Advertisement

Using Patient Safety Indicators as Benchmarks

  • Tina Hernandez-BoussardEmail author
  • Kathryn McDonald
  • John Morton
  • John Morton
  • John Morton
Chapter

Abstract

Ever since the Institute of Medicine’s report To Err is Human, patient safety has taken the forefront of quality healthcare delivery. One measure of patient safety is the rate of in-hospital preventable adverse events (PAE), or preventable injuries caused by medical care. PAEs have been linked to higher mortality rates and increased lengths of stay. Adverse events have been associated with most surgical procedures, and range from 2% incidence to almost 20% incidence by surgical procedure. Furthermore, it has been determined that over half of surgical adverse events are preventable.

Selected Readings

  1. 1.
    Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institutes of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhan C, Miller MR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003;290(14):1868–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rivard PE, et al. Using patient safety indicators to estimate the impact of potential adverse events on outcomes. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(1):67–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedman B, et al. Do patient safety events increase readmissions? Med Care. 2009;47(5):583–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vogel TR et al. Evaluating preventable adverse safety events after elective lower extremity procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaafarani HM, et al. Validity of selected patient safety indicators: opportunities and concerns. J Am College Surg. 2011;212(6):924–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gawande AA, et al. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery. 1999;126(1):66–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(4):269–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Guide to patient safety indicators. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 2003Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    AHRQ, A.f.H.R.a.Q. AHRQ Quality Indicators Software Download. 2007; Available from: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/software.htm
  11. 11.
    NQF, N.Q.F. NQF Endorsed Standards. 2011 [cited 2011 March 11]; Available from: http://www.qualityforum.org/Measures_List.aspx
  12. 12.
    Drosler SE, et al. Application of patient safety indicators internationally: a pilot study among seven countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(4):272–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, A., National Healthcare Disparities Report, U.S.D.o.H.a.H. Services, Editor. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morton JM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass: population-based results in patient safety. Arch Surg. 2011 (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tina Hernandez-Boussard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kathryn McDonald
    • 2
  • John Morton
    • 3
  • John Morton
    • 4
  • John Morton
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySCORE, Stanford Medical CenterStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Center for Health Policy, Center for Primary Care and Outcomes ResearchStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Minimally Invasive SurgeryStanford School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Surgery and Surgical Sub-SpecialtiesStanford School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  5. 5.Stanford School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations