Advertisement

Macroscopic Approach for Biofluid Transport

Chapter

Abstract

The macroscopic approach to biofluid transport is used to analyze fluid flow in the system as a whole. This is in contrast to the microscopic approach that we will describe in Chap. 6, which is used to predict spatial variations of shear stress, pressure, and velocity within the fluid. The macroscopic approach is appropriate when we are not interested in the spatial variations within the system, but instead are interested in average transient values or output values. Common objectives of the macroscopic approach are to find the rate of accumulation of fluid in the system, the fluid flow into or out of the system, or the forces exerted by the fluid on the system. These objectives are accomplished by applying general conservation principles to the fluid in the system.

Keywords

Reynolds Number Pressure Drop Friction Factor Hydraulic Diameter Friction Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beek WJ, Muttzall KMK, Van Heuven JW (1999) Transport phenomena, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2002) Transport phenomena, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Durst F, Ray S, Unsal B and Bayoumi OA (2005) The development lengths of laminar pipe and channel flows. Trans ASME 127:1154–1160Google Scholar
  4. Ergun S (1952) Fluid flow through packed columns. Chemical Engineering Progress 48:89–94Google Scholar
  5. Fung YC (1996) Biomechanics: circulation, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Kameyama T, Asanoi H, Ishizaka S, Yamanishi K, Fujita M and Sasayama S (1992) Energy conversion efficiency in human left ventricle. Circulation 85:988–996Google Scholar
  7. Landis EM, Pappenheimer JR (1963) Exchange of substances through the capillary walls. In: Hamilton WF, Dow P (eds) Handbook of physiology, section 2, Circulation, part II. American Physiological Society, Washington, DC, pp 961–1034Google Scholar
  8. Navar PD, Navar LG (1977) Relationship between colloid osmotic pressure and plasma protein concentration in the dog. Am J Physiol 233:H295–H298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Olson DE, Dart GA, Filley GF (1970). Pressure drop and fluid flow regime of air inspired into the human lung. J Appl Physiol 28:483–494Google Scholar
  10. Olson RM, Sparrow EM (1963). Development in tubes and annuli with square or rounded entrances. AIChE J 9:766–770Google Scholar
  11. Paine PL, Scherr P (1975) Drag coefficients for the movement of rigid spheres through liquid-filled cylindrical pores. Biophys J 15:1087–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perry RH, Chilton CH (1973) Chemical engineer’s handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Pride NB, Permut S, Riley RL, Bromberger-Barnea B (1967) Determinants of maximal expiratory flow from the lungs. J Appl Physiol 23:646–662Google Scholar
  14. Ramanujan S (1913–1914) Modular Equations and Approximations to Π. Quart J Pure Appl Math 45:350–372Google Scholar
  15. Schlichting, H., 1968, Boundary Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. West JB, Dollery CT, Naimark A (1964) Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung; relation to vascular and alveolar pressures. J Appl Physiol 19:713–724PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Dept. Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of Texas, AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations