Improving Efficiency of Drayage Operations at Seaport Container Terminals Through the Use of an Appointment System
Designs of seaport container terminals involve three major infrastructure components: berth, container yard, and gate. In addition, Information Technology (e.g. terminal operations system, gate automation, and wireless handhelds) is becoming an integral component of container terminals. Beyond these traditional components, an emerging and potentially effective strategy, terminal planners need to consider to improve gate throughput, is the appointment system. Not only the use of an appointment system by a terminal can facilitate the movement of trucks in and out of the terminal, it can also help the terminal to manage its labor and yard resources. There are challenges to designing an effective appointment system. In this paper, two aspects of the appointment system are examined to provide insight to terminal planners. One parameter of an appointment system is the cap (i.e. limit) on the number of trucks that can enter a zone in the yard per time window. Limiting truck arrivals can be beneficial to some extent; however, if the caps are not set properly, it could be detrimental to both the terminal and truckers. The effect of limiting truck arrivals on crane utilization will be explored in this paper. A second aspect of the appointment system that will be examined in this paper is the scheduling rules (individual appointment system versus block appointment system) and their effects on resource utilization and truck turn time in grounded operations.
KeywordsTransportation Assure Beach Expense Arena
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bailey N (1952) A study of queues and appointment systems in hospital outpatient departments, with special reference to waiting-times. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 14(2):185–199Google Scholar
- Huynh N (2005) Methodologies for Reducing Truck Turn Times at Marine Container Terminals. PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
- Huynh N (2009) Reducing truck turn times at marine terminals with appointment scheduling. Transportation Research Record (2100):47–57Google Scholar
- Ioannou P, Chassiakos A, Jula H, Valencia G (2006) Cooperative Optimum Time Window Generation for Cargo Delivery/Pick up with Application to Container Terminals. Final Project Report (03–18), METRANS Transportation Center, University of Southern California & California State University Long Beach, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Isken M, Ward T, McKee T (1999) Simulating Outpatient Obstetrical Clinics. In: Farrington P, Nembhard H, Sturrock D, Evans G (eds) WSC ’99: Proceedings of the 31st Winter Simulation Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 1557–1563Google Scholar
- Kelton W, Sadowski R, Sturrock D (2007) Simulation with Arena, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Longbotham S (2004) The Web and Appointment Systems or a More Causative Marine Terminal/Port? ITS America Conference Presentation, ITS America, San Antonio (Texas)Google Scholar
- Morais P, Lord E (2006) Terminal Appointment System Study. Report (TP 14570E). Transportation Development Centre (ed), Online Publication: http://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/policy/14570e.pdf, Montréal (Quebec), 102 pp
- Namboothiri R, Erera A (2006) A Column Generation Heuristic for Local Drayage Routing given a Port Access Appointment System. METRANS Transportation Center (ed), Online Publication: www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/erera_nambo.pdf, California, 20 pp
- Namboothiri R, Erera A (2008) Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system. Transportation Research Part E 44:185–202Google Scholar
- PierPASS Inc (2010) About PierPASS. http://pierpass.org/about/, accessed September 12, 2010