Skip to main content

Anaximander: A Survey of His Ideas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heaven and Earth in Ancient Greek Cosmology

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Library ((ASSL,volume 374))

Abstract

The history of Western philosophy begins with Anaximander of Miletus (610–547 B.C.), in Asia Minor, now Turkey. This is how he is treated, for instance, by Karl Jaspers in the first volume of his Die grossen Philosophen. Anaximander was the first Greek who wrote a treatise in prose that is referred to in the tradition under the title On Nature. Anaximander seems to have reflected on the discovery of writing, or more precise on the letters of the alphabet. It is said that Anaximander maintained that the letters of the alphabet stem from the Phoenicians and were introduced in Greece by Danaüs and not by Cadmus (DK 12C). In this context, the word στοιχεῖα means “letters” and not “elements,” as Dumont translates (1988: 40 and note on 1194). Diels qualifies this text as “Zweifelhaftes” and thinks that here another Anaximander is meant, namely, Anaximander the Younger, who lived about 400 B.C. (note at DK 12C). There are, however, reasons to believe that this text refers to the great Anaximander, as Panchenko has argued (2000: 418–420. He refers to arguments of Heidel 1921: 257–260. See also Naddaf 2003: 46).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a more extensive exposition of the etymology and meaning of (τò) ἅπειϱον, see Couprie (1989: 134–140).

  2. 2.

    More on the history of this argument in Couprie (1999).

  3. 3.

    About the text of the fragment Havelock says: “A more extended scrutiny of their vocabulary will enlarge doubt to cover the whole” (1983: 52). Already in a former publication Havelock concludes: “An image of the Milesian original, one suspects, has been compressed into the prose of an epitome, and in the process given abstract formulation” (1978: 65). In my dissertation, however, the conclusion is in favor of the authenticity of Anaximander’s fragment (Couprie 1989: 2–41).

  4. 4.

    A collection of more than hundred different translations in Couprie (1989: 192–211).

  5. 5.

    This interpretation was suggested in discussions with Radim Kočandrle. This does not imply, however, that I pretend to render his opinion here.

  6. 6.

    Conche renders it freely as follows: “Tous les philosophes de la nature regarderaient l’infini comme l’attribut d’une substance différente de lui, et appartenant à la classe de ce qu’on appelle les στοιχεîα, les ‘éléments’” (1991: 91).

  7. 7.

    For an extensive discussion on this statue, and especially on the question whether it is a representation of Anaximander (on which question the author’s answer is negative), see Darsow (1954: 101–117).

References

  • Blanck, Horst. 1997a. Anaximander in Taormina. Mitteilungen des deutschen Archäologischen Instituts (Römische Abteilung) 104: 507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, Horst. 1997b. Un nuovo frammento del ‘catalogo’ della biblioteca de Tauromenion. La Parola del Passato 52: 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkert, Walter. 1963. Iranisches bei Anaximander. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 106: 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conche, Marcel. 1991. Anaximandre. Fragments et Témoignages. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couprie, Dirk L. 1989. De verordening van de Tijd. Interpretatie en vertaling van het fragment van Anaximander, met een appendix over zijn astronomie. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couprie, Dirk L. 1999 (1998). “Hätte die Welt ein Ziel, […] so wäre es […] mit allem Werden längst zu Ende”. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte einer Argumentation. Nietzsche-Studien 27: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darsow, Wolfgang. 1954. Die Kore des Anaximandros. Jahrbuch des deutschen archäologischen Instituts 69: 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vogel, Cornelia J. 1957. Greek Philosophy, A Collection of Texts Selected and Supplied with Some Notes and Explanations, Vol. I: Thales to Plato. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, Jean-Paul. 1988. Les Présocratiques. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, Robert. 1910. Weltenmantel und Himmelszelt. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, Rafael. 1986. Der Ursprung der Wissenschaft bei Anaximander von Milet. Theologie und Philosophie 61: 551–561. (Also in Philosophia Naturalis 24 (1987): 195–215).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Daniel W. 2006. Explaining the Cosmos. The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Andrew. 2011. Anaximander’s Zoogony. Proceedings of the Third Biennial International Conference on Greek Studies. Adelaide: Dept. of Languages-Modern Greek, Flinders University (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, Eric A. 1978. The Greek Concept of Justice. From Its Shadow in Homer to Its Substance in Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, Eric A. 1983. The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics’. In Kevin Robb, ed., Language and Thought in Early Greek Philsophy, 7–82. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidel, William Arthur. 1921. Anaximander’s Book, the Earliest Known Geographical Treatise. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 56: 239–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Charles H. 1994. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. (repr. of revised 2d ed.1985, Philadelphia PA: Centrum Philadelphia; first ed. 1960, New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naddaf, Gerard. 2003. Anthropogony and Politogony in Anaximander of Miletus. In Dirk L. Couprie, Robert Hahn, and Gerard Naddaf, eds. Anaximander in Context, 7–69. SUNY: Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1973a. Die Philosophie im tragischen Zeitalter der Griechen (1873). In Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, eds., Kritische Gesamtausgabe (KGW) III.2, 393–366. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1974. Notes of Summer 1885. In: Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, eds. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (KGW) VII.3. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchenko, Dmitri. 2000. Anaximander, Hecataeus and Dionysius on the Mycenean Script. Hyperboreus 5: 418–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Martin L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Couprie, D.L. (2011). Anaximander: A Survey of His Ideas. In: Heaven and Earth in Ancient Greek Cosmology. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 374. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8116-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8116-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8115-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8116-5

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics