Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Identity Theory and Research

Abstract

The concept of group identity, and its implications for the self and relation to others are addressed by the social identity approach within psychology. I review this approach, comprising social identity theory, self-categorization theory, and the most important subsequent developments. Social identity theory not only addresses the bases for differentiation and discrimination between groups, but it also views social competition as a means for disadvantaged groups to challenge the status quo, helping to explain social change. Self-categorization theory develops the concept of group identity, clarifying the contrast with personal forms of identity, and extends the realm of application to address a range of classical phenomena within social psychology. These include issues clearly relating to the intergroup context (stereotyping, salience, collective behavior), as well as others where an intergroup dimension has not always been acknowledged (self, social influence, leadership, etc.). Some key extensions and developments of the social identity approach focus on contextual factors that can affect the salience and strategic expression of identity (the social identity model of deindividuation effects), how identity is transformed and radicalized through collective struggle (the elaborated social identity model), and the importance of emotions to group identity and group life (intergroup emotion theory). These extensions help to specify further the precise forms that group behavior may take and the processes responsible for this. The influence of the social identity approach not only within social psychology, but also beyond its borders, points both to the importance of group identity and to the heuristic and explanatory value of this theoretical tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1984). Essays on Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organisation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, M., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: The desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: In-group love or out-group hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Alexander, M. G. (2002). Intergroup emotions and images. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 209–226). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1957a). Going beyond the information given. In H. E. Gruber & K. R. Hammond, R. Jessor (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41–69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1957b). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 209–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R. & Stroebe, W. (1972). Categorization and social judgment. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L. (1981). Stereotyping and intergroup behavior: Some thoughts on the cognitive approach. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, J., & Giles, H. (Eds). (2005). Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2009). Social identity, health and well-being: An emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Doosje., B. (2002). From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: How shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change reality. In C. McGarty, V. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 157–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, N., Regan, M., & Abell, J. (1997). On the context dependence of national stereotypes: Some Scottish data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: Impostors as sources of group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of the SIDE model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 28–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., Spears, R., & Watt, S. E. (2007). Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 761–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C. W., Snider, S., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136–163). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. (1995). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published in 1895).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. -P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards in-group members as a function of in-group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, B., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal group discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 345–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novelli, D., & Drury, J. (2009). The embodied group experience: Synchronised movement, social identity and ‘collective joy. Paper presented at BPS Annual Social Section Conference, 15th–17th September 2009, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Is limited information processing the cause of social stereotyping? European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, D. (1968). Group judgments in the Philippines: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 86–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. Special Issue: Intergroup processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 171–202). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (1994a). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D., & Levine, M. (1994b). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic considerations of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 944–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds). (2001). Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents or strangers? Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1955). The web of group-affiliations (Translation of “Die Kreuzung sozialer Kreise”, Soziologie (München: Duncker & Humblot) by Reinhard Bendix). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward a new conceptualization of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie, & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and the collective self: Self-categorization in context. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds), Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents or strangers? (pp. 171–198). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Greenwood, R. M., De Lemus, S., & Sweetman, J. (2010). Legitimacy, social identity and power. In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds), The social psychology of power (pp. 251–283). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., & Haslam, S. A. (1997). Stereotyping and the burden of cognitive load. In: R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 171–207). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of in-group bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332–362). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Scheepers, D. (2002). Distinctiveness and the definition of collective self: A tripartite model. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 147–171). Lexington: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Jetten, J., Scheepers, D., & Cihangir, S. (2009). Creative distinctiveness: Explaining in-group bias in minimal groups. In: S. Otten, T. Kessler, & K. Sassenberg (Eds), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion; A festschrift in honor of Amélie Mummendey (pp. 23–40). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, K. E., Lodewijkx, H. F. M., & Spears, R. (2005). Do unto others as they do unto you: Reciprocity and social identification as determinants of in-group favoritism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 831–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978a). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978b). The social psychology of the minorities. London: Minority Rights Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 144–167). Oxford: Blackwell and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. A. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. (1999). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. In T. R. Tyler, R. Kramer, & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 6–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. (2000). The distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (1987). Social identity and group polarization. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 142–170). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C. (1997). Ambiguity, social influence, and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1277–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. Deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Rupert Brown for his helpful feedback on an earlier version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Russell Spears

Authors
  1. Russell Spears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Spears .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public He, University of Miami, N.W. 10th Avenue, Suite 321 1425, Miami, 33136, Florida, USA

    Seth J. Schwartz

  2. , Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Leuven, 3000, Belgium

    Koen Luyckx

  3. School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, United Kingdom

    Vivian L. Vignoles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spears, R. (2011). Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective. In: Schwartz, S., Luyckx, K., Vignoles, V. (eds) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation