. Bononno Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
- Weller, M. (2010, June 25). Open conferences and the legitimacy deficit, blog posting. http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2010/06/index.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar