Advertisement

Faculty Hour: A Model for Interdisciplinary Quality Improvement in the Perioperative Setting

  • Sharon Muret-WagstaffEmail author
  • Brett A. Simon
Chapter

Abstract

Clinicians who are committed to quality and patient safety frequently lack the means and infrastructure to implement and sustain the interdisciplinary collaboration needed to actualize system improvement. The Faculty Hour model affords surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and others the opportunity to meet together at the start of the day once each week to advance quality and outcomes for patients, to accelerate learning and innovation, and to foster mutual joy in work.

Keywords

Faculty Development Department Chair Transversus Abdominis Plane Balance Scorecard Patient Safety Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Selected Readings

  1. 1.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Gaithersburg, MD: AHRQ, 2010. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/patientsafetyculture/. Accessed 19 Oct 2010.
  2. 2.
    Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. Are We Making Progress? Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2008. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/progress.cfm. Accessed 19 Oct 2010.
  3. 3.
    Bloom BS. Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: A review of systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):380–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis D, O’Brien MAT, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education. Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA. 1999;282(9):867–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forst L, Lacey S, Chen HY, Jimenez R, Bauer S, Skinner S, et al. Effectiveness of community health workers for promoting use of safety eyewear by Latino farm workers. Am J Ind Med. 2004;46:607–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanter RM. Innovation: the classic traps. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(11):72–83. 154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan RS, Norton DP. How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Bus Rev. 2006;84(3):100–9. 150.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, Conway J, Bluck P, Guest J, et al. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:424–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y, Carney BT, West P, Berger DH, et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA. 2010;304(15):1693–700(a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neily J, Mills PD, Lee P, Carney B, West P, Percarpio K, et al. Medical team training and coaching in the veterans health administration; assessment and impact on the first 32 facilities in the programme. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:360–64 (b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;8(3):CD000072.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations