Failure of firefighter escape rope under dynamic loading and elevated temperatures

  • G. P. Horn
  • P. Kurath
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Fire Service escape rope systems are a firefighter’s last resort for a controlled exit from elevated floors of a burning structure when conditions rapidly deteriorate. The escape rope is likely to be deployed from a room that is at least partially involved with fire and must support a fully loaded firefighter making a hasty exit, resulting in dynamic loading. These dynamic loads are accompanied by elevated temperatures, which will affect the strength and stiffness of the rope. Current standards only require that escape rope systems be tested at room temperature and under quasi-static loading in order to be certified as a personal escape rope. A pilot study will be presented that provides the first experimental quantification of the decline in rope strength and stiffness at elevated temperatures. These data are interpreted with a simple kinetics model for the dynamic loading of rope for various escape scenarios, suggesting that the “factor of safety” that is assumed in current escape rope standards is quickly eliminated by the dynamic forces during escape and temperature dependent strength deterioration. Suggestions and guidelines for an improved certification protocol are forwarded.

Keywords

Burning Fatigue Furnace Nylon Harness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O’Donnell, M., “City Firefighters Build Their Own Escape System”, The New York Times, June 6, 2005. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/06/nyregion/06ropes.html?ex=1153022400&en=1a9c55bc589e5d0b&ei=5070
  2. 2.
    NFPA 1983: Standard for Life Safety Rope and System Components, 2001 Edition. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Firefighter’s Handbook: Essentials of Firefighting and Emergency Response, 2nd Edition, Delmar Thomson Learning, Clifton Park, NY, 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vogwell, J., and Minguez, J.M., “The safety of rock climbing protection devices under falling loads”, Engineering Failure Analysis, 14, 1114-1123, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pavier, M., “Experimental and theoretical simulations of climbing falls”, Sport Engineering, 1, 79-91, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greiff, J.S., “Performance Tests of personal escape rope systems”, Fire Engineering, 45-60, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McKently, J., Parker, B., and Smith, C., Escape line bake off , presented at ITRS, 2003Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. P. Horn
    • 1
  • P. Kurath
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations