Grid Computing Technology and the Recurrence Quantification Analysis to Predict Seizure Occurrence in Patients Affected by Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

  • Roberto Barbera
  • Giuseppe La Rocca
  • Massimo Rizzi
Conference paper


Nowadays, a hot topic in the field of epilepsy research is the detection of any reliable marker, embedded in the electroencephalograms (EEGs), that can be exploited to predict the seizure with a sufficient advance notice. A useful analytical tool which may help epileptologists to unveil significant patterns in EEGs of people suffering from epilepsy is the Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA). This technique can be easily exploited by researchers since RQA software applications and related source codes are freely available. Nevertheless, the analysis of extensive EEGs can be considerably CPU-time-consuming so researchers are often obliged to strongly reduce the amount of data RQA is applied to. High throughput computing appears as the best solution to solve this problem. In this paper we present the preliminary results of the RQA performed on the EEGs of four epileptic patients who underwent pre-surgical evaluation for the resection of epileptic foci. In this study, EEGs were segmented in epochs of proper length each one analysed independently from the others using a Grid computing infrastructure.


Recurrence Plot Grid Infrastructure Dynamic Index Recurrence Quantification Analy High Throughput Computing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fisher R, van Emde Boas W, Blume W, Elger C, Genton P, Lee P, Engel J (2005). "Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: definitions proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE)". Epilepsia 46 (4): 470–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rizzi M (2009) “During a systemic inflammatory response, the effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on seizure susceptibility in the immature brain may depend on the proconvulsant and anticonvulsant mechanisms simultaneously induced by the elevation of parenchymal prostaglandin E2 levels”. Biosci. Hypotheses 2 (3):143-147.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sisodiya S (2003) “Drug resistance in epilepsy: not futile, but complex?”. Lancet Neurol 2(6):331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engel J Jr (1996). "Surgery for seizures". New Eng. J. Med. 334 (10): 647–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paglioli E, Palmini A, Paglioli E, da Costa JC, Portuguez M, Martinez JV, Calcagnotto ME, Hoefel JR, Raupp S, Barbosa-Coutinho L (2004) “Survival analysis of the surgical outcome of temporal lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis”. Epilepsia 45(11):1383-1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Webber CL Jr, Zbilut JP (1994) “Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies”. J. Appl. Physiol 76:965-973.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eckmann JP, Kamphorst SO, Ruelle D (1987) „Recurrence plots of dynamical systems”. Europhys. Lett. 5:973-977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marwan N, Romano RC, Thiel M, Kurths J (2007) “Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems”. Phys. Rep. 438:237-329.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takens F (1981) “Detecting strange attractors in turbulence”. In: Rand DA, Young LS, editors. “Dynamical systems and turbulence”. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, Springer: 336.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kantz H, Schreiber T (2004) “Nonlinear time-series analysis”. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andronico, G. et al. (2003). GENIUS: a web portal for the grid. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A 502, 433-436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barbera, R. et al. (2007). The GENIUS Grid Portal : Its Architecture, Improvements of Features, and New Implementations about Authentication and Authorization. Paper presented at the meeting Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises. 16th IEEE International Workshops on. doi:  10.1109/WETICE.2007.4407171
  13. 13.
    Webber CL Jr (2005) “Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems”. In Riley MA, Van Orden GC, editors. “Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioural sciences”. 27-94.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Ouyang G, Yao X, Guan X (2004) “Dynamical characteristics of the pre-epileptic seizures in rats with recurrence quantification analysis”. Phys. Lett. A 333:164-171.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galrikian B, Farmer J (1992) “Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data”. Physica D 58:77-94.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schreiber T, Schmitz A (2000) “Surrogate time series”. Physica D 142:346-382.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Barbera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Giuseppe La Rocca
    • 1
    • 2
  • Massimo Rizzi
    • 3
  1. 1.Italian National Institute of Nuclear PhysicsDivision of CataniaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Astronomy of the University of CataniaRomeItaly
  3. 3.ARCEM - Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sulle Patologie Cerebrali e del Midollo SpinaleRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations