Advertisement

The Blast Response of Sandwich Composites With a Functionally Graded Core and Polyurea Interlayer

  • Nate GardnerEmail author
  • Arun Shukla
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

In the present study, the dynamic behavior of two types of sandwich composites made of E-Glass Vinyl-Ester (EVE) face sheets and Corecell TM A-series foam with a polyurea interlayer was studied using a shock tube apparatus. The materials, as well as the core layer arrangements, were identical, with the only difference arising in the location of the polyurea interlayer. The foam core itself was layered based on monotonically increasing the wave impedance of the core layers, with the lowest wave impedance facing the shock loading. For configuration 1, the polyurea interlayer was placed behind the front face sheet, in front of the foam core, while in configuration 2 it was placed behind the foam core, in front of the back face sheet. A high-speed side-view camera system along with a high-speed back-view Digital Image Correlation (DIC) system was utilized to capture the real time deformation process as well as mechanisms of failure. Post mortem analysis was also carried out to evaluate the overall blast performance of these two configurations. The results indicated that applying polyurea behind the foam core and in front of the back face sheet will reduce the back face deflection, particle velocity, and in-plane strain, thus improving the overall blast performance and maintaining structural integrity.

Keywords

Digital Image Correlation Face Sheet Blast Resistance Core Layer Foam Core 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Xue, Z. and Hutchinson, J.W., Preliminary assessment of sandwich plates subject to blast loads. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 45, 687-705, 2003.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleck, N.A., Deshpande, V.S., The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 71, 386-401, 2004.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dharmasena, K.P., Wadley, H.N.G., Xue, Z. and Hutchinson, J.W., Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35 (9), 1063-1074, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apetre, N.A., Sankar, B.V. and Ambur, D.R., Low-velocity impact response of sandwich beams with functionally graded core. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43(9), 2479-2496, 2006.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, Y., Ramesh, K.T. and Chin, E.S.C., Dynamic characterization of layered and graded structures under impulsive loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38(34-35), 6045-6061, 2001.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, E. Gardner, N. and Shukla, A., The blast resistance of sandwich composites with stepwise graded cores. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46, 3492-3502, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yi, J., Boyce, M.C., Lee, G.F., and Balizer, E. Large deformation rate-dependent stress-strain behavior of polyurea and polyurethanes. Polymer, 47(1), 319-329, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amirkhizi, A.V., Isaacs, J., McGee, J., Nemat-Nasser, S. An experimentally-based constitutive model for polyurea, including pressure and temperature effects. Philosophical Magazine, 86 (36), 5847-5866, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fatt, M.S. Hoo, Ouyang, X., Dinan, R.J., Blast response of walls retrofitted with elastomer coatings. Structural Materials, 15, 129-138, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roland, C.M., Twigg, J.N., Vu, Y., Mott, P.H. High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea. Polymer, 48(2), 574-578, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tekalur, S. A., Shukla, A., and Shivakumar, K. Blast resistance of polyurea based layered compositeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    materials. Composite Structures, 84, 271-281, 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bahei-Ed-Din, Y. A., Dvorak, G.J., Fredricksen, O.J. A blast-tolerant sandwich plate design with a polyurea interlayer. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 43, 7644-7658, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dynamic Photomechanics Laboratory, Dept. of Mechanical, Industrial & Systems EngineeringUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations